erotador@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 5 months agogender nruletrallemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square54linkfedilinkarrow-up1849arrow-down112 cross-posted to: flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
arrow-up1837arrow-down1imagegender nruletrallemmy.blahaj.zoneerotador@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square54linkfedilink cross-posted to: flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
minus-squareRachelhazideas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up25arrow-down1·5 months agoMake the term ‘man’ gender neutral and make ‘maleman’ the new word for male humans. Then we can have ‘mailmaleman’.
minus-squareBorgDrone@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 months agoOr just use ‘person’ instead of ‘man’. Then it doesn’t matter if someone is a person or a woperson.
minus-squarefestnt@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·5 months agobut could female humans be called femaleman?
minus-squareporous_grey_matter@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 months agoThat’s more or less what it historically was
Make the term ‘man’ gender neutral and make ‘maleman’ the new word for male humans. Then we can have ‘mailmaleman’.
Or just use ‘person’ instead of ‘man’. Then it doesn’t matter if someone is a person or a woperson.
but could female humans be called femaleman?
That’s more or less what it historically was