• Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        2 days ago

        At large organizations you’re generally not allowed to download much of anything without it passing through IT security and management first. If it’s a no, it will probably stay a no.

        • datavoid@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Just remember,it’s easier to ask for forgiveness than permission!

          • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Just to be clear, I mean it’s literally managed at the Group Policy level (in Windows server environments at least) and no amount of asking will suddenly give your user account permissions to be able to save files of any kind.

            You generally literally cannot download it without going through IT to get them to approve of and give your account access first.

            • datavoid@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Ya I forgot I have escalated device privileges and an admin account, which I definitely would have used for installing anything. Although I believe I can also skirt the rules using winget on a user account. That will probably get you in trouble however!

        • Flagstaff@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I work for a non-profit and they are way more lenient about what we would like to install as long as the job gets done.

          • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            Then you have bad opsec and security holes.

            This matters more for some industries than others. But this attitude lets a malicious employee install basically whatever they want in service of “the job” and you won’t even know you’re being breached until after it’s all over.

            • Flagstaff@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Well, we still have to get approval. But it just seems like they don’t mind as much. For example, I don’t know how many companies out there would be fine with installations of AutoHotkey and LibreOffice.

      • takeda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        64
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah. What company wouldn’t allow it?

        When I was working for an ad exchange, everyone had adblock installed in their browsers, I found that quite ironic.

        • micka190@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah. What company wouldn’t allow it?

          My IT department uninstalled it from my work laptop, and told me not to reinstall it because - and I quote: “The only browser IT officially supports is Google Chrome.”

          What makes this doubly stupid is that I’m a web developer. I literally can’t test my stuff on another browser…

        • shyguyblue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          I used to develop ads (non intrusive things for home depot or go RVing) and i used ad blockers. When testing, i would just run private browsing with plugins disabled…

        • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          59
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I would argue it’s a security issue not to have any ad blocking. Many scams online start with popups or fake ads.

          So if you get the opportunity to talk to IT that’s what I would mention.

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        2 days ago

        Officially only Edge is supported, but Chrome is tolerated. It’s a full MS environment.

    • hunt4peas@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Edge extension store still has it I think. Use it until Edge removes it as well. Then tell the IT to use Firefox highlighting the importance of adblocking.

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I don’t like my chances of swaying IT. The organisation is too big and I’ll get told I should be using Edge which is the only officially supported browser.

    • dirthawker0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      If you had uBlock origin already, you may have gotten a message through Chrome that it was no longer supported, so it’s been disabled, and gives you the option to remove it. I noticed you don’t have to remove it, and it can be re-enabled. However, I need someone smarter with adblockers than I to say if this is actually helpful and not hazardous.

      • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        People are saying manifest v2 (the old API that ublock uses) will be gone soon, which I think should effectively make ublock unusable whatever you do unless you stop updating chrome maybe (which could open you up to a ton of security issues) ? Not sure, don’t care since I’ve ditched chrome long ago