• Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    The gun rights y’all have?

    Now, most people would tell you that Gun Control Works and that you should just do that and get less dead kids per month which is a generally good thing.

    … But here’s another thing to consider. As long as you’re allowed to purchase weapons for cheap and easy.

    You do realise you can in fact do something about the assholes in your government and your oligarchies with those guns, right? That they can be used for more than just killing children?

    Luigi Mangione seemed to get it.

  • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    All of your sitcoms are crap. The same recycled gags over and over. Unpleasant people who hate each other snarking, saying “oh my god” and then explaining their jokes.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      Unregulated capitalism*

      Capitalism in and of itself is a turbo charger for the economy, but like a real turbo charger it need regulations to not destroy itself and the engine.

      • metaStatic@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 days ago

        that’s a pretty good metaphor but assumes regulatory capture isn’t baked into the cake and pulling up the ladder after consolidating all the wealth isn’t the entire point.

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          You are absolutely right, my comment assumed regulation and acting in good faith.

          I am mainly just so tired of everyone just going “capitalism bad”, when that is not the single answer.

          Eradicating capitalism would be terrible and idiotic.

          I am a firm believer in a social democratic system with a well regulated free market.

          • metaStatic@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            You’re correct that everything is being held up by capitalism right now so if you remove it then everything collapses. We need to build alternative structures to hold things up before making any attempt on the current system, which should be as simple as using the alternatives instead but power was never given up without a fight.

            I think market systems in general lead to exploitation and democracy is just the tyranny of the majority. We can do better and we should do better.

            • rammer@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              Democracy doesn’t have to be a tyranny of the majority. In its purest form it is. And that is why constitutional republics ensure citizen’s rights in their constitutions. We need a similar system for economy.

              A sketch of that would a be a system where you’d have constitutional republic with independent legislature, judiciary and executive branches. Separated from the economic players as well as possible. They would provide the the outer bounds of a level playing field. Economy would a market economy, where ownership of companies would be distributed among the stakeholders of the system workers, customers and the executive. Similar to how governments ideally function. Workers would have “legislative” power in the company. They would be responsible for company policy. Executives would implement those policies. Customers would decide how well the company performs by either buying their products or withholding their patronage. This would need a lot of guard rails in place. But this would prevent centralization of power in the hands of an “owner”-class.

              Transitioning to this type of system would not be that difficult. As most of what it has is already there. In western democracies. At least on paper. There would be a lot of resistance to this from the “owner”-class. I have no doubt of that.

    • rammer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      For a growing economy with an excess of people and resources it’s pretty good.

      Our current world, not so much.

      The problem is that there isn’t a currently viable alternative.

      • metaStatic@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Capitalist realism is a bitch.

        There are plenty of viable alternatives; in isolation. The real problem is that capital will always intervene before an alternative can get a foothold.

    • kalkulat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Nothing new to that. In 1886 case Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad, the US Supreme Court declared that companies are people too. With the same rights — under the 14th amendment.

  • steeznson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    You wasted your chance as a hyper-power. The Soviet Union had fallen and the world was essentially yours but you did nothing with it. Now India and China are rising powers and you are going back to being a regular super-power.

  • EgoNo4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    144
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    We can’t understand how millions can vote for a senile, convicted sexual predator as president…

    • kalkulat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Hah! Let’s make a list of the countries where leadership of that ilk has never existed. (We’ll just ignore that most of them did not allow elections.) Won’t take much paper.

    • Meltrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      88
      ·
      7 days ago

      Dude half of us don’t understand it either.

      It’s amazing what decades of defunding education will do when you mix it with a healthy dose of conservative talk show TV and social media algorithms.

        • Meltrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 days ago

          I guess it’s much less than half.

          About 1/7 are less than voting age. Another 1/7 or so voted for the oompa loompa, and another 1/7 voted against. So actually, about half of the population just doesn’t vote because they’re a different type of idiot.

          I do hate it here, for what it’s worth.

      • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        7 days ago

        I dunno, i understand it pretty well. Lack of education, lead paint/gasoline, nationalism, fascism, racism, sexism, economic disparity, lack of healthcare to deal with neural degeneracy common in trump supporters, and finally lower borth rates among the more educated. America is a shithole, and has been for the past 40 years at least. Until we finally grow a spine and start “adjusting”, things are going to continue getting worse until were all dead and the olligarchs own everything. Then theyll move on to fucking the rest of the world (harder than they already are)

        • Meltrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          Was with you to the last bit. What does it mean to “grow a spine and start ‘adjusting’”? Why is “adjusting” in quotes?

            • Meltrax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              Great, thanks. I want to know what OP actually wants us to do. I hate the situation we were in and I sure as shit didn’t vote for this asshole the first or second time, but other than voting and trying to survive what exactly do you want us to do to “get our shit together”.

      • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        I wonder how differently the last US election would have played out if Murdoch had died before campaign season

        Going to have a big party when he finally goes and joins Reagan in hell

    • spacecadet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Welcome to every election, not just presidential and not just a Republican or Democrat problem. Trump is disgusting but Seattles former mayor was way worse and didn’t get a peep nationwide.

  • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Affordable healthcare

    Public transit

    Civilian oversight

    Prisoner rehabilitation

    Universal income

    Free education

    Separation of religion and state

    Wealth taxes

    Law enforcement accountability

    Environmental regulations…

    • spacecadet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      7 days ago

      Varies state to state and city to city, but my city has the majority of that list… plus the freedom of speech is nice. When I read the news about people in Europe going to prison for comments online but getting slapped on the wrist for violent crimes I’m baffled.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        The thing is that the US also does not have 100% free speech.

        You can absolutely get arrested in the US for shouting “FIRE!” In a crowded area.

        Regarding punishment for violent crimes seeming low in Europe, that is mainly due to us focusing on rehabilitation rather than revenge. However change is comming, we are moving to longer punishments.

        If I got to decide, we would have a system where we focus on rehab for the first X times a person commits a crime, when it has been shown that the person does not want to change, then they are put in containment prisons, they are less nice, and focus on containment firstly, rehab secondly.

        • spacecadet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          7 days ago

          The small brained “you can’t yell fire in a movie theater” argument so we don’t have free speech is the intellectual equivalent of Jeff Bezos is poor because he drives a ‘93 Honda civic.

          • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Yet that is exactly your argument, that only the US has free speech because Europe puts people in jail for online comments, without regard to what those comments are, it’s the equivalent to saying the US jails people for speaking in the movie theaters in the fire example.

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Free speech doesn’t not mean freedom from consequences.

          Example. If you tell someone to kill someone else, and they do it, you will be charged with a crime. Free speech means that you can voice your views, and the government (not private corporations btw) is not allowed to restrict it. That’s why you can still read Luigi’s manifesto, or the Unabomber’s. It’s why you can still publish and read the Articles of the Confederacy, or the Anarchist’s Cookbook.

      • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Oh really? I would like to know which city is that so I can confirm, but I seriously doubt you have most of that list since that’s regulated on state or federal level.

        Also we have freedom of speech in Europe, but you obviously can’t incite violence, the same is true in the US, going online and trying to get people to bomb a building filled with gays or immigrants is hate speech and will get you arrested in most civilized countries.

        • kinship@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          I gut upvoted you because I want to confirm your point of view, it resonates with me. But you are asking the guy to doxx himself for an internet argument, besides maybe where he lives isn’t so bad and he wanted to express his sentiment.

          • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            Yes, I don’t expect him to answer, even though just naming a city where you lived or have lived before is not doxxing yourself, it is personal information that I understand someone not wanting to share.

            That being said, his claim was that his city had most of a list of things, you can’t make that claim and not expect to divulge the city, he could have hidden the fact that it was where he lived or had lived before by saying “X city has most of that” which would have allowed him to give verifiable information about his claim without doxxing themselves. But as it is it sounds like the person who swears he has a girlfriend who lives in another country and has natural blue hair, but no one has ever seen her.

    • babybus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      6 days ago

      Separation of religion and state

      I cringe every time their president or other politicians are talking about god. It’s unbelievable how backward the US are in this regard.

  • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    Your (as in Americans) Imperial system of Units & measurements is a big joke & you are a British colony & you have bad cars

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Peace:

      “Vision of Humanity 2024 Global Peace Index ranked 132nd out of 162 countries”

      …yup. sounds about right. We’ve been at some kind of war for pretty much the entirety of our existence…

        • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          The winning or losing was almost always secondary. The main thing is to spend a load of money on wars. We’ve never failed at that.

          • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Military skill was a use it or lose it thing. I wouldn’t be surprised if all of the wars that the US has been fighting have been intentional, specifically in order to maintain skilled soldiers.

            • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Government spending in the Military Industrial Complex is the point.

              An able militia military is a side effect.

          • Maeve@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Destabilizing other countries and exploitation of natural resources and cheap labor, in order to maintain USD and military hegemony. That’s why.