• RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Ha!

    I went from #3 in the 80s to #4, then to #1 in the mid 1990s.

    I don’t think it matters where you start, what bothers me so much more is the lack of opportunity to move up this chart now. I knew, in my heart, that if I sold out and worked someplace evil I could have the big money, and what’s more, even without doing evil I could have the small money by following the steps - go to school, get a job.

    I don’t feel like younger people have that. It always took some degree of luck, but more like bad luck would set you back. Now it’s more like you need good luck just to get started!

  • D_C@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    After the embarrassment of the last ten years, and the ongoing embarrassment until the fat orange child rapist dies, then I’d say getting a backpack and leaving the Nazied States of America is probably the best move.

  • SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    Building it isn’t the problem. My Republican shithole burb just bulldozed the last of our open space, to build 600 single family units starting in the “low one millions.” Can’t afford that? No problem. They’re also building 2000 condos, starting in “the mid 500s.”

    Starting to see the real problem?

  • wander1236@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    There’s plenty of housing, it’s just not profitable to let people live there, so obviously it’s better to just leave it all empty.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      The backwards thing is, it probably actually is profitable, but we can’t see beyond the next quarter. We don’t understand that you can invest in your people.

      I might have kids if I had the space for it. You know, future taxpayers.

  • modestmeme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    200 million Americans in 1970, 340 million now. The dream of a nice house with a big yard is limited by space; space that also requires farmland, forests, parks, etc… We need dense apartment buildings, not houses.

    • evol@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      lol all the people in states ini housing crisis will just complain about rich companies by housing, or even the Chinese buying houses. No one just wants to build housing

  • Caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    Residential housing shouldn’t be owned by corporations. It should be built by them and then sold to individuals.

      • Caveman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah, anything that prevents the financialisation of residential housing floats my boat. In Iceland we have big corpos selling each other houses at over market price to increase the average m^2 price in an area. It’s pretty bonkers.