Which is described in Ur-Fascism by Umberto Eco. It’s part of the fascist rethoric.
Which is described in Ur-Fascism by Umberto Eco. It’s part of the fascist rethoric.
Restaurant fatigue is a thing for sure. I think most people who are experienced travellers know this. That’s where grocery stores and supermarkets help but also global fast food chains. You know what you’re going to get and you’ll get it fast.
The thing is that we’ve gone through multiple generations of new owners each thinking a bit more than the last. Now they know how to appear decent while continuing to exploit earth, humans and other animals.
And people keep voting for their puppets.
I’m truly amazed that this was ever a thing. The US is a case study of destroying value while raising GDP.
Expected as the only real value of reddit are its users and the content they generate.
No, it is not. Socialism does not mean statism. Please feel free to read up on libertarian socialism, Anarcho syndicalism or even eco socialism. The Greens/EFA in europe lean towards libertarian socialism.
Proud of Guterres’ courage. We share a country and an alma mater and that also makes me proud.
Maria Vasectomy
Vox is Chega, PP is like Passos Coelho era PSD
Judaism is not Zionism and vice versa
My definition? What is my definition of tolerance?
Nearly a century ago? You’re a math genius, by your standards I’m turning 100 already.
The “open society” book was written with fascism as a background and as a reaction to it. But, of course - if only we had debated a bit more with fascists…
Go back to watching Peterson clips.
With the Netanyahu government, that’s the more plausible explanation.
You cannot be tolerant to intolerance if you want a tolerant society.
How would you describe it?
I think he wanted bosses’ - plural and possessive
You clearly need to go see the world. Take this as friendly advice.
Rest assured, I’m from Lisbon and all family is as well. I never thought of any place in Portugal as “inbred” (other stereotypes apply to different regions though). Love the Azores, btw.
You’re taking an authoritarian perspective. Fair, but I disagree. Tolerance is important because we as a society grow and evolve due to the discussion of ideas, simple or complex as they may be.
The paradox is that to achieve a tolerant society we must be absolutely intolerant to intolerant ideas otherwise intolerance “wins” and becomes the norm.
Exactly: in order to promote tolerance we must be intolerant to intolerance. It’s a paradox described by Popper.
“of course there are dead babies” as if 1 is not 1 too many. Also, don’t underestimate the power of bureaucracy even during a genocide.