• yata@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Doesn’t work with the current US election system. Any third party vote will automatically be a wasted vote.

        • hasnt_seen_goonies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s more based on game theory. If your vote would decide between 2 candidates, but you vote for a third candidate that had a magnitude less amount of support, you are letting other people decide the election.

          That’s why a vote for a third party is a vote for the candidate you don’t want to win. The only way to change this is for a change to how elections happen (ie ranked choice voting).

          • clearleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            You guys created that prisoners dilemma for yourselves. Canada doesn’t have ranked voting either for federal elections and we have a party called the NDP which has been slowly creeping up on the conservatives and liberals. Last time I voted I didn’t get the winner I wanted and life went on. People died, babies got born, kids got older, high school classes graduated, and eventually we’ll vote again. What I hate the most about politics is how short term everyone’s plans are. We should be thinking more than 4 years ahead.

            • HorseWithNoName@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You guys created that prisoners dilemma for yourselves.

              So sick of hearing this. Who is alive right now who had a hand in creating the current system? Who is commenting on lemmy right now who has any congressional say? Anyone who says this knows it’s bullshit but is trying super hard to sound edgy. Don’t bother.

              • clearleaf@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                You couldn’t have missed the point any harder. Like zoinks man. They have you guys fogged to death.

                  • clearleaf@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    If you have two parties with deeply rooted power, it’s going to take longer than a year to change that. You might never get the 3rd party winner you want, but your kids could when they’re adults. A lot can change in 10 years when the conditions are set so imagine 100.

        • Soulg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, it is. And you’re not going to convince enough people to break the prophecy, either

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Nope, and stop claiming their votes are wasted.

        Because if everyone who doesn’t like either option actually voted third party, even if that party did not win, the percentage would be big enough to make the Democrats and Republicans shit their pants and scramble to adapt to keep their status quo.

        The only vote that is wasted is when you’re not voting on the candidate you want to lead the country.

        • _stranger_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The only wasted vote is that one that isn’t cast.

          We can talk about vote effectiveness though, that’s slightly more interesting.

        • _stranger_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s an interesting statement but you need to work on the “why” before we can call it a hypothesis. Also, I’m gonna need some kind of unit of analysis for “better”.

                • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You are fine with it, though. You’re fine with voting third party, and prefer it over preventing fascism from gaining traction. If you weren’t fine with fascism, then that would supercede your desire to feel morally superior for not actually participating in the system at all.

                  • Sorgan71@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I am not fine with it just because I refuse to play the silly game of republican vs democrat. You really overestimate your intelligence to think you know me like that.