• Bluetreefrog@lemmy.world
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I was prepared to leave this open in case it was sufficiently generic and not US centric, but it looks many comments assume it’s about the current US political situation. Locking. Rule 6.

  • Gary Ghost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Careful what you wish for. We could end up with something worse than now. How many times have we said, it can’t get any worse. It’s always getting worse

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    See: every other country.

    France has had three elections in quick succession, if I remember right, and all from failed budgets.

    (Really it’s because the people pushing the budgets are arguing like a bag of cats, but the budget failing is how they’re back to elections)

    Canada’s shortest administration was like 24 hours.

    Countries where the elections aren’t mandated to last 4 years get kicked out when they suck.

    • lemmy_acct_id_8647@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nailed it. Maybe a nation who’s entire system of checks and balances that it beat off to for years can be toppled to fast and utterly doesn’t deserve to be rebuilt.

      The experiment is over folks. It’s been dead for a while. 2025 just opened some people’s eyes to it.

  • Lumidaub@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    By what?

    Also, that would be motivation to pass bad budgets that nobody agrees on.

    • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Going off the example of other nations, the previously agreed budget allocations (from a prior year).

      Special elections could be invoked if there is complete deadlock, but that is unlikely to be a successful policy outside of nations that already have it.

  • DaMummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    You’re so close to realizing that you don’t have a government that represents you, or it’s citizens in general. It’s not a bug, it’s a feature.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Disagree, but only because I think there should be non-negotiable items in the budget, including paying your workforce.

      • Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m just used to the UK version.

        The government of the day sets the budget. Each year they announce things like tax rises/lowering etc but funding doesnt just stop.

  • First_Thunder@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    Depends on the consequences of failing to pass a budget. If you just keep using last year’s, it’s fine.

  • murmelade@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Yeah but it’s USA. Let’s wait and see how it plays out for the next 3 years or more. I don’t mind.