• multifariace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      I was asked to feed an outdoor cat in my neighborhood. I did. Several small animals have likely died because I helped one feel more comfortable. Do I need to go to prison.

      I exist in USA where habitat is constantly destroyed for profit. There is no way for me to not be a part of this system. Should I be executed?

      I fixed some damage to my home where there were carpenter ants digging in the wood. Not only did several likely die, but I also ruined their home. Shackle me to a trailer hitch.

      • quantum_faun@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I should have been more specific. The point isn’t about what predators do in the wild, or about accidental, unavoidable deaths. It’s about the violence that is intentional, done on a massive scale, and most importantly, completely unnecessary. It all boils down to choice. A lion in the wild isn’t having a moral debate about its next meal; it’s just surviving. We, on the other hand, have tons of other options. Nobody’s talking about punishing someone for accidentally stepping on a bug. It’s about questioning the entire systems that treat living, feeling beings like they’re just products for our pleasure or convenience, when it’s totally avoidable.

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    If you are going through a place with a drive through that wraps around the building and you pull up far enough to block the exit so that it fucks up the works and an employee has to come out and direct traffic to unfuck it you should have your license revoked. Clearly you don’t have the situational awareness to be operating a motor vehicle.

  • communism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Maybe you shouldn’t be chomping at the bit to kidnap people and lock them in cages.

      • SelfHigh5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        The people using speaker on transit, or blasting external speakers while hiking through otherwise perfectly good woods… are disturbing the peace, sure. So are the college kids two floors up when they’re pre-gaming at 9pm. But the police would not take any of these calls seriously, unless the OP rule/law were in place.

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’ll defend people playing music through speakers in the woods…. It’s the fucking woods. It’s away from civilization. You’ll be away from them shortly. It’s fiiiiine. It’s not like you’re captive on public transportation.

          • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Boo. That shit carries so far. I go to the woods to get away from human bullshit. I’d much prefer the wind through the land with a birdsong accompaniment.

    • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yes! The amount of people who feel entitled to blast noise is too damn high! I was gonna comment on playing noise n speakers in public settings, but I’ll happily pile on here.

    • ChexMax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Leaf blowers and my neighbor’s power washer that emits a high pitched tone like a mosquito ringtone the whole time he runs it. It pierces my brain.

    • haloduder@thelemmy.clubBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Kind of pathetic how we still have to solve the issue of cutting up baby dicks as ritual.

      Egypt’s worse; they still cut off the clits of preteen girls as ritual.

      Jews and Egyptians aren’t even trying to hide it. They do it specifically to reduce the sensitivity of sexual organs.

      Christians are the useful idiots (as always) who have been duped into thinking it’s for ‘medical’ or ‘aesthetic’ purposes. In all honesty, Christians cut up the dicks of their kids because the dad’s dick was cut up for him and he doesn’t want to admit there’s something wrong with it.

      • Count042@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Christians don’t do it. Americans do it. And they did it for the same explicit reason as the others thanks to the psycho weirdo Kellogg of the cereal fame to try to prevent masturbation, and sexual pleasure.

    • Øπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      You’re gonna love learning about a certain priestly duty at said events. Clue: it involves the priest’s mouth. 🤢

      Oh, I’m sorry, downvoters. I misspoke. It’s “rabbi”, not “priest”. Oops.

      • Elaine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        Maybe in some cultures, but that’s not the norm. It was always just the doctor and his assistant. Honestly, it’s distressing to observe, so no parents or anyone else were allowed to be in the room. *I was a medical assistant for a gyno who did circumcisions during mom’s postpartum check up.

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        there’s more than one way for what i described: regulate tobacco like weed or regulate weed like tobacco, and having it ssomewhere in between of your choice

    • rekabis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      All you have to do is make it illegal to expose or proselytize religion to anyone under 22, and religion would likely die out within 2-3 generations.

      When you have been raised as a rationalist and know, at a fundamental level, the bullshit detection system called the Scientific Method, you need to have some pretty powerful mental illness in play to willingly grasp at religion.

        • rekabis@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Brainwashing gets increasingly easy the younger the subject is. Children, in particular, have an evolutionary need to automatically trust adults and what adults tell them, as they don’t yet have the cognitive tools to handle the world around them. Trusting adults have been baked into that part of childhood development because, historically speaking, it gave a distinct evolutionary advantage. Those children that listened to adults had a much stronger probability of surviving until adulthood.

          It’s why religions so strongly proselytize the young – get them young, get them for life.

            • rekabis@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              The Socratic Method tends to be effective in many cases so long as the other person remains open to reason and logic, especially the requirement for evidence.

  • manxu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Willful violations of the Constitution. Right now, elected officials can brazenly disregard the Constitution and the worst that happens is they are told not to do that again in the future, pretty please.