In order for politics to align towards your values you have to vote for the candidate closest to them, which forces the losing parties to get closer or die, which pushes the winning party to move towards you.

If you throw away or don’t vote none of that happens because you have no impact.

I’m with you and all, but shouldn’t we wait before considering it a victory?

Plenty of racists and sexists out there who won’t say a word about Harris publicly but will vote for Trump the second they enter the booth no matter what.

Sounds like a wild judgement of another person who you know nothing about.

Well yes, but think of how much more expensive our lives would be if we couldn’t exploit child labor without having to see it.

Agreed completely, the fact that some continue to swim in that cess pool confuses me

I don’t know why but I want to say persimmon. They’re worth getting tossed out of paradise for atnleast

“the same way I’m against carbs” is instantly now going to be one of my commonly used phrases.

I’ll add another:

He does it, not pretends someone else is requiring he do it

Yeah but they get away with it because their audience only cares/is fed the stuff they agree with

Trump said the government should be allowed to take people’s guns without due process (just breaking two constitutional amendments, NBD) and Republicans just had to wait a couple days and their voters forgot about it

I’m still waiting to see civilization start…

Good point, but also it’s not that they will lose all of the user data they sell if people switch off Chrome, just the parts that chrome collects.

If they were blocking ublock users from accessing any google products then it would be purely a ‘we only care about ad revenue’

It would be very interesting to see the internal data they use to make these decisions, but also knowing tech these decisions were probably made by a series of mid level managers sufficiently sucking the air out of the room until a critical mass was hit to make this happen

Thanks for sharing, he was talked about a lot when I was a kid but I never really understood why so much. Watching this I can’t help wonder if it was because he made homophobes uncomfortable (not that he was openly gay)

Or how about when he said that if he lost to Clinton:

“If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people — maybe there is, I don’t know.”

As long as the two party system reigns supreme and one party puts forth absolutely insane candidates, the other candidate will be no more than a middle ground candidate that tries to siphon votes and take no meaningful stances.

It’s a win win for conservatives, at worst they get someone that has to cater to some of their base.

You mean the candidate for the party of family values?

Or had to ride in a golf cart behind the other world leaders on a walk

Because even though he’s the stable genius god emperor, Trump’s opponent that his supporters claim is barely functioning still also is all powerful and rigging the everything against Trump

I cannot possibly fathom a world in which orange incontinence personified shows up understanding he can be muted.

I can only imagine either the fact that they will be muted is being overstated to us, or that he doesnt understand and will be charging his diaper ass across the stage the second that he realizes people can no longer hear him.

They’re waiting for their echo chambers to tell them the latest script on this, they never stay silent for long unfortunately

I imagine they did it to save others the work of determining whether your comment meant you are ignorant or intentionally just a fool.