Yeah, both sides amiright?

  • Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I loved having people arguing with me and saying “At least my conscience is clear.”

    How’s your conscience now??? Still feeling good about your decision?

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I loved having people arguing with me and saying “At least my conscience is clear.”

      How’s your conscience now??? Still feeling good about your decision?

      There is a certain set of dumbasses that will say this kind of thing no matter what.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      They think they get to wipe their hands of it because they “didn’t participate”, refusing to concede that said choice still counts as their participation. Through ignorance, cruelty, and/or privilege, they’ll blame everyone else for the state of the world while refusing to do their part.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Howard Zinn - you can’t be neutral on a moving train. The Enlightened Centrists ™ always look like suuuuuch dipshits when they talk about “both sides”.

        • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Howard Zinn would not support the genocide of Palestinians nor voting for genociders, nor is withholding a vote neutrality. Zinn was forcefully against the War on Vietnam before it was acceptable in liberal academic circkes and drew a hard line on it.

          Have you read his books?

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      How’s your conscience now??? Still feeling good about your decision?

      Yes.

      Trump is an irredeemably evil genocidal psychopath who deserves eternal torture in the deepest circle of hell. That fact does not make me wish that I had voted for a different irredeemably evil genocidal psychopath who deserves eternal torture in the deepest circle of hell. The fact that Trump is horrible was never in dispute.

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Oh, I didn’t say that. Not all irredeemably evil genocidal psychopaths who deserve eternal torture in the deepest circle of hell are exactly as bad.

          • tired_n_bored@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            48 minutes ago

            But it means your vote could have helped bring the victory to someone less genocidal.

            I know Harris is not a pro-Palestine person, but she’s someone we could have talked to and could have felt the pressure of her voters. At the very least she doesn’t support the annexation of the West Bank and Gaza, unlike Trump, who couldn’t give less of a shit about Palestinians and is happy if Israel leveled them down

            P.S. I don’t want to make you feel guilty. The political system the US people live in is a shit. I’m just disappointed that maybe she could have had a chance of winning if people didn’t abstain.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              31 minutes ago

              she’s someone we could have talked to and could have felt the pressure of her voters.

              No, she absolutely isn’t.

              Politicians are never more receptive to voters’ concerns than just before an election. Once they have people’s votes, they tend to shift further in the direction of interests groups and the establishment. Like, for example, on the campaign trail, Obama promised to end mass surveillance and protect whistleblowers, but once he was in office, he did the opposite. Harris on the campaign trail, after the widespread campus protests, was the most pro-Palestine she would ever be, which is to say not even the slightest bit and completely unconditionally supportive of material aid to Israel.

              It used to be that politicians would promise to do good things on the campaign trail, and then usually not follow through. But now they don’t even have to promise anything, because people will just project whatever views and values they hold onto whichever candidate they like regardless of anything they say or do.

              Harris and Biden are unconditionally supportive of everything Israel does. Short of direct involvement of the US military, it’s not really possible for Trump to be meaningfully worse than that.

              • tired_n_bored@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 minutes ago

                Okay I understand your point. Unfortunately Palestinians are not the only targeted ones. We have

                • LGBTQ people
                • Atheists and non-Christians
                • Leftists and pro-democracy people. Non-fascists in general
                • Scientists
                • Ukrainians
                • Refugees and immigrants

                Harris said and has showed to support them. Trump vowed to destroy all of them.