• Freefall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Most Americans have your back too…it’s just our messed up voting and education systems that let the lunatic fringe gain all the power. For a representative democracy, it really doesn’t represent the people.

    • MochiGoesMeow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Hell yeah, im just waiting for a blue state to announce intention to secede and join the EU. But that might be messy.

      ;(

      A messy dream.

      • Freefall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        States cant secede without war. It is a kinda silly dream anyway. It is better to let the red states rot and have a display of how their ideals fail and how blue states flourish, then take our country back, then go through the insane process of digging out the roots and backdoors they are rushing to put in place as we speak

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      According the most recent elections, most Americans don’t.

      There has to be a point where Americans who don’t support chaos stop saying “this isn’t who we really are” and start admitting “huh, I guess we’re assholes now.”

      • Freefall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Elections tell you, semi-accurately, what THE VOTING POPULOUS WANTED OR WAS FOOLED INTO BACKING. So you got data on less than 40% of the population and half were against this.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          So, the American populace are fools. That doesn’t really help matters. This isn’t some minority thing, it’s half or nearly half of the population.

  • YamahaRevstar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 days ago

    You wanna meet up in the laneway and rip a couple clappers at the garage door while smokin’ darts, well count me in.

      • bob_lemon@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        And not even impossible. The EU council and commission can basically freely decide if a state counts as “European”.

        I think the biggest hurdle might be that Canada would immediately be the 5th most powerful member state because of their population.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          40 is three million more than Ukraine, both in between Spain and Poland. Having a couple more mid-sized countries would enable integration of Turkey which eeks out Germany in terms of population.

        • Treczoks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          The EU is talking to Turkey about membership (on and off…), and I would say that Canada is more European than Turkey.

          • TheBrideWoreCrimson@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Actual membership for Turkey hasn’t been a serious option for a long time. Turkey knows it, EU knows it. There simply is no other label than “candidate” that could better describe what TR means to the EU. They want to keep it as close as possible, and TR benefits from it, a lot. A symbiosis, if you will. As for the Switzerland model, the EU clearly stated, multiple times, that they don’t want to repeat the unholy mess of relations they created with CH and, in fact, would rather transform it to something in line with stock EU foreign policy.

        • philpo@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          As the EU mostly does not decide population based but with equal votes per country that wouldn’t be an issue.

          The larger issue is the fact that the European and US regulations clash in a lot of things so it would be harder for Canadian companies to export to the US then.

          But otherwise: We would absolutely welcome you.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      We didn’t know we had that option. But hell yeah… what do we have to do? Make Google and Apple put a “West Europe” label over Canada?

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      I don’t think Canada should fully be in the EU, but some kind of set of bilateral arrangements like Switzerland has would be a good start.

      Since Canada has lots of historical ties with the UK, it might work out well to have some kind of arrangement with the UK, Canada and the EU. That would let Britain start to undo some of the damage from Brexit, while also allowing Canada to reinforce those ties to the UK.

  • brewery@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    From the UK and personally, 100% yes but not sure I feel the rest of the population would agree. I mean, a lot of us turned our backs on the EU and there’s a lot of cross over with US right wing nutters.

    However, I would believe that when push comes to shove, we would be generally willing to defend Canada, Australia and NZ over anyone else, and then European countries at the next level. The reaction in support for Ukraine was pretty universal here and there are still lots of donations and support that is not shared with any African, Asian or Central/South American countries having similar problems.

    Basically, you’re white so yes you can count on us!

      • brewery@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        That’s a very good point and can’t believe I didn’t think of that! Surely the British army would have to protect “his majesty’s realm” or some bollocks like that.

        I just read that Canada hosts Britain’s largest overseas base, although it seems to be for training purposes.

      • brewery@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        If we rolled back a decade, Putin wasn’t around and something happened like idk, China invaded western Russia, I can imagine us helping Russia.

        I should change it to “your population is mostly white so yes you can count on us”. I say this as an English born non-white person who has seen the differences in public reactions to Ukraine and other conflicts (Syria, various African ones, Gaza etc). Can’t say for certain it’s because of this reason but certainly feels like it!

        • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’m sure for some (sad and backwards) people it is a racially motivated position - but for many others I think it has more to do with cultural and geographical proximity.

          But then our elected representatives go and fuck up the Middle East… I don’t know.

          As an aside, do you know my favourite rugby chant? I’ve heard it at Wales v England rugby games:

          “I’d rather wear a turban than a rose, I’d rather wear a turban than a rose, I’d rather wear a turban, I’d rather wear a turban, I’d rather wear a turban than a rose.”

          I have a Russian friend who lives in (south) Wales and when he first arrived (10-15 years ago) he couldn’t understand non-white people being Welsh. Years later he realised that a green person born in Newport is already more Welsh than he’ll ever be.

          The UK is a very contradictory bastard union that has - so far - somehow managed to stay in one piece.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Something something Emmanuel Todd and endogamous communal family structures, the tight internal clan bonds competing with and thus preventing the creation of a strong overarching identities vs. almost exclusively non-communal structures in Europe (and where there’s communalism it’s not as strong as in the Arab world, and definitely not endogamous), leading to strong overarching civil societies and identities. Very different assumptions about how society should be organised on a very fundamental, structural, level.

            In those terms Europe is culturally way closer to e.g. Japan (just as much stem family structures as e.g. Ireland and lots of Scandinavian and German regions, some in France) than we are to the Arab world. Arabs actually integrating here means, for them, to flip an internal switch, saying something like “oh now my clan is my region, and my profession a secondary one”, and that is hard to do because a) you don’t actually know most of those people, while you know at least about everyone in your original clan, and b) you’re in a foreign land, not understanding what binds people together even though they might not know each other directly, also c) your family clan is still expecting you to be part of it, and not just in the “come to your cousin’s marriage” way. Lots of non-prejudicial cultural friction that especially people from absurdly individualist societies like the US don’t understand because they don’t have an overarching society in the first place. Both sides think the other is weird AF.

  • Kaboom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    8 days ago

    They don’t even have their own backs. Look at their military spending. It’s pretty low.

  • IndiBrony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    8 days ago

    Northern Brit here: we have to have each other’s backs. The only way we’re getting off Mr Bones’ Wild Ride is together ❤️ we can do this.

    Resist. Rebel. Revolt. ✊

  • Majorllama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    63
    ·
    8 days ago

    Let’s see… The UK…who needed America to get involved to end WW2 and France who are literally a meme for surrendering these days (despite having the greatest military track record of any nation still standing).

    I’m sure they got your back. Lol.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      That’s … an interesting take on history. It seems filtered and has a weird PoV.

      Maybe brush up a bit, okay?

      • Majorllama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        Listen I would give Canada some nukes, but something tells me America is currently not inclined to give Canada anything lol.

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Bruh, we were literally talking about the UK and France, both are nuclear powers, they have plenty of warheads. Did you not know that? 🤦‍♂️

          You don’t need a lot, just like 20 warheads will kneecap the entire US.

          They don’t even have to use it, just threaten to use it.

          • Majorllama@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            8 days ago

            Yes thank you captain obvious. I know how mutually assured destruction works.

            I am very aware that both the UK and France have nukes. The way he worded his comment I thought he was talking about America giving Canada nukes, but the UK and/or France make more sense given the hypothetical posed by the original post. I was responding to the comment while I was on the phone. Divided attention n all that.

            Dont talk down to people like that. Its condescending and you have no idea how intelligent anyone actually is based off one comment. You know what they say about making assumptions.

            Something something we all get some ass.

            • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              You need to start understanding that the US is not the defender of democracy anymore. When people talk of protecting democracy, no one is thinking of getting from the US because you’re the ones we’re trying to defend against. With each passing day your country is becoming the enemy of democracy.

              I know this may be difficult to accept, but the US may become the great villains of the 21st century just as the Nazis were the villains of the 20th. We all hope that that won’t happen, but we see the signs and we have to be prepared to defend democracy from US aggression.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        donate some nukes to Canada

        Nothing to see here, though. That, um, was a tall subterranean grain elevator. Thanks for thinking of us. Yeah, great weather we’re having.

      • Majorllama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        Not when they surrendered dingus. The meme/joke that Frances official flag is a white flag has been going around since I was a kid in the 90s and both my little brothers also know that meme.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 days ago

      I don’t think France would be deterred by (what generally seems to be) an American meme

    • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      France is only a meme if you know nothing about history, and assuming you’re American (as if that isn’t extremely obvious) that sounds about right

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      What an incredibly deep ignorance about the modern world.

      If you’re curious about how countries militaries actually stack up these days I’d suggest looking into the results of some of the recent NATO joint exercises. The French military is actually quite formidable with a lot of recent heavy intervention in old colonies and anti terrorism strike force actions lately… now, nothing can really compare to the insane US military budget but France is pretty fucking serious.

      The UK is a joke, though.

      The real sleeping bears are the Baltics though. Those fucks are scared shitless of Russia and have heavily invested in widespread training in an effort to present Russia with an occupational nightmare due to partisan resistance if they ever invade.

      As a contrast while China has a shit load of stuff there was a massive amount of military supply corruption leading to a really high practical failure rate. They’ve got infantry for days of course, and their navy is quite serious… but there’s a strong suspicion that China’s airforce is much weaker than numbers would suggest.