Summary

TikTok faces a U.S. shutdown by Jan. 19 unless the Supreme Court delays or blocks a law requiring its Chinese parent, ByteDance, to divest.

The Biden administration defends the law as a national security measure, citing potential risks of Chinese government influence. Content creators argue it violates free speech.

Donald Trump, once a supporter of the ban, seeks a delay to reach a “political resolution.”

A shutdown could cost TikTok millions of users and revenue. The court’s decision, due soon, could reshape U.S. digital speech policy.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      The best possible outcome would have been a digital bill of rights that applies to all social media. Please step outside the Amazon box youre thinking out of.

  • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Why is everything so glacially slow anymore. Fucking do something! I’ve been hearing about the demise of TiKTok for like three YEARS. Die already. Or don’t, I’m just sick of hearing about how it “might close” any fucking day now.

      • MetalMachine@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        You’re absolutely right. But the palestine issue pushed it over the edge. I forgot who exactly from the israeli camp but they said “we lost a whole generation”

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Idk, I think all these governments having trade and tech wars is bad for our freedom. But on the other hand, TikTok is pure misinformation slop.

        • IamAnonymous@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          That’s not how freedom is defined in the constitution though. We are not in China or North Korea but are heading in that direction.

              • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                24 hours ago

                What is it, the sixty-ninth amendment?

                ‘An unregulated internet, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear apps, shall not be infringed’?

                • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  This just in, nothing ever changes. Black people are still 3/5th of a person, women don’t have the right to vote, the vice president is 2nd place winner, and people don’t elect senators.

            • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              I don’t think the government has the right to control what you do in your private time on your private device.

              1st amendment is right to free press and right to free speech. Several amendments imply a right to privacy from the government, such as the 3rd 4th and 9th.

              The government should not regulate how I make my speech. That’s ridiculous to give them the right to remove how people are allowed to speak.

              Good to know people are willing to give themselves more chains to a fascist Trump government if they don’t like the UI of an app.

                • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  Cool, so why stop there! Just make it so they always have access to my phone! Why would I need the right to use anything I want?

                  The government now needs needs me to get court approval to speak my mind to Trump. Require paperwork just to develop an app.

                  Surely nothing bad will happen if we just let this pot of water rise with frogs advocating it to get hotter.

              • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                20 hours ago

                I don’t think the government has the right to control what you do in your private time on your private device.

                [Laughs in War in Drugs.]

        • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          maybe people don’t need as much freedom as they think they do.

          The quiet part is a bit loud here my blue conservative friend.

  • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is there anything stopping them from just renaming the company and rebranding it to avoid this? I could care less if it goes away or not, but I am curious how easily it could be to just rename yourself or if that’s actually covered somehow in this. Even still, I feel like there will definitely be loopholes that they can do to skate around it?

    • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      21 hours ago

      All they need to do is literally sell the American branch to a US company - even one they set up themselves.

      The reason that they won’t do this is because a US founded company has to play by different rules than a Chinese company can.

  • DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    so basically, if tiktok prevails, they were able to bribe uncle tom & co enough to outbid their competition. if not, the competition outbid tiktok.