Summary

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Kamala Harris’ 2024 running mate, has suggested he may run for president in 2028.

Reflecting on the Democrats’ loss to Donald Trump and JD Vance, he admitted: “A large number of people did not believe we were fighting for them in the last election – and that’s the big disconnect.”

Walz said his life experience, rather than ambition, would guide his decision.

Though his VP campaign was marred by gaffes, he remains open to running if he feels prepared.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    We could do (and have done) a lot worse. My only concern is whether or not he has the backbone to refuse to be steered to the right, the way Kamala was after the convention. His Midwestern politeness definitely didn’t serve him well in the debate.

      • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        The DNC consultancy class are almost certainly to blame for every failure they’ve had since 2016. Or sooner, I’m just stopping there out of convenience.

        I might call that steering. I don’t think Harris really believes in anything.

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        I hope you’re right, at least to a point. Carter was following up the absolute disaster that was the Nixon administration by removing significant amounts of power from the executive, codifying norms that Nixon had flouted, and showing a conciliatory, less-combative presence on the world stage within a fairly flammable geopolitical context. All of that is exactly, to the letter, what we need from the 48th president.

        Now, sure, Carter lost to Reagan. But I get the feeling that Walz wouldn’t suffer such a fool.

  • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I guess I’m the only one against this idea. I’m not keen on candidates that have already lost running again. Get someone else up there to try.

  • Kcap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m feeling pretty certain the dems will run Buttigieg. Feels like they’ve been prepping him for a while.

  • JohnnyFlapHoleSeed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Walz is a completely valid candidate. The only thing that held up Harris was that she was a black woman. I’m confident that any reasonable white man would have beat Trump, and that’s unfortunate, but it’s the reality of the American electorate

  • morriscox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    As long as the Democratic Party considers whites to be automatically racist and sexist then do they actually represent the population?

  • Dogsoftulkas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    If I were him I’d install metal bars in my windows, specially if he lives in a high up condo. No reason, everything’s fine.

  • Lasherz@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m worried that despite having very good views himself that he is going to be tainted by the past. Not without reason too, because the consultants made him stand down with the “weird” insult and progressive messaging. Like most of these people, if it’s not their authentic campaign, then whose is it? He’s demonstrated, like most people who reach a moment in their career to seriously consider this, that he’s too malleable for populist politics. It’s possible that he completely sheds that team and runs his own, but who here really thinks that’s going to happen? I’d believe it if we had AOC for VP. The pressure to succumb to inferior messaging is higher than it’ll ever be during a presidential campaign, I don’t really trust anyone to stay firm except AOC, Talib, and Bernie because they have demonstrated resistance in this sort of high pressure consultant environment.

  • arotrios@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Unless he steps up and starts fighting alongside the progressives trying to do something (like joining Bernie’s current Midwest tour), I don’t see him as being a viable candidate for 2028.

    I like Walz. A lot. But he’s got to show more leadership on the national stage right now, ala Newsom, Whitmer, Pritzker and (in a pleasant surprise) Mills. I think he was thrust onto the national stage before he was ready by the DNC looking to swing the Midwest with a non-threatening centrist candidate, and his silence after the election (and the lack of a real response from the Harris campaign) has left it to other governors to take up the mantle of national leadership.

    Would I vote for him if he were on the ticket? Yes. Would I vote for him over Newsom, Whitmer or Pritzker - probably not unless he steps up and takes the battle to Trump NOW.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I really do think Tim Walz has a real chance. A very likeable guy.

    Doesn’t hurt that he’s white and male, too.

  • Kalysta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    Tim Walz unleashed would have won this.

    He was hamstrug by Harris. He’s likely the dem’s best choice for 2028.

    So of course they’ll run Newsome or Shapiro or Hillary Clinton again because they’re a bunch of idiots.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Idk who needs to hear this, but Tim Walz is pretty moderate and centrist. You’re not going to unite the splintered left with Tim Walz.

    The biggest barrier Democrats have is that left leaning voters are not going out and voting for them.