• raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    What’s the point though? With more and more trash content on the internet what would the bandwidth be used for? To force-feed people more ads?

  • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    fiber optics

    Won’t come out immediately, as that tech would first have to be finalized then introduced to the domestic market.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m sorry, fiber optics needs to be finalized before being introduced to the domestic market?

      I’ve had fiver since a long, LONG time

      • mriswith@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Yeah, I’ve had a fiber cable running all the way into my apartment for over a decade, and directly into my router for years.

      • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Not surprising it’s already ahead, as about 20 years ago they offered 100mbps to anyone who could pay for it (a certain Danny Choo comes to mind).

      • burghler@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Living there right now and that is hard to believe. It’s very common to find housing that still runs on VDSL. Living in Tokyo too

        • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          If it’s like here in Finland, coverage means there’s a fibre running under the street in front (or close enough nearby) but because it costs quite a lot to connect a building to it, especially if you want higher speeds and have to start retrofitting every apartment, many haven’t done it.

          For example our house officially has fibre coverage, but the street-to-house connection costs ~1800€ which is why we still run a VDSL while the apartment building down the street has 10Gbit to every apartment.

          • burghler@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            That’s exactly what’s going on here. My landlord refuses to install the upgrade even if I pay for it too 😔

  • malloc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 days ago

    Ignoring clickbait title, this is impressive. Networked devices used to be the limit on data transfer.

    Are there any devices even capable at reading/writing at 125,000G/sec?

    Seems breakthroughs here are more relevant to for backhaul networks.

    • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      Most likely sending pseudorandom data so that the data can be validated at the other end.

      Given they say it’s really 19 fibers in one, that’s really just 6,600Gb/s per fiber which is really just 4 colors per fiber with one of those and some amplifiers: https://www.fs.com/c/1.6t-osfp-infiniband-1392

      Apparently those go into a watercooled switch. Those 1.6T NICs sound absolutely insane. Makes your home 10G network look strings and cans.

      It’s not that insane in perspective. Probably still needs a whole rack of equipment to run just that test, but the technology is not too far off that it’s quite plausible.

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        they say it’s really 19 fibers in one … It’s not that insane in perspective

        The impressive bit being that the bundle of 19 fibres is around the same overall diameter as a single regular one - “diameter of five-thousandths of an inch (0.127 millimeters), which is the same thickness as most existing single-fiber cables already in use” - meaning those individual strands are unbelievably thin.
        It’s going to be interesting to see how a cable like that is getting fixed in the field when a backhoe inevitably goes om nom nom on one.

    • bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      That superpower is mere strength just from slamming many keyboards/mice/controllers at the wall and/or floor.

    • Godort@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      A crate full of microSD cards shipped as cargo could deliver speeds like this with a ping time measured in hours

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Now i wonder what would be the average transmission speed of a rocket full of SD cards to another planet, compared to wirelessly transmitting that data?

        That ping would be weeks or months btw.

  • Shadow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    175
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Pretty clickbait title to compare a lab speed to average internet. I’m sure it’s several million times faster than average Japanese internet too.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Internet_connection_speeds

      07.  United States 	274.16 Mbit/s
      
      19.  Japan 	        212.06 Mbit/s
      

      According to this page, seemingly sourced from Ookla, US has way higher average speeds these days.

      Japan had way faster internet on average than the US like twenty years ago, but the US actually did a decent amount of broadband growth even if it still doesn’t cover rural areas well.

      • xep@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        Is this all of Japan? I wonder what it looks like comparing just Tokyo with LA

        • bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          8 days ago

          Most DOCSIS (cable tv) systems are pushing gigabit speeds these days, especially in Los Angeles. That said, it is a bit of a misnomer considering CATV’s upload speeds are still doodie compared to fiber.

        • BassTurd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          I feel they may have been something of a catalyst that got other providers to start upping the speed. At this point, a lot of service providers offer at least 1 gig download speeds, with fiber being synchronous often. Some places offer up to 10 gigs to residential.

        • crank0271@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 days ago

          Wasn’t Google Fiber available in like, one town in Kansas? So I suppose yes, it did increase the average speed, but by a very small amount.

          • osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            Not quite. Google fiber did 2 things: 1) in any market thry entered, they forced an ante speed and 2) they provided a model that a bunch of local coops and/or municipal networks could follow (and did)

            They are currently in 28 markets in the US.

      • Subdivide6857@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        7 days ago

        This is yet another thing the Republicans have been attacking (funding for rural broadband providers). Our rural areas are actually extremely well covered. Most of the midwest is fibered up. My local co-op’s minimum offered speed is 350x350.

        • tamiya_tt02@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          I’m in a rural place and I just have DSL for my house and LTE for my phone. Lived here 20 years and that’s the worst thing about it.

          • Subdivide6857@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            My condolences. We have one last office to convert at the coop I work for. We’ll be 100% fiber by the end of the year. Hope your ISP is close as well.

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        ranked by Speedtest.net data for January 2025

        And the average speed of a passenger car is 170km/h, as ranked by speed data from the Nürburgring.

        People on shitty slow connections don’t have a need to go test that speed much, they know it’s shit, people who just got their fancy new 1Gbit fiber and want to know exactly how fast it is, do.

      • Shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Japan seeming to be ahead of the curve 20 years ago but now being at the same level or behind, seems to be a common theme.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Could be related to their stagnating economy and population. Conservatives love to point to Japan as a successful ethnostate, but their xenophobia has directly led to the stagnation.

      • redlemace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        ranked by Speedtest.net data

        I have no other ideas to collect that data better but i’m sure that does not give a good generic view of the reality. Every tech I know in Sweden uses bredbandskollen. Even if an end-users is asked if they did test speed and delay, the site was bredbandskollen in nearly 100% of the cases if they had done so. Therefore I dare say speedtest is missing data and that list has no statistical relevance outside the scope of the speedtest user population.

        Also, measuring speedtest result tells us about the subscription users took out. It does not tell anything about availability. I can get Gbit here, but subscribed to 100/100 because my average is low

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 days ago

      Its just got nothing to do with “internet”. That is the issue with the headline. Its just some random piece of fiber that isnt even connected to any wider network. Im assuming they just used big ass rolled up rolls of fiber connected to one another to get to the 1800km. There are no end user “internet” applications for it either. The only thing it could be used for is isolated connections between internet hubs or inside datacenters for local network.

      Still impressive ofcourse but just doesnt have anything to do with “internet” in the end user sense.

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    And yet, developers still build sites that load 500kb of JS just to display 5kb of text.

    We don’t need faster speeds, we need more reasonable and thoughtful site design. Most sites are ridiculously overengineered, and don’t need a lot of what has been stuffed into them.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      They are more under engineered because of cost cutting and over designed by management because of ignorance and hubris. Developer: “oh yeah this feature will take me a week to implement another week to make it performant and another week to pass QA” Manager: “Oh hell no just slap on this library into the project that I saw getting recommended on LonkedOn”

      Here is a lightning fast website that gets the proper amount of engineering time because the goals of management and that of the development team align perfectly.

      https://www.mcmaster.com/

    • 3abas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 days ago

      You know we use the internet to transfer way more than most websites right?

    • JargonWagon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      7 days ago

      But then how will you be able to mine every single possible data point on every single visitor so that you can maximize profits with advertisors?! Huh?! /s

      • Muhammad@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        7 days ago

        Nah its not even always about profit, sometimes its just pure sloppy showoff like a page where I am supposed to sign up should not be promoting the company, if Ive already got onto that page why do I need to scroll all the way down to the join/sign up button!

      • rekabis@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        IME it is more devs and managers going wild on the “golly gee wiz” features that are meant to dazzle site visitors, rather than on actual content (or to obscure a lack of actual material content).

        Sure, what you mentioned is a problem, and a serious one at that. But your issue arises more from marketers and bean counters and C-Suite execs than devs and managers.

  • Almonds@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 days ago

    Avg US speed is kind of silly to compare to isn’t it? I mean, in most of my state satellite is still the most reliable and that’s 100mb/s at most

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      more than half the households in my county do not have any high-speed wireline service available to them.

  • DancingBear@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 days ago

    Lol, does this mean there is one apartment building in Japan with a hundred units that uses more bandwidth than the entire United States 😂

  • deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    transmitting over 125,000 gigabytes of data per second over 1,120 miles (1,802 kilometers).

    Please include usable metrics in the title