Linked National Post on purpose. Given their bias I believe they’d present the worst case scenario.

E: Apparently the article is from 2016 so the cost is likely higher today.

  • Yoga@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 day ago

    https://www.saab.com/markets/canada/gripen-for-canada/built-for-canada-by-canada

    From another page:

    “In addition, Canada will have full and exclusive control over Gripen’s secure data – a unique advantage of our offer. The Gripen Centre in Montreal will host all work on the fighter’s mission system and Canadians will carry out this work. With the mission system, communications and technical data all hosted in Canada, Gripen exceeds all industrial, security and controlled goods requirements. With Gripen the Royal Canadian Air Force will have maximum control over sensitive data handling.”

    It’s a no brainer, in a world of digital warfare, needing to rely on a foreign home base is a tremendous liability.

  • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Ford blew twice that to put beer in gas stations. Clearly we have the money to blow 🤡

  • Nils@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    These are numbers from 2016. Is there any place where we can read these contracts? Maybe with the current situation, conditions are changing. Hopefully, people put a clause in case of animosity between countries.

  • Aconite@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 day ago

    Fuck it. They’re an intelligence hazard and that’s cheap in government terms.

      • AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago
        1. But it continues the notion that we should rely on them for information, when they have most certainly poisoned Canadian culture and politics.
        2. Also, by sending users to an American site, it increases their revenues, when this money could have gone to a Canadian media site.
        3. And if you aren’t already aware, Canadian owned media is deliberately neglected because it’s contrary to a particular elite group in this country… And yeah, we should support and grow Canadian owned media regardless of political party.

        But if you still insist on supporting American media…

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    America is currently at war with us, declared abruptly and out of nowhere. They just decided one day “we want to annex Canada!”

    Even if Donald’s presidency is short-lived and a new slightly saner and less stupid administration takes control, I don’t think it’s a good idea to be trusting the Americans any more.

    We need to disentangle ourselves from any military dependence on such ridiculously unreliable “allies.” I’m all for this.

    • Reannlegge@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Even if Donald’s presidency is short-lived and a new slightly saner and less stupid administration takes control

      I know the hamburglar has got his sights on Trump but if he takes his shot during the next 4 years the US gets JD Vance. Vance will be a lot worse than Trump, I do not know how Musk or Teil will handle Vance.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Do you mean Thiel?

        Vance may be much smarter than Trump (low bar) and have actual plans for evil, vs. doing awful things on a whim. But, JD Vance doesn’t have Trump’s cult of personality. Whoever comes after Trump will return to the same normal relationship that a president has with their party. With the modern GOP that means intense squabbling and infighting. I doubt a president Vance could get much if his evil plan passed, even if the GOP did still control all the branches of government.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I think everyone is thinking the same way. I think the probability of the US invading is low, but there is a probability.

      Even if the US never uses their military against us, there’s a very real chance they withhold parts for military equipment as leverage in a negotiation. They are already withholding military aid from Ukraine as leverage after all. That alone makes it imperative we end Canada’s dependency on the US defense industry.

    • pretzelz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      22 hours ago

      You would imagine there would be a clause in the contract for exactly this scenario. If there’s not, it’s going to be a common one in contacts going forward…

    • PenguinMage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      As an American I sadly agree. This is an overreach that shouldn’t be ignored. And if it is OK now it’s obviously not off the table sometime down the road… this isnt something g you just shove under the carpet.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Notwithstanding clause. Don’t pay a fucking dime.

    Besides war declared by US, that makes US permissions on every flight a deal breaker, the plane is a POS, and we should be refunded for returning every existing plane we may already have. Cancelling deal for cause, with zero penalty, despite any contract is the right move.

  • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve been advocating joining GCAP, an effort by Japan, UK and Italy to make a 6th gen fighter. It isn’t scheduled to deliver the final design until 2035 though, so we would still need a stopgap.

    Still, it would send a pretty strong signal and also allow as a path to reinvigorate our domestic aerospace defence industry.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      This looks like a good idea. We do have people in Lunenberg, NS that have experience with working with stealth materials which could be a significant contribution to that project.

      Could we call it the Arrow? Though I’d also be cool with it being called Spitfire.

      • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I don’t know, but I wouldn’t be surprised if the final platform had room for national partner tweaks. Probably could call ours the Arrow 2: Strange Brew or something.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      and also allow as a path to reinvigorate our domestic aerospace defence industry.

      Avro Arrow centenary edition in 2059.

  • CircaV@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    23 hours ago

    We need to pull out of this deal, the last thing Canada needs is to buy weapons from the country that has designs to annex us. And that sells weapons with kill switches.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It doesn’t have a kill switch. It’s a computer program that helps the radar and stuff. Right now everyone’s program goes to the US for QA before they fly with it. It’s purely by agreement, countries are absolutely physically capable of doing this on their own.

      • CircaV@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Exactly. Absolutely it has to be cancelled based on the fact that the imminent danger to Canada is from the US. No way we should be buying their weapons, listening to their media etc.

      • Pixel@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The daily unlock code thing is a myth. The grain of truth is that the F-35 relies heavily on mission data files (MDFs), which are region-specific software packages that enable the jet to recognize threats, navigate, and employ weapons, and we depend on the US being willing to supply those updates voluntarily for our fighter jets to be useful.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        That feels like an internet rumour. How would that even work? Like if someone took out LM’s servers all F-35s in the world would no longer function? If an enemy jammed the signal they wouldn’t work?

        There’s no need to invent problems anyway. The US could potentially cut off Canada from parts needed to maintain the planes and that’s reason enough to cancel it.

    • CircaV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Exactly. Canada should just choose to ignore it. Just like the US is ignoring international deals they’ve signed with other countries. Thing is: Canada has honour and our actual signature means something when we sign agreements. I don’t think Canada will sink as low as the US.

    • Perhapsjustsniffit@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      When the creditor calls tell them Canada doesn’t live here anymore and hang up like your room mate used to do for you in college.

  • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s less than the total incurred costs of Ford’s decision to break the contract with The Beer Store a year earlier than scheduled.