Mastodon has been around since 2016 and has 804k MAU.

The platform has 57 third party apps.

The platform is decentralized and has community ran servers.

  • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    it’s been better marketed, and people struggle with the concept of federation and picking a server. and I guess the invite-only, artificial exclusivity strat has actually paid off for them initially, unlike for Google+.

    also, a matter of culture. I’ve seen many newcomers complain about how some long time users act as HOA, reminding everyone to act according to the long-standing rules. many people of colour have experience many forms of racist behaviour, too, which has driven some communities away.

    oh, and the federation/defederation business sometimes gets way too messy, which [cynic mode on] makes it difficult for people who want their Personal Brand™ to gain as many followers as possible over the entire network.

    • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      12 hours ago

      people struggle with the concept of federation and picking a server

      This is a HUGE reason. I didn’t know when I first signed up for Lemmy that I was on what is essentially a tankie instance. I didn’t know when I signed up for Pixelfed that I wasn’t going to be able to see shit because the first server I signed up for wasn’t really federated with anyone and I’ve mostly given up on it. I still can’t see a bunch of stuff on Mastodon without switching through several accounts with no rhyme or reason.

      I’ve said before that I obviously like it here because I’m using the services, but it’s not easy. Most people don’t know about the fediverse, and most of those that do want to be passive about maintaining their social media. Most of the fediverse is built for nerds.

      • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Mastodon relies on users setting the language their post is in manually, so if someone posts in two languages and forgets to switch between them, they don’t get filtered out. I know there are some other pieces of software that switch it automatically, I’m fairly sure Calckey automatically recognized the language you were writing in.

        • moe90@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I already toggle the Mastodon settings to ensure that I got the feeds to the language I want (I want English only) and I still got feeds on different languages such as German and French

          • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            again, if the person who is making the post doesn’t change the setting, it won’t get filtered. if they type a message in German but the post’s language option is set to English (which I think is the default on some major instances), it won’t get filtered out.

            you can usually check what their post’s setting is by starting writing a reply to them, as the language option of your post will switch to the one they post in.

            • moe90@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              13 hours ago

              That is why Mastodon is hard to get mainstream because not everyone wants extra effort to do this. Even, Twitter, threads and bluesky much better to filter their language content

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Average users do not even remotely care about federated software and/or decentralisation. That is techno-babble to them and their eyes will glaze over if you try to market that to them.

    That being said: Mastodon does a shit job at explaining how it works, how to use it, and what its advantages are. The Joinmastodon landing page just assumes you already know how a fair bit about instances work and what federated software is and does a very poor job explaining it. And even then, most users won’t care either way. They just want to click a Join button and be done.

    • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 hours ago

      That’s exactly what drove me into seeking out Lemmy instead. I hopped on Mastodon and it made me feel like I was being coralled into following some niche hobby forum exclusively, and I wasn’t into that. It didn’t explain that the instance itself was largely irrelevant and that the rest of the platform would open up to me after choosing one.

      Lemmy still had a learning curve, but having experience with reddit I was able to pick it up easily enough.

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    It’s shiny, they advertise, put in a money to spread the word. And the onboarding process probably is way easier?! Also back when Mastodon was in the media, it wasn’t yet the right time. Now, especially with Musk, it is. And the attention is on Bluesky since that is newer and what’s hyped right now.

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        I wouldn’t know, I have a lot of adblockers etc. But it gets to me via word of mouth. And it’s been in the media a lot this year. Due to their business decisions, new approach, novelty… That’s something they did very well. They also took care building some hype and anticipation with their invite-only period. Mastodon has also been in the news. But that was yesterday’s news and I suppose everyone forgets yesterday’s news.

  • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    57 different 3rd party apps is probably a good start. Mastodon has to be easy to on-board and it isn’t for someone with no technical understanding what domains, servers or instances are. To that group Bluesky makes sense. You are signing up for Bluesky. Try to onboard that group to mastodon and they don’t understand if they are on mastodon.social or mastodon.world or any other instance.

    Why would they be on one of those fringe services with less users than bluesky? That’s what a non expert understands

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Mastodon is a pain in the ass to get signed up for anyone under room temperature IQ, so, like, most of Twitter’s users, even the ones smart enough to leave.

  • Lightsong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 hours ago

    People like simple and easy to use.

    Bluesky got that, fediverse in general don’t have that.

  • hamFoilHat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I have a friend who has had a mastodon instance since it was gnu social, and there are two reasons I stopped using it.

    First, the UI sucks. He installed 3 or 4 different skins and they were all barely usable. I don’t want or need something flashy, xfce is my favorite windows manager, but it needs to at least work and not be confusing.

    Second, the people suck. It went from being okay to by the time I left I don’t think I was seeing any exchanges that didn’t have antisemitism or racism.

  • flamingos-cant@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    14 hours ago

    It has an algorithm that puts content in front of you, unlike Mastodon where it only puts what you ask for in your feed. I’m convinced that if Mastodon populated people with low following count’s feed with random posts it wouldn’t have bled as many users as it did.

  • BT_7274@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    11 hours ago

    You have to understand we are not normal users. Anyone even remotely interested in federated software are not normal users.

    Bluesky may not have 57 third party apps and that’s why people are flocking to it. It’s easy. The signup process through the app involved no selecting of servers, no understanding of what it actually is under the hood, and users are greeted by a default algorithm that feels very much like old Twitter before Musk.

    Basically, regular users do not care about the fediverse and just want a competent and polished app and site experience.

  • maplebar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    You want the bullshit “Mastodon is too complicated and hard to use!” answer or the real answer?

    BlueSky has rich people behind it.

    • _pi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      They’re the same answer.

      You need money to market applications to users. Bluesky is sold the same way that Twitter is, your favorite moron celebrity might hit like or retweet on your stuff.

      • maplebar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        They aren’t really the same answer.

        People suggest that Mastodon is too complicated for the average knuckle-dragging moron to use (and it might be, but frankly I consider that a pro, not a con) because it has “servers”, as if the entire point of the internet wasn’t to have a global network of communication across a multitude of clients and servers. Do these same people think the concept of websites and email are also too complex for the regular person? Maybe… But again, if the regular person is that fucking dumb do we really want have them in our community at all?

        What’s more, BlueSky is supposedly federated (or “will be”™), and as such it’ll have to deal with all of the same challenges around federation that Mastodon deals with, and people are kidding themselves if they think otherwise.

        Otherwise I agree with your last sentence. Social media is about money and fame, first and foremost. The average person will always go where the most money and fame are concentrated.

        • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Tbf the internet is entirely comprised of like 6 websites if you ask the average Joe, and I’m damn inclined to agree as someone who remembers webrings fondly and misses geocities (it’s like the bell curve meme lol, and btw yes I know about neocities I’m just sleeping on it).

          But I agree, if they can email they can mastodon, it’s the same shit.

  • glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’ve got an idea as to why.

    I went to mastodon.social and see a Linux meme, some heavy political commentary, and a bunch of posts about mastodon being better than Twitter.

    I then went to bluesky.app and see some political riffing, cute animals, a comic, some jokes, a company, and even Don Lemon.

    The average person checking them both out for the first time, mastodon is nerd shit and Bluesky is normal shit.

  • Adam@doomscroll.n8e.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’m dabbling in Bluesky atm. Having run my own Masto server for over a year at this point. Here’s things I’ve found that Bluesky does just plain better - mostly cause it’s not beholden to the whims of the ActivityPub protocol.

    • Shows me all replies to any post I happen to come across.
    • Lets me see all posts about things I happen to search/look for, including hashtags.
    • I don’t have to worry about being unable to see content I haven’t personally blocked (not so much of an issue on a small/single server like mine though).
    • I can repost things (not actually too bothered with this one but many people want it).
    • I can set per post reply permissions to a very granular level (no-one, mentioned, followers, specific followers)
    • It handles video in a way that works i.e. I can post them, and people can watch them with minimal buffering/waiting.
    • Gives me access to community built collections/algorithms that expose the content I want to see.
    • It defaults to providing an additional feed driven by what the people I’m following are liking/interacting with.
    • Finally, a big one for new users, it provided a default feed of content when I first logged in so that I had something to look at.

    The first two are huge on a small/single user server. By default we get nothing, following a single account will get us the content of just that account and the replies that they happen to reply to. A post may get 200 replies, but unless I go looking on the original server I will see a fraction of that. Technical solutions exist to help with this but the Fediverse’s penchant for privacy and control (quite rightly) limits the effectiveness (Fedifetcher, GetMoarFedi).

    3 is something most people won’t think about. But if they become aware they’re not seeing something they thought they’d be able to they then have to deep dive into who’s defederating who and why.

    Most all the other points just make the whole thing a much more seamless experience for your average user. Bootstrapping a list of people to follow on a small server is hard (I’d absolutely recommend creating a Fediverse account somewhere large first to build up some sort of list before migrating)