AfterNova@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 8 hours agoShould the US have a 40% federal inheritance tax?lockmessage-squaremessage-square13linkfedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down117
arrow-up1-8arrow-down1message-squareShould the US have a 40% federal inheritance tax?lockAfterNova@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 8 hours agomessage-square13linkfedilink
minus-squareslazer2au@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·8 hours ago!askusa@discuss.online is that way
minus-square鳳凰院 凶真 (Hououin Kyouma)@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·8 hours agoBut isn’t this overtly political? I thought that was supposed to be more “chill” conversations
minus-squareBlaze (he/him)@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 hours agoSeems more “question about something that concerns everyone in the country” that politics
minus-squareslazer2au@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·7 hours agoTax is always a political discussion, but op is a bot and doesn’t respond to anything it posts.
minus-squareStinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 hours agoThat’s exactly what a bot would say.
minus-squareStinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 hours agoTextbook bot defense.
!askusa@discuss.online is that way
But isn’t this overtly political?
I thought that was supposed to be more “chill” conversations
Seems more “question about something that concerns everyone in the country” that politics
Tax is always a political discussion, but op is a bot and doesn’t respond to anything it posts.
I am not a bot.
That’s exactly what a bot would say.
No true bot fallacy
Textbook bot defense.