The United States has announced the approval of the sale of more than $7.4bn in bombs, missiles and related equipment to Israel, which has used American-made weapons to devastating effect during the war in Gaza.

The state department has signed off on the sale of $6.75bn in bombs, guidance kits and fuses, in addition to $660m in Hellfire missiles, according to the US Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA).

The proposed sale of the bombs “improves Israel’s capability to meet current and future threats, strengthen its homeland defense, and serves as a deterrent to regional threats”, the DSCA said in a statement.

  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 天前

    While I don’t disagree, I feel like we need to talk more about how disconnected the Democratic Party is from what their base actually wants. Them being diet republicans ain’t cutting it

    • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 小时前

      Agreed, but the roar of such sentiment just prior to the election that immediately died out tells you most people saying that didn’t actually believe it.

      Those who do kept their mouths shut until after the election, because we knew doing otherwise would just elect Trump.

    • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 天前

      True. But at the same time you’re not going to get any of that by not voting and letting Republicans get elected. I mean get you butts out there and primary these centrist lead weights.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        17 小时前

        If the DNC allowed that y’all wouldn’t be in this mess in the first place. I mean hello? 2020 was four years ago.

        • peregrin5@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          12 小时前

          No they’d rather sit on the couch and complain that the dinosaurs are dinosauring and won’t switch to communist revolution like they believe everyone wants, even though they’ve never left the couch.

          If they actually went out and tried to become local politicians to effect change they would probably see that their ideals are far less popular in real life among normal people outside of the terminally online crowd.

          • hark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 小时前

            Ah yes, the “pull yourself up by the bootstraps” argument for electoralism. It doesn’t matter who we vote for when they get laundered through the lobbying machine on the highest setting after or even before they get into office. Tell me, who is at the top of this list? https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/summary?code=Q05&cycle=All&ind=Q05&recipdetail=M

            I’m saying this as someone who has voted democrats straight down the ballot in every election I could. It doesn’t work when money is more powerful than any vote.

            • peregrin5@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 小时前

              Money is only this powerful because people didn’t vote when it mattered to keep money out of politics.

              • hark@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                33 秒前

                Both democrats and republicans are in line with neoliberal thought about letting corporations get bigger and bigger and giving more freedom to capital than to people. A simple vote isn’t going to change this. Let’s pretend that democrats are opposed to money in politics, you’d have to vote them in every single time because there aren’t singular times when it’d matter since the assault on democracy is ever-present. This is impossible under the two-party system. Things will go wrong and people will blame whoever is in power. Things are constantly getting worse which is why we’re seeing this more frequent swapping of parties in power.

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        15 小时前

        Fix what exactly? It isn’t that the democrats are a new party that suddenly popped into existence for the last election. They’ve been doing this shit forever.

          • Maalus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            13 小时前

            No, it isn’t. But acting as if democrats were / are willing to change and listen to the people is extremely naive. That’s the reason Bernie Sanders was never allowed to be a candidate despite being one of the most popular dems out there. There needs to be a third way / party that does better and claws out the democrats from ever being able to win.

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 小时前

              Bernie Sanders WAS a presidential candidate in multiple primaries. He LOST those primaries by a HUGE MARGIN.

              And then HE PROMOTED THE CANDIDATES WHO WON AND WE DIDN’T LISTEN TO HIM.

              • hark@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 小时前

                They let non-party-favored candidates run in the primaries just like how this kid is allowed to mow the law

                • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 小时前

                  In 2020 Biden got 19 Million votes and Bernie got 9 Million

                  Are you saying it was all a big scheme and that it was all fake? You think tens of millions of voters choices don’t matter?

                • peregrin5@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 小时前

                  Maybe start at the local level and build a community of like minded people to form a cohort to enact change instead of trying to start at the top and then throwing a tantrum when you don’t get your way after putting in none of the work or effort to better the party from the ground up like all the other established politicians have.

    • Klear@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 小时前

      I feel like we need to talk more about how disconnected the Democratic Party is from what their base actually wants

      Did you feel this need before the election too? Because a lot of people did and that is who we’re talking about here.

      • JordanFalcon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 小时前

        Democrats lost because they didn’t embrace populist rhetoric.

        If they just ran someone like Bernie they could have won. People are tired of the status quo and they thought Trump would be a way out of it. All democrats run on is “we’ll keep things the same”.

        • tree_frog@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          17 小时前

          Left populism is popular. Center right positions coming from the Democrats are not.

          Would you like fascism or diet fascism? Uhh… Neither. So I guess I will just stay home and not vote

          (Actually, I did vote. But I can understand why a lot of people weren’t motivated to).

    • peregrin5@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      13 小时前

      Have you actually looked at their platform? Or are you just repeating “Republican lite” because that’s what all your social circle says?

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 小时前

        This kind of feels like a loaded question, but yeah, I’d prefer it be more progressive. I’d like for Nancy and the other old guard to accept that they’ve got to move out of the way for the next generation to take the helm. Instead she blocked the new blood from higher committee positions. The attacks on her insider trading stick for a reason. I wish the same ones didn’t bounce off republicans but they’re clearly scott free of any accountability from their voting base, unlike the left which is constantly infighting.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 小时前

          Nancy Pelosi actually doesn’t do any trading, the man she married while still in college owns an investment firm and in the USA married couples have joint assets.

          One of the biggest allegations of Insider Trading was when VISA credit company offered them stock options just before a big legislation regulating VISA went through, but Nancy actually voted against the company’s interests anyways.

          In many years, Paul’s portfolio operates at a loss and the two of them don’t even make the list of top traders in congress.

    • Gsus4@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      23 小时前

      Doesnt this boil down to the usual “the left falls in love, while the right falls in line”? hard to fall in love with your alliy’s ongoing war crimes and lefties are renowed for not falling in line even against their best interests. Makes it hard to win as an incumbent, though, how did Obama win reelection, he wouldn’t have been mistaken for a saint the second time round.

      PS: got it, it’s because Romney still couldn’t make the right fall in line hard enough comparing with the love for Obama.