Range

  • Small battery range: 240km
  • Big battery range: 385km

Motor

  • Motor: Single motor, rear wheel drive
  • Power: 150kW
  • Torque: 264Nm
  • 0-100km: 8s
  • Top speed: 145km/h

Dimensions

  • Bed length: 1.5m
  • Vehicle length: 4.4m
  • Vehicle height: 1.8m
  • Vehicle width: 1.8m

Comparison

  • 2025 Kia Niro length: 4.4m
  • 2025 Ford Maverick length: 5.1m
  • 1985 Toyota Pickup/Hilux length: 4.7m

Weights

  • Curb weight 1634kg
  • Max payload 650kg
  • Max towing 454kg

Charging

  • Port: NACS
  • Onboard charger: 11kW
  • Level 1 AC, 3.6kw, 20-100%: 11h
  • Level 2 AC, 11kW, 20-100%: under 5h
  • Level 3 DC, 120kW, 20-80%: under 30m

Safety

  • Traction Control
  • Electronic Stability Control
  • Forward Collision Warning
  • Automatic Emergency Braking
  • 2-stage Driver/Passenger Airbags
  • Full Length Side Curtain Airbags (Truck 2) (SUV 4)
  • Seat Side Airbags (2)
  • Backup Camera
  • Pedestrian Identification
  • Auto High Beam

More info

  • No1@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Curb weight 1634kg

    This was the standout spec that might make me consider one.

    I’ve been looking mainly at small hatchbacks/SUVs, and they all seem to weigh in at over 1800kg. And many are over 2000kg. Excluding Aptera…

      • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Weight affects basically everything. Less weight means less cost to buy, better range, better handling, less cost of maintenance (brakes, tires, etc), better safety, less getting stuck off-road, and so on…

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          +1

          Weight is everything. Removing it makes almost literally every aspect of a car better, and it’s usually a terrible negative for EVs.

          • Chip_Rat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Interesting! I must say I never considered it. My kia soul EV was heavy but handled very well. Loved that thing.

            • notthebees@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              EVs have a very low COG due to the batteries being at the bottom of the car. This is a good thing for handling but making them lighter would be even better.

            • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Oh yeah, its more than that. Low weight helps acceleration, braking (so safety), handling, range, wear on every component, and most of all, cost. The same sized tires will need less pressure, wear much less, and grip harder. If the car is lighter, you don’t need as stiff a chassis, nor as much braking to lock the wheels, less battery, motor, which means you can take even more weight off the car… You get where I’m going.

              Racecars are fast because they are light, not because they have big engines and expensive bodies. Little 1500lb cars can lap a $3 million 1500hp (and quite heavy, because of all the stuff in it) Bugatti around a track.

              Heavy cars can handle OK, but the cost is big.

  • MisterMoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    At least tell me there’s a DIN slot in the dashboard. As long as I can connect my phone via Bluetooth I’m good.

  • ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is actually pretty cool and makes sense. Can’t wait to see what the 3D printer community does with this if the dash can be customized with accessories. Anyone know when a test drive would be covered?

  • Aeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Everyone seems to hate this thing based on marketing but I actually kind of liked the looks of it, sigh.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Are you really going to take it into the woods with just two seats, mediocre suspension (likely, given the limited payload and towing), and limited range? Just get a Polaris side-by-side or something, they’re built for that.

              I get it, a cheap truck is appealing, but at this price target, it’s going to make a lot of compromises. It should do fine in plowed roads (might need sandbags in the back though), so it’ll probably be fine for around town use, which seems to be its target.

              • brenstar@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                With the motors and battery being on the backend of the truck, wouldn’t that give you better traction on the back wheels over the front wheels?

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I’m not sure how the weight is distributed, so maybe? Maybe it needs sandbags in the front?

                  Either way, it sounds workable as an around town truck, even in snow, without 4WD.

              • iamdefinitelyoverthirteen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Yeah, lol, I probably would. Unless they do something weird, suspension and wheels can be upgraded, and they have a battery/range upgrade that can anso preclude the need for sand bags. But yeah, I probably would.

                Also, a sxs needs a trailer and a truck to get to the woods, and I have nowhere to store a trailer and a sxs.

        • SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Same. I would like to have a 4WD overland rig that doesn’t pollute the air while I enjoy nature. Don’t tell the guys over at !fuckcars@lemmy.world this but I kinda want a Rivian R1S but with a near $100K USD price tag, It’s probably never going to happen. I’ll just stick with eMTBs.

    • Liz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I love this thing too hell and back. This is exactly what I want in a car/truck.

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Something like this I imagine I’d be happy with. A sedan/crossover and this. Wouldn’t take it out the county. Just trips to hardware/gardening stores and moving furniture. More than enough range and speed to go to work too. Any long drive I’d probably get an Accord hybrid or something. 2 vehicle family

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Same. We have two cars and three kids. One needs to be comfortable for longer trips, camping, etc, and the other just needs to go to work and back. This would be perfect for the second, and double as a furniture, garden stuff , dump, etc hauler around town.

      I personally hate trucks, but this is in the price range and could be handy.

  • BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    If pickups and other monstrosities were limited to people that can prove they need it, or even just to professionals, we wouldn’t need the stupid paradoxical concept of an EV pickup. Like “oh my flame thrower that I use to light birthday candles runs on biofuel, so we’re good”

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      What’s wrong with an EV pickup? Pickups are incredibly useful, and if it’s an EV, it could also be a commuter. I don’t need a truck very often, so I tend to rent when I need one, because they’re so terrible on fuel. But if it’s an EV, there’s a chance it’s reasonably efficient, so I could use it as my commuter and occasional dump/furniture store/hardware store/nursury run vehicle.

      This isn’t going to attract those dudes who like to lift their trucks and piss off everyone on the road, this is too small for those egos. This is going to appeal to people who need a truck for local use, like small business owners and DIY types.

      • BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        How many people actually need them though? You are one individual making your case, there are millions on the roads.

        I once moved a small fridge in my Honda civic

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Millions of 2 passenger trucks that can barely tow an empty trailer? This isn’t something your average “truck enthusiast” will want, this only really appeals to people who will actually use it.

  • Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    150kWatt and a top speed of 145? That’s kind of insane?

    Wait a minute, mph not km/h I guess.

    • paequ2@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, 145km/h might be a liiitle under powered. I drive between 120km/h to 130km/h on the US interstates.

          • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            So you’re saying your car is able to use mph when in the US? Fancy car!

            Btw, I was trying to make a joke about mph being some different kind of “fuel” that’s not compatible with kph, in case that wasn’t clear.

        • paequ2@lemmy.todayOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Every car I’ve owned has had a way to change the speedometer from freedom units to ✨ metric ✨ .

          For knowing what speed I should be going, I roughly follow these numbers. (Note, these are not equivalent.)

          • 35mph -> 50km/h
          • 60mph -> 100km/h
          • 70mph ->110km/h

          Also, very roughly 10km ≈ 5mi.

          However, most of the time I just follow the flow of traffic.

          I voluntarily switched to metric like 10 years ago, so meters, celsius, grams, etc make more sense to me now.

          • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            You missed the joke.

            I was making a joke as if kph and mph were physically distinct things and only one of them worked in each country.

  • ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Cool but now I’m worried this is being spammed everywhere. New capitalism marketing at foot?

    • trumpetmouth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      yea im already slightly tired of seeing this truck after the day(s) it’s been promoted.

        • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’ve seen it several times on Lemmy, Reddit, my news feed, my bloody RSS feed…etc

          And I block ads., I don’t see ads, but now social media in general is just half astroturfed ads.

        • WaterWaiver@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Every news website is covering it. I think I’ve spotted most of 10 articles around the place.

          The law of well-marketed unreleased goods dictates that this vehicle is not going to meet any of the promises mentioned in the articles. I hope to be proven wrong, but just like video games: don’t pre-order, wait for it to come out and be reviewed.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah, the only thing I’ve pre-ordered in the last few years is my Steam Deck. I think it’s also generally a good idea to avoid gen 1 of pretty much everything.

  • MichaelScotch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Toyota Tacoma didn’t exist in 1985. The first model year was 1995. Did you mean a 1985 toyota pickup/hilux?

  • Horsey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I struggle to understand the point of a truck that can only tow 500kg… that and such awful range. If the range were doubled this would be a great deal, but as is it’s just dead in the water.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Low towing capacity and an outrageously miserable bed size. Less than five feet? The powertrain of this should have been put in a station wagon, not a “truck.”

      • sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        There used to be a market for small trucks which has all largely evaporated. I’m all in favour of a smaller utility truck with limited range. Something like this would be ideal for my business.

    • notthebees@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      It can probably tow more, usually 500 kg is like the bare minimum for American cars. Also us towing standards are a bit more strict. A car in the EU is rated to tow more than a car in the US, even if it’s identical.

      • Horsey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Even if it were 1000kg, that’s still way below what a truck would want to tow though.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Depends on the truck owner. It’s not going to haul a boat, but it can probably do lumber (though the bed is kinda short and narrow), gardening stuff, and camping gear. That’s basically what I’d want a truck for, plus the odd piece of furniture.

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      $20k with some cargo for a car is pretty good. If you need a F150, then you’ll have to pay for one.

      • limelight79@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean, are there any cars available in the US for just $20k? I’m pretty sure a base Mazda 3 was more than that when we bought ours five years ago (before the pandemic, and ours is a higher trim model). I don’t think they’re making the really small cars any more (like the Toyota Yaris).

        Short version, I’m skeptical of this price point for even a small pickup. Great if they can do it.

    • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s because you’re thinking of trucks used first and foremost for heavy duty “truck stuff.” That is not the only market for trucks, at least in the US: https://www.thedrive.com/news/26907/you-dont-need-a-full-size-pickup-truck-you-need-a-cowboy-costume

      According to Edwards’ data, 75 percent of truck owners use their truck for towing one time a year or less (meaning, never). Nearly 70 percent of truck owners go off-road one time a year or less. And a full 35 percent of truck owners use their truck for hauling—putting something in the bed, its ostensible raison d’être—once a year or less.

        • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          This is my ideal build: https://www.slate.auto/share/5VXBMW

          I could barely make it out, but the tires on this build here are 255/70R17, which are effectively 31" tires. Great size. I was just talking to my wife last night about how I’d absolutely DD an older Jeep Cherokee XJ, slightly lifted on 31s (I used to have a 1998 XJ just like that), but the fuel economy would be abysmal at best. This thing, however, optioned with the big battery, would cost me roughly $10 at most to charge from empty to full, which is really nice.

          The lack of AWD is a bummer, but not entirely a deal-breaker. I’d absolutely rock this little thing on some of the local 4WD trails.