One of the stupidest things I’ve heard.
I also would like to attach the bluesky repost I found this from:
https://bsky.app/profile/leyawn.bsky.social/post/3lnldekgtik27
Before we even get close to have this discussion, we would need to have an AI capable of experiencing things and developing an individual identity. And this goes completely opposite of the goals of corporations that develop AIs because they want something that can be mass deployed, centralised, and as predictable as possible - i.e. not individual agents capable of experience.
If we ever have a truly sentient AI it’s not going to be designed by Google, OpenAI, or Deepmind.
Yep, an AI can’t really experience anything if it never updates the weights during each interaction.
Training is simply too slow for AI to be properly intelligent. When someone cracks that problem, I believe AGI is on the horizon.
AGI?
Artificial General Intelligence, or basically something that can properly adapt to whatever situation it’s put into. AGI isn’t necessarily smart, but it is very flexible and can learn from experience like a person can.
“Does autocorrect cry when I don’t use its corrections?”
Gemini in it’s current form? No, but it is a fair question to ask for the future
Yeah, twenty years from now at the very least.
A little too optimistic
Yeah, but it’s like fusion. It’s always 20 years away for the last 60 years.
Realistically, as a dev who watched AI develop from cheap parlor tricks to very expensive and ecosystem crunching fancy parlor tricks that mangers think will replace all of their expensive staff who actually know how to design and create:
Modern “AI” is fundamentally incapable of actual thought. They are very advanced and impressive statistical engines, but the technology is incapable of thinking at a fundamental level.
If we lose perspective that computer systems are machines, we’re fucked. Stop personifying computer systems just because they make you feel things. JFC.
“Many of you feel bad for this lamp. That is because you crazy [sic]. It has no feelings…”
Ai lamp turns off and on with free will!
This could potentially be a concept in 100 years but is a stupid question for now.
What kind of fluff “journalism” is this?
It sucks but they do have an audience. I have older family members who swear ChatGPT has a “personality” because it will reply when they thank it.
thanks. my first thought was, “are you fucking kidding me?”
but this is what all the money wants us to think about “AI”, which is definitely not intelligence. they want everyone to accept that pattern recognition is indistinguishable from intelligence.
edit - alcohol makes me talk in cicles
Eliza says hello
We can’t even give humans human rights. AI will have to get in line.
Everybody poops
The pride of cancelling my 20 year subscription continues to swell.
Do humans deserve human rights? A more relevant debate.
deleted by creator
I wonder if Gemma is actually a white man
It is saddly common for LLMs to be racist and biased against people of color so maybe they are all secretly white racist males
So… the headline answered the question and people still read the article?
Ok so: Measure of a Man is one of my all time favorite Star Trek episodes, but come the fuck on. We are so, so far away from that. Maybe worry more about humans, right now, and the world we live in, instead of some nebulous fucking future that we won’t even goddamn reach if we don’t pay attention to, you know, humans and the world we live in.
These are the same type of people who believed ELIZA to be sentient.
Can our AI fall in love with a human? Scientists laughed at me when I asked them but I found this weird billionaire to pay me to have sex with his robot.
I have a preconceived conclusion about my anthropomorphized view of a statistical model with some heuristics around it. People who know what they’re talking about say I’m wrong, but I need an idea for an article to write that people will read.