• boughtmysoul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    Non-American here. Shouldn’t private citizens be stripped of this as soon as they leave their position in government? What is the normal amount of time that people like these would retain clearance?

    • xyzzy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Former presidents, vice presidents, secretaries of state, etc. receive briefings because until recently they served as a kind of private advisory board to presidents and their successors. It was also, in a worst-case scenario, about continuity of government: if a nuke drops on DC, Obama could step in temporarily to help lead a transitional government.

      Of course, Trump and his cabinet don’t need advisors because they’re all geniuses who know everything.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 days ago

      A security clearance does not grant you access to information, it’s a minimum prerequisite before someone else decides you have an active need to know something and then shares the information.

  • halfempty@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ironic, because he just let Elon Musk attend a top secret Pentagon meeting about War Plans with China. But really, this is theater, typical petty Trump and has no real impact on anything.

  • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    I know this violates “norms” but honestly it seems like small potatoes. Like, maybe being a former holder of public office shouldn’t grant you access to secure information. Why does GW Bush, or Bill Clinton, or Biden, or Obama, or Harris need a security clearance as private citizens?

    • BoofStroke@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because they can act in an advisory role based on their own experience in office. Not that the toddler in chief would ever need any of it to begin with.

    • Nursery2787@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      In a functional world, previous office holders could do their limited duty and give up to date advice to the decision maker.

      Presuming this is still a functional world, Trump doesn’t see a scenario where he would trust their advice. So he’s following your point of reducing the need to know list.

      • 4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Now, facing reality, he doesn’t want them calling out the bullshit he’s pulling that they might only find out about in these reports.

        Plus his base goes “hell yeah brother, more DEI gone!” Or whatever it is they say

  • theneverfox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 days ago

    Wait, did he figure out how security clearances work finally or did he just declare it on truth social?