• xylogx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Humans sweat. It is one of our superpowers and enables endurance hunting. Anthropologists theorize that early humans would have had to have developed water carrying technologies for this to be viable. They study primitive hunter gathers who still practice endurance hunting and they use water skins during the hunt.

  • seven_phone@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Everyone has sippy bottles now but when I was young in the late 70s we played out all day and did not drink for 7 hours at a time and no one died. Alright one person died but mainly not.

    • czardestructo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      My wife won’t leave the house without several water containers as it she is crossing the god damn Sahara. We live in the North East, its not even dry! I always ask her how she survied childhood without stupid fancy bottles that are marketed. Fortunately she is patient with my crap and loves me…

      • medgremlin@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I do this now and didn’t have to as a kid…however, I have a weird kidney problem where my kidneys will just dump water, whether or not I have the water to spare. This means that I have a minimum water requirement of 4 liters a day. It’s not as bad as when I was on a really horrible medication that started the whole issue. When I was on that medication I had to drink about 4 gallons of water a day.

        End result: I have a stupid party trick where I can down a liter of fluid in about 10 seconds, and a gallon of fluid in about 5 to 10 minutes depending on how recently I’ve eaten. (I did give myself water poisoning once, but that took 8 gallons over about 14 hours)

        Edit: Also, having multiple water bottles means I have somewhere to put all my awesome stickers!

  • defunct_punk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 months ago

    For the most part, yes, at least on a large scale. Proximity to a water source was pretty much a requirement for developments for most of history.

    On the smaller side of things, other commenters have already mentioned that we had ways to store water before bottles existed.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    Going backwards in time, they had metal and brass containers, before that they had wooden buckets and barrels, ceramic pots, carved out animal parts or fruit of plants.

    Before farming, probably a good portion of the water early people subsisted on was from the food they ate. (Berries and fruit, fish, meat, etc.) Water might pool around rocky areas after rain, even if there was no stream nearby in a pinch.

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    For the most part, yes. That is why they tended to congregate around water sources. Even early settlements and towns and cities were near waters sources even after we had portable water containers because water is heavy and large numbers of people need a large water source.

    But before we changed the environment significantly, there were a lot more potable water sources. More streams, more water pooled up after rains, etc. that could be ingested because of a lack of human pollution. If humans were within a days walking distance of a water source, they could do their hunting and gathering nearby and drink up afterwards.

  • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    Pretty much yes. If you look at a map, you’ll notice that most cities, especially old (like old old) ones are next to or near water sources. There are, of course, other reasons for this as well: building a settlement by water will also give you the opportunity to use boats, for transportation and shipping. Merchant cities tend to be by seas and oceans, because transporting cargo by ships is much more efficient than by land, especially before airplanes. Then there’s fishing, crop irrigation, and just that humans like bodies of water.

    But also, what do you exactly mean by water bottle? Because water transportation and storage vessels have been around for quite a while, and aqueducts have been built by various civilisations across history.

  • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    The answer should be fairly obvious to anyone who’s looked at an European map, there’s a reason why the oldest cities are always around or near rivers. Also humans had bottle-like technologies since essentially forever, it’s probably one of the first tools to be developed after “pointy stick”.

    • Zenith@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      The “bell beaker” people and culture is a fun rabbit hole for anyone interested in ancient water carrying technologies

  • Poojabber@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    We had water bottles way before plastic… we used wood, mud, clay, stone, and animal parts to store water before recorded history…

    • Iunnrais@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I suspect they’d include “cups, glasses, canteens, water skins, etc” in the category of “water bottles”. :p

  • TimewornTraveler@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    getting water used to be a daily chore. ever hear that song “jack and jill went up the hill to fetch a pail of water?” or see the old kung fu movies where they train running water up staircases?

  • SirDankbud@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    2 months ago

    You know the smell dirt makes when its wet? It’s called petrichor and humans can smell it better than sharks smell blood in the water. It is detectable by the human nose at 0.4 parts per BILLION. This gave early humans a huge advantage in finding water when needed. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrichor

    • Smeagol666@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I was trying to think of that word just a few days ago when I went outside and could smell that a storm was coming, then my ADHD kicked in an I forgot about it.

    • Diddlydee@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      There is an Indian perfume base called Mitti Attar which tries to replicate this smell. It’s like damp moss at first scent, then develops into rain on hot sand. It is entrancing. Proper Mitti Attar sells for thousands and takes years to make.