U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon declined to recuse herself from the case of Ryan Routh, who is charged with attempting to assassinate Donald Trump last month. The judge appointed to the federal bench by the alleged victim in Routh’s case brushed aside the defendant’s concerns about Trump’s praise of Cannon and the possibility that he could promote her to even higher office if he’s elected next week.
“I have no control over what private citizens, members of the media, or public officials or candidates elect to say about me or my judicial rulings,” Cannon wrote in an order published Tuesday. “I have never spoken to or met former President Trump except in connection with his required presence at an official judicial proceeding, through counsel,” added the judge who dismissed Trump’s classified documents case in July.
That dude is getting the entire courthouse thrown at him to prove her allegiance to Fussolini is completely unwavering, again.
Fussolini
*Trumpler
Pol Potbelly.
*GröpenFührer
Glad to see this one set loose out into the wild again 😜
It’s honestly perfect, it’s suplanted my previous name of choice, “Orange Julius”
And then he’ll get a favorable appeal.
Yep, she’ll do some unnecessarily bullshit to tip the scales, and accidentally cause an obviously guilty guy to walk after an appeal on procedural grounds.
For some reason, I’m not terribly torn up about that in this particular circumstance.
I mean, the guy is a piece of shit though, I’d rather him stay locked up instead of writing a book about how he tried to shoot the president.
It wouldn’t be the first time a dude showed up to a place with a gun wanting to kill people, killed people, and then got away with it scott free while conservative media fawned over him.
guy is a piece of shit
I’m not going to dispute that.
I’d rather him stay locked up
And that’s entirely fair. I’m just not particularly in favor of someone who tried to [do a silly little thing to] him being punished. So if he gets off scott-free, I won’t be particularly upset about it.
Cannon: Bias? That’s absurd. That’s an absurd reason to get in the way of my Supreme Court appointment.
Removed by mod
Racism and transphobia?
:/
Why is it always that same photo?
Is this better?
It’s the most punchable
Probably her official portrait? This is a judge, I don’t think you can just grab a random picture off her Facebook or whatever.
Is this not potential grounds for a mistrial and a solid appeal?
Yep. Dudes lawyer is probably telling him to go with the flow, knowing this is a perfect setup for mistral.
Eh, by the time this goes to trial Trump could be in office. Then, as day one dictator, Trump declarse anyone who helped Ukraine at all are wartime traitors, use the guy’s weird recruiting thing as evidence, and just summarily execute the guy.
Edit: she’s also on the short list to be AG. She may not even be a judge when this goes to trial.
Doubtful. For the same reason that Trump criticizing / threatening judges isn’t grounds for recusal or mistrial.
An appeal, sure.
But I doubt they’re going to get a mistrial on it. Dude is guilty as hell. Probably going to lead to reduced sentencing, though. (All though that’s still gonna be at “you’re fucked” levels,)
Edit: even if there is a mistrial, they’ll certainly be allowed to retry.
Right. A mistrial for easily avoidable reasons would be a waste of time and money.
The Dishonorable Aileen Qanon
There we go
Wait, he’s being charged with attempted assassination? Did he actually aim a gun at trump? Or was he just exercising his 2nd amendment rights?
It’s more of a concept of an attempt at an assassination
