Starting next year, Google will begin to verify the identities of developers distributing their apps on Android devices, not just those who distribute via the Play Store.

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    2 months ago

    It really is past time we saw serious work on a mobile flavor of Linux. Not AOSP, not anything whatsoever downstream of Google, but a regular Linux distro with a mobile friendly DTE.

  • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    2 months ago

    and just like that google expands their walled garden and becomes apple 2

    remember when the internet was an open platform and computers were yours to run programs you wanted?

    • DegenerationIP@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      We had it coming… I do let my thoughts Go, that you Someehen need to identify yourself to even connect to the internet.

      They didn’t apply laws to regulate some stuff, so now they start hammering down to enforce Control.

      And big tech and companies will absolutely be one of the hardest Driver for this. There are Potential new ways to make Money. Basically a wet dream for especially big tech.

    • ronigami@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s about to get even worse. With AI and deepfakes, including deepfake porn, it will become impossible to argue against the complete and total tracking of all access to compute for the general population. There will be literally no justifiable reason to “control your own computer”, when children could get hurt.

  • Shady_Shiroe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 months ago

    I guess it’s time to switch to developing apps for Linux mobile distro

    The only reason I like android is cuz I can make my own apks and use them without issue.

  • Pycorax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why am I using an Android device then? Also how would this even work with open source apps that people build from source?

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You build an app from source, I assume you’ll get a prompt on your phone that says it can’t run because it’s not signed.

      • Pycorax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Another article did mention that it’s only for devices with Play Protect enabled so if they keep that as easy as it is to disable right now, it’ll be a non issue actually.

      • Pycorax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 months ago

        Another article did mention that it’s only for devices with Play Protect enabled so if they keep that as easy as it is to disable right now, it’ll be a non issue actually.

          • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            2 months ago

            I could see them making it a developer option, then force you to agree to giving up your warranty if you wanna turn on sideloading, and maybe even trigger a play intergrity thing that makes banking apps unusable.

  • RealM__@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    goddamnit I JUST bought a new Fairphone 5 and opted not to go for e/os variant, because I was worried of incompatibility issues.

    Guess I’ll have to learn how to replace my phone OS in 2026…

  • padge@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 months ago

    They’re already starting to clamp down on sideloading. I use Aurora Store out of principle, but it’s getting more and more common that apps will refuse to launch if not downloaded from the Play Store. I get the risk of sideloading maliciously modified banking apps or whatever, but surely you could just compare a checksum or something?

    • festus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Mostly; they just force themselves into the process for publishing each app and have an effective veto on apps. So yeah, no stores fully independent of Google.

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        … Didn’t the EU JUST fine Apple half a billion euros over the same thing?

  • Shanmugha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I sent Apple to hell because of dumb “you can’t change UI to your liking”, guess Google is next

    *yes, this was seen miles away. I work with a laptop most of the time, so phone doesn’t matter much for me, apart of a box that rings a few times a year

    **Yes, both companies are run by greedy dumbfucks. I am getting tired and angry that finding companies that are different takes actual dedication. It should not be this way

    • Xatolos@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, it’s nothing like what Apple’s been doing.

      Apple has been losing in court about everyone needs to give them money anytime anything makes any money on iOS, or even thinking absolutely allowing others to install anything beyond their App Store.

      This is Google demanding every app that can be installed on Android must be signed by them, and the only cost is registering with them your name and address, possibly verified by government ID. (And quite possible doxxing you at the same time as they already do on the Play Store…)

      These are very different, and unlike Apple, will more likely be applauded by numerous world governments in the current “anything a child can even remotely even know about” must have its users be checked to make sure they are “allowed to”.