• maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So nebula seems to be flying under people’s radar, but seems like the obvious option at the moment with many you tubers there already.

    It’s subscription based. I’ve got one. I really hope they find a way to join the fediverse in some way.

    • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nebula is only populated by some of the Top 1% of YouTubers who made a name for themselves on YouTube. You can’t get in until you’re already well-known and they approach you. And once you’re in, you’re stuck shilling for Nebula on YouTube for the rest of your days.

      They do not care about the little guy, and expect YouTube to act as its vetting process. It is not a replacement for YouTube. If YouTube went belly up one day, they would not have any place to curate new talent, and would be riding the coattails of whatever ends up being the real replacement for YouTube.

    • Phil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I really do not think that they are aiming to join the fediverse , the subscription model really suggests they want your money and have broadcast aspirations. I also think that the offerings are fairly low level atm of course that might change but I doubt it.

      • Steve@compuverse.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not sure where your getting broadcast aspirations from.

        Nebula was created by a bunch of youtubers. Mostly the video essay types. They didn’t like that videos got demonotized so easily if they mearly mentioned a controversy. So they created their own system that’s subscription funded so they don’t have to worry about advertisers.

      • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wouldn’t want them to abandon their subscription model. Just make it easier to use and distribute from within the fediverse.

        I think subscription models are good and should become normalised for things like artists and more serious content creators.

    • Nioxic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s subscription based.

      Then how exactly is it a youtube alternative?

      thats youtubes whole thing - being freely available.

      then pornhub is an alternative as well, guess ?

      • MrPear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think being categorized as an alternative to a platform is based on it’s functionality, not the way you pay for it. It’s about what purpose it has to the user.

        Besides that, you pay for Youtube as well, but with your data and maybe YT Premium.

      • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well nothing is free. You’re the product on YouTube.

        By the same logic nothing on the fediverse is an alternative, as it runs on donations from users which is basically a subscription model with built in welfare for those not able or willing to donate.

        Given that nebula videos are more difficult to produce than rambling text posts, it makes sense to be more stringent about the subscriptions. I’d say therefore it’s very much within the spirit of the fediverse as profits are given back to the creators.