Anymore
But what about an AI mouse?
Wow, a mouse with an extra button that can only be used to launch some process which opens up a window to ChatGPT. What a great use of AI!
Click for more info here!
/s
Eh, the mouse itself just has a dedicated button to launch something, that’s not so bad.
It would have been a better option to set it up so you could launch almost any program with it, but oh well.
one of our team members showed me a forever mouse with the comparison to a watch. This is a nice watch, not a super expensive watch, but I’m not planning to throw that watch away ever.
Then, almost immediately starts talking about Rolex watches as if they are not expensive. This woman is very out of touch with reality like all CEOs.
Absolutely fucking not
This is no less, than a gaslighting tactic
CEO: says stupid shit
Corporate Comms: sigh CLEANUP ON AISLE 3
This is like the lover who says “wouldn’t it be crazy if you and me had a threesome with your best friend”? Then claims not to be serious when the idea is rejected.
I mean, they 100% do have tangible plans. And I’m 110% sure that active portions of those plans already underway as well.
I think what they mean to say is, "the subscription mouse isn’t available today… I mean, unless you like, unless you wanted it to be or whatever? uWu…"
Fruit of the Loom has no plans for a subscription underpants.
“Subscription expired, reverting to transparent burlap trial version.”
I’ll stick to my regular forever underpants then. Literally.
“her”.
And there you have it.
Imagine it’s like your Rolex. You’re going to really love that.
The fact he said this, makes you want to punch his smug face.
sh-sh-sh-shaaa
The ceo is a woman, FYI
Least out-of-touch CEO
Do people with a Rolex pay subscriptions for their disgustingly expensive watches?
Lmao, the only watch I’ve ever spent more than like $20-$30 was a Seiko UC-2000.
That something so ridiculous is within the realm of possibility just shows how absurd the subscription landscape has gotten. It’s sad that they even have to clarify this.
Feeling cute, might boycott them anyways :)
They have to clarify this, because their CEO said that was something she wanted to make. What they’re actually doing is covering their asses because of all the negative sentiment they’ve stirred up now. It’s actually just a lie to say they have no plans.
Not just wanted to make, the original article implied existence of a prototype. That’s “putting into effect a plan” which, for fans of causality, implies a pre-existing plan.
But won’t rule it out.
Logi CEO: “Heh, yeah, well you know, there is a rich tradition of tech companies pranking the public with silly, unexpected practical jokes on April 1.”
“But sir, it’s August.”
“Oh, well I guess that’s what makes it so unexpected, heh. Yeah. Unless you want a mouse subscription? No? Oh, just forget that I asked - that was, ah, part of the joke. Apr- August Fools!”
Good because the entire idea is completely idiotic.
