• eestileib@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ve heard it’s like a 2% change? That’s within the margin of error of most polls.

    It’s noise. Random fluctuation.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      These shifts were not outside the margins of error in the Reuters/Ipsos and Echelon Insights surveys, while the Times’s pollsters said that they could not calculate such a margin for their recontacting survey. Nevertheless, the fact that the same shift was recorded across three different surveys lends credence to its validity.

    • person420@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      There’s two interesting things the article points out.

      1. These were recontact polls. So these were people who were already polled, presumably a small percentage changing their minds.
      2. These were multiple pills across different organizations running them. So while they can be within the margin of error, they all saw the same trend.

      Obviously you can’t go by polls, and there’s a ton of time between now and Nov, but it’s interesting nonetheless.

      • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Only one of them was a recontact poll, which they don’t even report a margin of error for.

        That one at least produced some interpretable anecdata, to wit: very few people changed their mind.

        It’ll take months of pounding away at it to reach most people, if it does at all.