• Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Most AI models out there are pretty brain dead as far as understanding goes, these types of things show the problems because it’s abundantly clear it’s getting it wrong. Makes you wonder how much it’s getting wrong even when it isn’t obvious.

  • Smorty [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    21 hours ago

    promptng sur is a funi <3

    i… i lik that part about it… i dun lik imag modls bt txt modls feel fun to prmt with —

    “prompt engerieer” 🤮

  • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 hours ago

    ChatGPT: “don’t generate a dog, don’t generate a dog, don’t generate a dog”

    Generates a dog.

  • gamer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Why wouldn’t you want a dog in your static? Why are you a horrible person?

  • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I asked mistral to “generate an image with no dog” and it did

    The fact that it chose something else to generate instead makes me wonder if this is some sort of free will?

    • Hoimo@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I think all the big image generators support negative prompts by now, so if it interpreted “no dog” as a negative for “dog”, then it will check its outputs for things resembling dogs and discard those. No free will, just a much more useful system than whatever OP is using.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Mistral likely does “prompt enhancement,” aka feeding your prompt to an LLM first and asking it to expand it with more words.

      So internally, a Mistral text LLM is probably writing out “sure! Here’s a long prompt with no dog: …” and then that part is fed to the image generator.

      Other “LLMs” are truly multimodal and generate image output, hence they still get the word “dog” in the input.

    • festnt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      12 hours ago

      it just did what you wanted, since you asked for an image. free will would be if you asked it not to generate an image but it still did, if it just generated an image without you prompting it to, or if you asked for an image and it just didn’t respond

  • sarcophagus @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The only thing I have in common with this piece of shit software is we both can’t stop thinking about silly dogs

    • festnt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      12 hours ago

      “want me to try again with even more randomized noise?” literally makes no sense if it had generated what you asked (which the chatbot thinks it did)

      • joshchandra@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Remember, “AI” (autocomplete idiocy) doesn’t know what sense is; it just continues words and displays what may seem to address at least some of the topic with no innate understanding of accuracy or truth.

        Never forget that ChatGPT 2.0 can literally be run in a giant Excel spreadsheet with no other program needed. It’s not “smart” and is ultimately millions of formulae at work.

    • Gloomy@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Wow. I ABSOLUTLY saw an image of a dog in the middle. Our brain sure is fascinating sometimes.

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    AI: Hmm, yeah, they said “dog” and “without”. I got the dog so lemme draw a without real quick…

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Fellow human, you seem to be beeping like a robot. Might you need to consider visiting the human repair shop for some bench time?

  • Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I used to use Google assistant to spell words I couldn’t remember the spelling of in my English classes (without looking at my phone) so the students could also hear the spelling out loud in a voice other than mine.

    Me: “Hey Google, how do you spell millennium?” GA: “Millennium is spelled M-I-L-L-E-N-N-I-U-M.”

    Now, I ask Gemini: “Hey Google, how do you spell millennium.” Gemini: “Millennium”.

    Utterly useless.