• sbird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    When Win11 first released, the idiot I was (or maybe still am) decided to install it on my ancient laptop because it was the newest one. It had a 6th gen i3, 4GB of memory, and 128GB storage. Didn’t have TPM 2.0, so I found a workaround (forgot what it was but I did) and when I installed it, it CHUGGED.

    I even installed Unity on the thing because I liked game development, and when I tried to mouse click while it was running, it took a good half a minute to register (and I somehow put up with this for like a couple years). Even without Unity, I remember the battery life being a lot worse and simple apps took ages to load.

    Once I got a new laptop and learned that Linux isn’t voodoo computer magic and had a usable GUI, I installed Mint on my old laptop to try it out, and it was FAST. Gone were long load times. The battery at this point had completely died so it only powers on when connected to the wall, but the laptop felt like it was new again. The screen was still garbage so I wouldn’t use it as my daily driver, I much prefer my current laptop. If I ever got a new laptop, I would definitely install Linux again. (honestly I’m just not bothered to re-setup everything on Linux and backup all my data and settings and such on my current laptop, don’t think I have a thumb drive large enough to back up everything)

  • ManlickerM2001@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    Nederlands
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    You’d have to settle for a very primitive WM to get a Linux system to run on those specs though, let alone less. KDE and Gnome both idle at about 5GB ram.

    • LostXOR@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      5 gigs is a bit high; just checked and my Mint Cinnamon installation is idling at under 2. I used to have an old 4GB Macbook Air with Cinnamon, which ran acceptably considering its specs (and was a heck of a lot faster than MacOS).

  • digitalnuisance@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is what people mean when they say Linux nerds are out of touch.

    Imagine caring about these requirements in 2025.

  • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    3 days ago

    You could probably get Linux to run on a decently close friendship and a stack of paper.

  • xiii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Comfortably runs on electronic thermometer or pregnancy test.

    Linux 🤝 DOOM

  • Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m curious. I just updated to Windows 11 because I got tired of the full-screen EOL IS COIIMING PANNIICC! messages. I also just moved. I will be plugging in my PC tonight and won’t have Internet until the day after tomorrow. I wonder if it’ll let me do anything.

    • LostXOR@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      If you upgraded an existing installation of Win 10 you should be fine, AFAIK the internet requirement is only for installing a new copy of Win 11.

  • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    4 days ago

    I was just looking at that windows 11 list yesterday. My mother-in-law has a 7th gen i3.

    She’s not eligible to get windows 11, but her computer works surprisingly quickly. Well it did after I removed 2 different antivirus programs from it.

    But it’s fine for what she uses it for “Netflix”, maybe an occasional dock.

    No, Microsoft, I’m not buying her a new computer for that. If ever, she’d just get an iPad.

    My wife’s in favor of just letting the computer get infected if it gets infected since it’s just a Netflix machine.

    I’m not here to debate whether that’s a good idea or not, but I’m here to say that this is what is going to happen for the majority of people.

    I’ll probably end up putting Linux Mint on it if the WiFi card will play nice, but I expect that it will.

      • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Since it’s currently working, I don’t want to make any major changes because, as you know, that will be my fault when something doesn’t work as expected.

        So, once it has a problem, I’ll switch it to Linux and a crypto minter as a way to fix it.

    • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s crazy that microsoft, a company that once had 90+ market share of the OS market and is now down in the low 70% range and falling, would rather force this shit and potentially lose people to ipads than simply just make an upgrade path for older hardware (that isn’t even that old)

      What could possibly motivate this? They have to see the folly in such a decision with all their market research and shit. Do they really have the hubris to think that people will just go out and buy new hardware en masse because they said to so they could check emails, go on social media, and do streaming shit? Tinfoil hat time: were they influenced by a three letter agency or something to include the need for secure boot and tpm? Is there an exploit or backdoor in these?

      • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        That is a great question. But, I do not think so, the computer without tpm are just not encrypted at all. I think it is about collecting user data and advertising.

        • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          This makes sense, the tinfoil hat shit is one thing but it’s much easier to just explain it as tpm and secure boot will enable more data collection, which is probably a stronger revenue stream than keeping windows on 75% of pcs vs 72%

          Of course some nerd will probably figure out ways to defeat it all eventually but microsoft is probably (correctly) banking on your grandma not knowing how to install extensions and whatever 3rd party shit that will require

          The sad thing is at one point I would have said that’s a foolish way thing to bank on and eventually those computer illiterate folk will die out but it appears that that younger gen z and below have many people that are slightly more advanced than boomers in tech knowledge. They know how to use their phones but have no clue how to do anything interesting with them and have barely any idea how to use a pc.

          I worked in a school for a bit a few years ago and the amount of kids that didn’t know about something as basic as Adblock was shocking, let alone how to navigate the file system. Modern phones as a primary computing device really fucked that generation

          • Bongles@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            What’s the long term play? We can teach our parents as best as we can and we can teach our kids the same, but from what i can tell they don’t really even care. What happens in 50 years, will the biggest tech companies just have unprecedented control of what people see and can do because no one who doesn’t get a career in it, just won’t care how things work?

            • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              The long term play is regulation but good luck with that

              Why do you think the tech oligarchs are banding together to dismantle the government? They see the future you describe and recognize that we are at a key juncture to get there. Once the groundwork is laid they can go back to focusing on fighting each other for total dominance of the market

      • WarlordSdocy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 days ago

        I have to imagine it’s because most of their money comes from business customers who rely on windows and would have to spend tons of money to switch to something else or OEMs who are making new computers anyways who this won’t affect. There’s a reason windows upgrades have been free for a while, I don’t think they really care about getting money from people anymore, they’re just after money from businesses and OEMs.

        • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          But what’s the net benefit if they overall lose a ton of market share? Sales of, absolute best scenario, 10 million dollars? That’s a lot of money but it’s also really unlikely they’d get that level of sales and is it worth having a shareholders meeting in 1 year where they have to address questions about market share continuing to slide noticeably? Apparently I guess

          It seems like it would mainly be a good deal for oem pc manufacturers. If I was lenovo or whoever I’d be jazzed about it, let microsoft take all the negativity and sell more thinkpads

          • WarlordSdocy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yeah I agree I don’t think it’s a good long term strategy, losing the dominant position is gonna make it easier for businesses to seriously consider switching to Mac, Chrome OS, or Linux. And when more people start to switch the OEMs will follow. It’s the classic short term profit over long term success approach that companies will always fall into. For now it provides a nice bump in sales through mainly OEMs selling new computers to people and down the line through the businesses who don’t want to make the switch or can’t make the switch so are forced to buy new windows computers. But yeah it’s probably gonna continue to sink their market share if average people can’t use the new OS and are smart enough to switch to something else. Although I’ve seen people still using Windows XP while connected to the internet so who knows if it’ll even be a big impact or not. It will really just depend on if enough people switch that more programs get ported to other OSes and then businesses can actually make the switch more easily. And if that ball gets rolling Microsoft’s market share will keep tumbling down, but again it’s hard to say if that’s gonna start or if Microsoft is gonna have to do a lot more bad things first to get there.

    • HStone32@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Put my mother on mint. The only issue she encountered was the mouse cursor not appearing sometimes, but that hasn’t happened in a while. Other than that, she can hardly tell the difference from windows 10. You should go through with it.

        • macniel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Which is such a bullshit. On Linux we can met all requirements yet Netflix and co decides to not give us the best streams because we run Linux…

          • oo1@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            You can try the android netflix app via Waydroid(with widevine).

            Maybe not as resilient/convenient/stable as a browser, but i think you can set up waydroid app as a single icon.

            Of course then you’re just swapping MS for gooogle.

            • macniel@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              sure that, or… just don’t buy into it as streaming is more like Cable/PayTV 2.0 and go to the movies and or buy them in a store, or 🏴‍☠️

      • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, I’m thinking it couldn’t be worse than windows is now. It even sometimes will drop wifi connection. So how much worse could Linux be.

        My main concern for her is how often she edits documents. Since she gets her pension, she needs to do paperwork for it occasionally, so I don’t want formatting to mess something up for her.

  • Xanza@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    be alpine linux

    copy bootloader from the installer to ESP usb drive

    load entire OS from bootloader to RAM

    lbu commit, save changes to bootloader

    378mb fully loaded to RAM

    Linux. Hard disk optional.

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 days ago

    of all that shit microsoft forces upon you…

    it’s the msa (online microsoft account) that’s the biggest deal-breaker for me.

    absolutely not. never gonna happen.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      FYI: You can still use windows offline and without an account if you use Pro or Enterprise and I assume education edition.

    • treyf711@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I got doom eternal a month or so ago and haven’t gotten around to playing it. Now that I’ve tried it I realized that there’s a mandatory Bethesda account creation screen unless you don’t have an Internet connection. I’ve been turning the Wi-Fi off on my Steam Deck or pulling the ethernet on my desktop to get by that.

  • communism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Why have you (or whoever you got the image from) rewritten what the Windows screenshot says but in red?