• jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    On a movie set where everything is fake and you have an on-set armorer whose job it is to make sure everything is, indeed, safe, it’s a little bit different.

    There’s no expectation that a gun on a movie set would be real and firing real bullets.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I keep trying to explain that to people too. The whole point of having an on-set armorer is so the actor can stay in their headspace and not have to worry about checking to see if a gun is loaded with live ammo when their character is supposed to assume it is.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        True, but also, safety is everyone’s responsibility. Safety is always the first priority.

        • sunzu@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          safety is everyone’s responsibility.

          People’s responses to this comment really highlights the defects in the US gun culture. Justifying Alec’s handling of the gun is the issue that we have, when guns are around you act like all of them a load and you handle them as such until you personally verified that it is unloaded and even then you deff don’t fuck around with it.

          When people act like this, accidents really should not happen. When they do, people should reflect on why it happened, instead of focusing on cover up and blaming lower level wage slave.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          You either keep yourself in the headspace where your character is shooting a loaded gun and you give a good performance, or you do firearm safety checks. It can’t be both. Maybe you’ve never done any acting, but it really can’t be both.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            I’ve done acting, and I’m familiar with safe handling of firearms. You can absolutely do both.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Again, not if you want a good performance. And I am guessing your acting did not involve shooting a realistic weapon on a realistic set in a major motion picture.

              • catloaf@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                I’m not aware of any studies on the matter. If you are speaking from your own experience, it’s not any more definitive than mine.