We propose the symbol ⁂ to represent the fediverse.

⁂ is called an asterism. In astronomy, it refers to groups of stars in the sky, akin to constellations. We suggest that it’s a very fitting symbol for the fediverse, a galaxy of interconnected spaces which is decentralised and has an astronomically-themed name. It represents several stars coming together, connecting but each their own, without a centre.

@ is the symbol for e-mail. # is the symbol for hashtags. ☮ is the symbol for peace. ♻ is the symbol for recycling. ⁂ can be the symbol for the fediverse. ⁂ is standardised as Unicode U+2042, making it ready to copy and insert anywhere.

Git Repository: fediverse-symbol/fediverse-symbol

    • aasatru@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      So they touch upon it on their site:

      The pentagram icon is the original symbol for the fediverse, created back in 2018 by Dr. Quadragon and Eukombos. It’s a great depiction of the decentralised nature of the fediverse, and has been serving the community well. However, its design is a little too complex to be used at small sizes, as you would in text or in a button. It’s also only available in image form, not as a typographical character.

      I think they have a valid point. Currently on my website I use a Mastodon logo next to email and git and all that jazz. It’s not ideal, as it’s not so important that I’m on Mastodon specifically (and I might move to a self-hosted #Seppo instance in the future), but the existing fediverse icon would not work well at that scale.

      It’s a huge branding effort to make it catch on though. And part of me likes the pentagram better.

    • citrusface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      my friend, please read the article. it does a great job of explaining the why. it only takes a minute to read.

    • max@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      is said in webpage: the pentagram symbol is hard to distinguish at smaller typographicl sizes

        • max@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          4 months ago

          1 thats not how typography works

          2 im not webpage authour what u wan me to do about it moew?

      • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m reading this thread on mobile, and the fediverse logo next to the community name is much easier to see than the three stars. If I didn’t already know what the three stars were from the rest of the post, I wouldn’t have a clue what they were supposed to be in the body. They look like a blurry capital A.

        Obviously the fediverse logo is bigger there, which helps, but it’s not significantly bigger, and would still be clearer at a smaller size

    • arudesalad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      My guess is because it’s unicode. But that doesn’t really matter. How often are you going to want to put the icon instead of just typing the fediverse

        • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          “Fedi”

          Already more than 50% shorter.

          In comparison, asterism symbol (and any proposal that further extends into Unicode’s emoji area) still spends three, maybe four bytes.

          • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I… umm… yes, I will grant that in UTF-8 and perhaps UTF-16, it encodes to fewer bytes. But that doesn’t have anything to do with my point.