Summary

The Trump administration has upended USAID by abruptly freezing foreign aid spending and placing senior career officials on administrative leave, halting crucial disbursements.

The administration has implemented a 90-day freeze affecting life-saving programs such as PEPFAR and malaria initiatives, severely disrupting vital operations and international health efforts.

The administration’s impoundment strategy, widely rejected by courts, seeks to reclassify civil servants and contractors, undermining accountability and jeopardizing essential aid operations.

Critics warn that these moves create a climate of intimidation, endangering effective foreign aid delivery and weakening critical diplomatic and humanitarian efforts.

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    What lawsuits are being brought over this? The president does not have the authority to just not spend money Congress has appropriated.

    • OCATMBBL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      Without enforcement of law, no law throttles him. He’s a dictator now, so rules are our the window.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      How do you figure? Congress has budgeted, that doesn’t mean it has to be spent as far as I know.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Previously most Congresses would act to preserve their constitutional authority, even versus an executive from the same party and whose goals they align with. Usually people act in their own self-interest. Usually a politician guards his power. Somehow this self-preservation or self-interest is gone. Somehow they also are surprised that the face-eating leopard is feasting on their carcasses

      It’s up to congress, but they’re choosing to get their faces eaten

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Don’t kid yourself, Congress has been ceding power for centuries.

        Human nature is to follow a single strong leader who assures them they can solve their problems.

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I think there was a fundamental misunderstanding by the founders about self-interested parties and balancing power.

        In feudal societies many barons were happy to serve a king so long as the king kept them in power. They don’t necessarily need all the power to be satiated, just lording over their fiefdom is sufficient. This is basically what the US congress has become. They’ve realized that the president has out-sized power and as long as the president is on their side then they mutually benefit.

        The president just needs to keep the keys to power happy.