Let’s welcome the new moderators of c/politics.

  • AToM.exe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    20 years old, no job, far right and emotional unstable. I think we got the perfect candidate!

    • aidan@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Although, I am curious what gave you that impression? Same with the emotionally unstable part.

      • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mean you have different opinions and thought processes then the mainstream man, it doesn’t need much more than that

      • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “They’re not christofascists, they’re Christian moralists” ^^1 is a disturbingly far right position post Charlottesville, Dobbs, and all the state laws persecuting trans people that have been passed recently.

        I will say, I haven’t seen a moderation level action yet that seems horribly wrong, but I feel like that’s only going to be a matter of time

        ^^1 Paraphrased, not a direct quote

        e; I apparently can’t figure out superscript text

        • aidan@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Charlottesville people are largely fascists, but they also don’t have that much influence in American politics. Dobbs is not a fascist position. I personally support abortion access- but there is nothing in the Constitution to protect it. As for state laws persecuting trans people I actually have looked that much into what’s passed, I’ve just seen rhetoric. Can you point me to some of the laws that’re chrisofascist?

          • BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you have a table of 10 people, and a Nazi sits down and joins them without them kicking him out, you now have a table with 11 Nazis at it.

              • BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Chomsky has some great takes on certain topics. He’s phenomenal at linguistics, and his analysis of propaganda systems in the US is paralleled only by Parenti. Unfortunately, he also holds some contradictory viewpoints to what he espouses. You cannot tolerate intolerance. Period. Having a different view is not the same as being a Nazi. It’s not merely a difference of opinion. Your right to free speech stops where my face begins. You don’t have the right to advocate for my murder, as they did in Charlottesville, and accepting that as an opinion would mean inherently abandoning the belief that human rights are universal.

                • aidan@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I disagree. You can oppose a murder without murdering them. In the same way, those who oppose certain rights of others must be opposed but not persecuted, not only because they’d become a martyr- but because even though I strongly disagree their beliefs and in my opinion are clearly wrong that doesn’t exactly matter to whether I can talk to them about programming over lunch.

                  Your right to free speech stops where my face begins.

                  What does this mean?

                  and accepting that as an opinion would mean inherently abandoning the belief that human rights are universal.

                  An opinion can be disgusting and abhorrent and still be an any opinion. Nazism clearly is an opinion- an abhorrent opinion that rejects human life and human rights, yet still an opinion. Just like someone can have an opinion that murdering as many people as possible is good.

                  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Nazism clearly is an opinion- an abhorrent opinion that rejects human life and human rights, yet still an opinion. Just like someone can have an opinion that murdering as many people as possible is good.

                    If nazis are welcome in a community, no one else is.

          • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The Charlottesville people are largely fascists

            They were all fascists, and everything else you said is, at best, so deeply ignorant that I don’t think I’ve got the time or mental energy to point out how dumb and dangerous this refusal to see what should be obvious to everyone is. I strongly encourage you to step down as a moderator of this community and strongly encourage anyone who approved your being made a mod to do the same.

            • aidan@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              They were all fascists

              Every single one there? I do not think you could possibly know that.

              dumb and dangerous this refusal to see what should be obvious to everyone is.

              Ironically what I said in my mod application is:

              “I fully accept that people can and do hold opposing opinions to me, yet might be smarter, more informed, or more moral than me. I may still disagree with them but being wrong isn’t evil.”

              Do you think I(or anyone) could disagree with you on anything without you automatically assuming they are less informed, stupider, or evil?

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Every single one there? I do not think you could possibly know that.

                The counterprotesters weren’t. If you’re marching and nazis show up to march with you and you don’t drive them off or leave yourself, you’re ok marching with nazis. The term for someone who is ok marching with nazis is “a nazi.”

                • aidan@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  So the German Communist Party were Nazis?

                  After the Nazi electoral breakthrough in the 1930 Reichstag election, the SPD proposed a renewed united front with the KPD against fascism but this was rejected.[25]

                  In the early 1930s, the KPD cooperated with the Nazis in attacking the social democrats, and both sought to destroy the liberal democracy of the Weimar Republic.[26] They also followed an increasingly nationalist course, trying to appeal to nationalist-leaning workers.[4][27]

                  In 1931, the party reported a membership of 200,000.[28]

                  The KPD leadership initially first criticised but then supported the 1931 Prussian Landtag referendum, an unsuccessful attempt launched by the far-right Stahlhelm to bring down the social democrat state government of Prussia by means of a plebiscite; the KPD referred to the SA as “working people’s comrades” during this campaign.[29]

                  In this period, while also opposed to the Nazis, the KPD regarded the Nazi Party as a less sophisticated and thus less dangerous fascist party than the SPD, and KPD leader Ernst Thälmann declared that “some Nazi trees must not be allowed to overshadow a forest [of social democrats]”.[30] In February 1932, Thälmann argued that “Hitler must come to power first, then the requirements for a revolutionary crisis [will] arrive more quickly”. In November 1932, the KPD and the Nazis worked together in the Berlin transport workers’ strike.

                  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Wow. Neat pro-nazi talking points. Do you think this is a good look for the moderation team?

                    I’d say the German Communist Party didn’t know any better and learned the hard way what happens when you welcome nazis. It’s interesting how none of your examples are from after 1932. I wonder what could have happened in 1933 that caused the sudden cutoff.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The Charlottesville people are largely fascists, but they also don’t have that much influence in American politics.

            The president at the time called them “very fine people” because he was scared of alienating them.

            • aidan@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think he more likely believed there were some non-nazis in the group seeing as he in the same quote said I condemn neo-nazis and white supremacists dozens of times

                • aidan@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I mean, none of us can speak to what someone else believes. I don’t think Trump puts that much thought into what he says to intentionally not say something to avoid alienating voters.

          • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The constitution itself protects it. It’s called penumbral reasoning.

            The idea that we set up a limited government that could also come into people’s homes and legislate family planning decisions is absurd to the point of stupidity.

            • aidan@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              1 year ago

              I agree there an many unenumerated rights, but I understand the argument that there is nothing indicating that the is any more protected than bodily autonomy when it comes to drugs, or how you raise your children, etc. But, I am of the belief that drug use and abortion could definitely be considered protected rights. I just understand the perspective of those who disagree.

      • AToM.exe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        https://lemmy.world/comment/1093566

        Yeah I guess. I’ve only been able to get internships- good internships. But I’ve never been able to get a real job

        Maybe I misinterpreted that.

        What’s with all the comments about closing public schools and calling clearly fascist movements as “christian moralists”.

        • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I see you are a @aidan fan. Here is the thing, we all will have different interpretations of political viewpoints. This isn’t a open forum for only progressives, conservatives, liberals, moderates, or whatever, it is a shared forum open to different perspectives. You don’t have to agree or disagree with anyone’s points, but we are one community and everyone’s voice can be heard (as long as it doesn’t violate the rules or lemmy.world TOS). That is why having aiden is a great asset to the team. Moderators are rarely liked, but we value his commitment to growing the community and providing insight and perspective.

          • AToM.exe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Exactly what I wanted to hear.

            I hope this place stays open-minded and free to discuss different viewpoints. Even if I don’t agree with certain views of one member of the mod team, I’m ok with that. As long as it doesn’t influence who can post their opinion.

            Thanks for your comment and…

            well, we’ll see in the future.

        • aidan@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Currently working a good internship. Also, talk about stalking!

          Edit: I also never advocated closing public schools. I advocated making them voluntary.

          Edit 2: I have also been offered a few jobs but are not feasible for me since I want to live near my partner.

          • AToM.exe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I wouldn’t consider it stalking but a background-check.

            This community could (/will) become the biggest political forum on the web. Wouldn’t you want to know who moderates it?

            You can go through my post history, nothing to hide. I don’t consider it stalking but a feature.

            We will follow your journey with great interest.

            • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              I wouldn’t consider it stalking but a background-check.

              And why does dissent automatically fail the background check in your book?

            • aidan@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              1 year ago

              Of course you’re free to, it’s just I’d argue a rude thing to do to instead of judging someones actions you criticized them for being vulnerable in a completely different context days ago.

          • Locuralacura@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s a traditional right wing position to defund public schools. Right now : ‘House Republicans want to cut Title I funding by 80%’

            If you don’t know, title 1 funding is money for the poorest public schools. The money is often used for nutrition programs, resource educators, special education teachers and Education assistants.

            I think you might be too young and inexperienced to be an unbiased moderator.

            • aidan@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s a traditional right wing position to defund public schools.

              Largely yes.

              I think you might be too young and inexperienced to be an unbiased moderator.

              Judge based on action, you very clearly broke rule 3 to insult me because I disagreed with you on this exact issue. You then said I should be removed from being a moderator, not because of an action but because I disagreed on this issue. I’m sorry idk what to tell you other than watch the modlogs.