• sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Remember this when tell you that there is nothing they can do about US health care system.

    Taxpayers love doing charity, the parasites need more anyway🤡

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      The question is absolutely clear: How can we get rid of paying people for work?

      It’s a two-step approach: There are the low-skill jobs that could get replaced by machines, with desperate people flooding the markets, putting downward pressure on peoples’ incomes, and there are the high-skill jobs where currently not enough staff is available - at least when one does not want to pay suitable rates.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      The bots will do all the fun stuff, so humans can work 12-16 hour ultra-hardcore shifts in factories owned by the American oligarchs.

  • Bieren@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    If the models are trained from twitter. We are more fucked than we already are. Only thing it would prosper at is racism and bigotry.

  • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    You are now picturing Trump’s face inside the stargate from Stargate SG-1.

    You are welcome.

  • Australis13@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    1 month ago

    This sounds like a really bad idea:

    The “most charismatic” application of AI, said Ellison, would pertain to electronic health records, which would let doctors monitor best practices in far flung places. For instance, a doctor in Indian River reservation would be able to see how a doctor at Memorial Sloan Kettering would a treat a patient, he said.

    Do we really want to give a black box unfettered access to everyone’s medical records? It’s a privacy and security nightmare waiting to happen.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 month ago

      As someone who works in a HIPAA oriented field in biotech: yeah. There are many excellent reasons why we are Absolutely Not Allowed to point an LLM at any PHI/PII database. But fuck the rules I guess, because that’s the era we’re entering. All gas no brakes. What could go wrong.

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Keep in mind that the people advocating for AI in all kinds of fields without good reason now are the very same people who never liked the privacy rules in the first place.

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        IRL Cyberpunk, let’s gooo.

        Guess, some people did not get, that this is a dystopian world.

  • futatorius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    In other words, a massive handout of taxpayer money to the tech bros for nothing worthwhile.

    • palordrolap@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Why did you cross out a word and then write a synonym right afterwards? I’d put an /s here, but well…

      When politicians talk about “the country”, whatever country they happen to be in charge of, they almost always mean the parts of the country that they think are important to the total exclusion of everything else. Or what they’ve been bribed to think of as important. Either way, that usually means “the rich, the important, and their agendas”.

      Likewise “the economy” is “the rich people’s yacht fund”.

      (This latter one I stole from a viral tweet.)

  • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    And so it has started. The endless series of headlines that all begin with the same boring name.

    I’m going to downvote every single one.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      And as more progressive-leaning people showed their distaste for GenAI, Meta started to moderate hate speech even less on its platforms, pushed the right even more, etc.

    • qaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Perhaps less so if in a couple months it turns out that the contract went to one of Musk’s companies. Having a large amount of money to spend on something intangible can also be very useful.