I just read this point in a comment and wanted to bring it to the spotlight.

Meta has practically unlimited resources. They will make access to the fediverse fast with their top tier servers.

As per my understanding this will make small instances less desirable to the common user. And the effects will be:

  1. Meta can and will unethically defedrate from instances which are a theat to them. Which the majority of the population won’t care about, again making the small instances obsolete.
  2. When majority of the content is on the Meta servers they can and will provide fast access to it and unethically slow down access to the content from outside instances. This will be noticeable but cannot be proved, and in the end the common users just won’t care. They will use Threads because its faster.

This is just what i could think of, there are many more ways to be evil. Meta has the best engineers in the world who will figure out more discrete and impactful ways to harm the small instances.

Privacy: I know they can scrape data from the fediverse right now. That’s not a problem. The problem comes when they launch their own Android / iOS app and collect data about my search and what kind of Camel milk I like.

My thoughts: I think building our own userbase is better than federating with an evil corp. with unlimited resources and talent which they will use to destroy the federation just to get a few users.

I hope this post reaches the instance admins. The Cons outweigh the Pros in this case.

We couldn’t get the people to use Signal. This is our chance to make a change.

  • masterspace@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lemmy is run by a bunch of tankies and the entire fediverse is under-moderated.

    Cutting off a ton of users and content from the fediverse is stupid and everyone in here just keeps coming up with vague generalities because they’re scared of Meta rather than have actually thought through what will happen and be able to articulate any actual harms.

    • Marxine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Boo hoo tankies bad, but big corpo run by billionaires who spread misinformation and intentionally act to topple legitimate governments in favor of their fascist agenda are akshually good”

      Arguing with people like you (corporate shill) is a waste of time, so I’d rather have fun instead.

    • skillissuer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      i’ll take those “tankies” over completely unaccountable thiel’s buddies any day. actual tankies seem to be contained to lemmygrad where they don’t bother anyone outside of their instance

    • awderon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The reactions you are seeing are based off of Metas history. We will see how it works out.

      • manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        i have no reason to believe anything will be different going forward, the same person is in charge and they have already stated they have the same plans here that they did on thier other projects.

        why pretend its going to be “different this time”?

    • icydefiance@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      People have articulated all kinds of actual harms, including two possibilities in the OP, but frankly they’re irrelevant.

      We know what Meta’s goals are, and we know they have absolutely no moral standards whatsoever. Exactly how they try to accomplish those goals doesn’t matter. We shouldn’t give them the opportunity to try anything.

      We should be scared of Meta, and we should keep them as far away as possible. Anything else is reckless and stupid at best.

      • masterspace@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        People have articulated all kinds of actual harms, including two possibilities in the OP, but frankly they’re irrelevant.

        No, they didn’t. The harm listed was that Meta will make a shinier platform that will syphon away users, that is happening regardless and is not a harm that is a result of federation, it’s a harm that’s a result of meta having more money to build a better platform.

        We know what Meta’s goals are, and we know they have absolutely no moral standards whatsoever. Exactly how they try to accomplish those goals doesn’t matter. We shouldn’t give them the opportunity to try anything.

        There goal is to launch a twitter competitor with a lot of users and make money off advertising. Nothing about that conflicts with the fediverse.

        Like I said, this thread is filled with a bunch of people shaking in their boots about the company who must not be named rather than actually providing sober rational assessment of what’s likely to happen.

        • icydefiance@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          that is happening regardless and is not a harm that is a result of federation

          Yes, it is. Read this: https://ploum.net/2023-06-23-how-to-kill-decentralised-networks.html

          There goal is to launch a twitter competitor with a lot of users and make money off advertising.

          They can do that without integrating with the fediverse. The reason they’re going to integrate with the fediverse is to embrace, extend, and extinguish.

          • masterspace@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, I’ve read that, and it’s not an example of a corporation killing a decentralized network through federation, it’s just a normal example of a corporation killing a decentralized network by having more money to make a better app.

            XMPP did not die because Google used that protocol, it died because people preferred using Google Talk over any of the XMPP apps. That would be the case regardless of whether Google used XMPP or not.

        • jerdle_lemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, you think they give a shit about the fediverse? They’re using ActivityPub because it’s easier for them. They’re not going to want to EEE us, because there’s not enough of us to matter to them.

          • icydefiance@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not easier for them, and once there’s enough people to matter then it’s too late to kill it. The fediverse is growing, and they want to stop that before the fediverse is big enough to matter.

    • Smallletter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do people think socialists or communists are bothered by this term tankie? It’s like called a white person cracker. It’s not really the effect youre hoping for, I promise.

    • flipht@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Real life is not speech and debate, and it isn’t an ad hominem to look at Meta’s past actions and to expect that they will continue in the same way.

      We don’t have to have a crystal ball and be able to detail exactly what will happen and when to know that this is bad news. Expecting random internet users to outthink a mega corp and send an accurate and verified copy of their plan is absurd, and it seems like a bad faith attempt at discussion.