• MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I tried to roll out ipv6 when I was sysadmin for a small ISP. ARIN gave me a /32 block with no fuss. I started handing them out only to discover most routers at the time couldn’t use them. Not much has changed. No one offers them and I just turned it off at my present job. None of my windows machine have the ipv6 stack enabled.

    • psvrh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      “There but for the grace of god go thee.”

      Or, to be less poetic, “don’t get cocky”.

      Hacks can happen to anyone. Better lessons to learn is “don’t enable or install what you don’t need” and “keep machines you don’t trust off your local network”

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    3 months ago

    Well, not ALL Windows machines…

    “Systems are not affected if IPv6 is disabled on the target machine.”

    I can’t remember the last time I saw an IPv6 machine…

    • HarriPotero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      My ISP enabled native IPv6 for me a few months back. It’s pretty great. I don’t have any windows machines, but I doubt my wife has disabled it on hers.

      Anyway, our router is set up to drop incoming IPv6 traffic by default, sanely enough.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      IPv6 is enabled by default on windows. Additionally, MS does no testing against machines with ipv6 turned off. People that go through the effort of turning it off may run into problems.

    • cbarrick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      Where I work, everything is on IPv6. Both the infrastructure for the software services that we run, and our own internal corporate network.

      My ISP also provides publicly routable IPv6 prefixes over DHCP. Any layman in my city with this ISP will be on IPv6 by default.

      I also use IPv6 for my LAN.

      Like, it’s just kind of the default in my neck of the woods…

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        I have two different ISPs offering gigabit fiber to the home, neither offers IPv6 at all. One of thes years I’ll tunnel an IPv6 prefix or two onto my network to actually get some real world experience with…

        • Archer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          ISPs nowadays tend to be either having offered 6 for years or never offered it. Not much middle ground

        • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s strange. Mine dual routes. So we get both. I don’t know they generally tell you the ipv6 unless you ask though as most internal networks are still using primarily ipv4

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s on by default with Win10 at least.

      I disable it on all machines I build. And use GP to ensure it stays disabled.

        • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          There’s just no need for it on small networks. Just another thing running that can go wrong (as it did here).

          It also contributes to increased troubleshooting when networking is acting funny, because now you have 2 stacks to consider.

  • bruhduh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yay, new Xbox jailbreak method, can’t wait for new modded warfare videos about it

  • LaggyKar@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    This would presumably mainly be an issue for computers open to the internet. So not so much for home PCs, unless the router’s firewall is opened up.

    • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      For a professional sysadmin’s home network? Maybe. For the average Joe who probably has their 12-year-old toaster still connected to their wifi? I wouldn’t bank on it.

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve not read the CVE but assuming it works on any IPv6 address including the privacy extensions addresses, it’s a problem. Depending on what most routers do in terms of IPv6 firewalling.

      My opinion is, IPv6 firewalls should, by default, offer similar levels of security to NAT. That is, no unsolicited incoming connections but allow outgoing ones freely.

      In my experience, it’s a bit hit-and-miss whether they do or not.

      Now, if this works on privacy extension addresses, it’s a problem because the IPv6 address could be harvested from outgoing connections and then attacked. If not, then scanning the IPv6 space is extremely hard and by default addresses are assigned randomly inside the /64 most people have assigned by their ISP means that the address space just within your own LAN is huge to scan.

      If it doesn’t work on privacy extension IPs, I would say the risk is very low, since the main IPv6 address is generally not exposed and would be very hard to find by chance.

      Here’s the big caveat, though. If these packets can be crafted as part of a response to an active outgoing TCP circuit/session. Then all bets are off. Because a popular web server could be hacked, adjusted to insert these packets on existing circuits/sessions in the normal response from the web server. Meaning, this could be exploited simply by visiting a website.

      • LaggyKar@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Harvesting IP addresses shouldn’t be a problem, since the firewall shouldn’t allow packets from a peer you haven’t talked to first. But true, if you can be attacked in response by a server you’re connecting to that would be bad.

      • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        What about torrenting through a VPN with IPv6? Would that make you vulnerable to this exploit?

        • r00ty@kbin.life
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          I think it depends on all the caveats I mentioned. If it could have worked with an outgoing connection, then someone with a bad client could execute it for sure. The VPN wouldn’t protect you.

      • Toribor@corndog.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        IPv6 firewalls should, by default, offer similar levels of security to NAT

        I think you’re probably right. We had decades of security experts saying that NAT is not a firewall and everyone on the planet treated it like one anyway. Now we’re overexposed for a no-NAT IPV6 internet.

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    206
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Hah! Joke’s on you. I accidentally restarted my PC and updated it without wanting to.

  • GluWu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I just updated and now my audio sounds like shit.

      • GluWu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        One restart post-update restarts changed it and helped, but something was still off. Took me like 30 minutes but it looks like my nvidia HDMI audio output got reset to a really low 16 bit sample rate. Got that set back to a decent 24 bit and its closer, but something is still off. I don’t think I had any settings/levels/enchanments.

        • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          Sounds like windows changed your audio driver. I’d download the most recent audio driver available through nvidia, then uninstall your current audio driver in device manager and manually install nvidias.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    Switch to Linux, be done with all of this Microsoft software nonsense

      • Derin@lemmy.beru.co
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I used to agree with this statement, but I’m no longer that sure.

        I built a new PC a week ago, installed windows first then Linux. The idea was that I needed Windows for gaming.

        Thought I’d try proton + Steam, regardless, just to see how it stacks up.

        No performance difference. HDR works through gamescope. The window manager of the DE isn’t insane and I can alt tab around my OS without problem.

        Pretty good stuff. Still have windows for work and Valorant, but otherwise I play all my games on Linux these days. The only part that’s lacking, in my opinion, is hot plugging controllers. Annoying that that doesn’t work.

      • Zetta@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Actually it is 100% that simple, proton has fixed gaming on Linux.

        It doesn’t work for a few rare games that install a rootkit on your Windows PC, but that’s already silly and irresponsible of you to allow a game to do anyway, in my opinion.

        • Random123@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Nearly all the games i play run worse on linux than windows. Counterstrike, the finals, vrising. Im sure at least one of them dont have rootkit installed. Even got glorious egg proton profiles and still no luck.

          • Zetta@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Counterstrike 2 is native to Linux, doesn’t use proton so should have 0 preforman impact

            • Random123@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Ill have to test counter strike 2 later today and see if its still runs poorly cause it could have been due to it being recently released when i tested CS2 out.

              Though just last night i was testing out the Finals and i noticed that the grqphics were significantly different from windows. In windows i had their polished texture and effects but in linux it was permanently foggy and the wall textures were super bad with shitty shadows.

              I tried replicating those textures and settings on windows but i wasnt able to. Im beginning to think the game is not using my graphics card.

              So in short; do you have any experience in this kind of issue with the graphics?

  • NaoPb@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m not running my computer with an IPv6 address. Only my modem has an IPv6 address. Does that mean I’m not affected?

    I’ll make sure to updats either way though.