• Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    None of which likely constitutes legal justification for deadly force without evidence the offenders’ intent was more than just burglary of an unoccupied car (an occupied car would be a different story). There might be a case for the fleeing felon rule after they stole guns, but it would be weak.

    I don’t have much sympathy for burglars, but shooting in an urban area poses a considerable risk to bystanders and should be reserved for imminent threats to life.

    • ElleChaise@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, the case against busted thieves stealing weapons from secret service agents would be “weak”. Talk about delusional, sheesh.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The case for shooting them to prevent escape following such a theft would be weak.

        Of course they can be arrested and prosecuted for a long list of crimes.