• TeoTwawki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I think the person saying it wants to avoid family or acquaintances giving them shit for not sharing their political views.

    Most of my family is very conservative stereotype vile people. I’ve heard that exact phrase from the few left leaning relatives as they try to wigle out of unconfortable conversations. I myself am the black sheep that just tells the repugnicans that their views disgust me.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    My first thought is to wonder what they mean, as opposed to deciding it must be the worst thing I can think of.

  • Jarix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I won’t waste my life savings on hookers and blow but you should absolutely have the freedom to do so without judgment

  • OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 days ago

    I prefer to use the term fiscally responsible.

    It’s fiscally irresponsible to cut taxes for the billionaires and corporations when we have record deficits.

    It’s fiscally irresponsible to cut the IRS budget when that results in less revenue.

    Republican voters have been brainwashed into thinking that Republicans are somehow more responsible with the economy and budget, when history shows that Republicans drive up the deficit with irresponsible tax cuts.

    • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      It’s irresponsible to cut taxes and not cut spending.

      Edit: spending more than yu take in creates debt and that is not responsible

      • Chip_Rat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Not related. It’s not a zero sum game. Spending on certain things can save money and allow for tax cuts, tax cuts can create business growth or income in other ways and allow more spending. Defering tax cuts to a certain time or spending to a certain time can lead to better results, ect ect ect.

        Anyone who thinks it’s linked and must be Tax up=Spending up or Tax down=Spending down should probably not even be in charge of their own homes finances. Even children are taught how to save their allowance over time and then spend it, and I had occasion as a child to “borrow” my allowance to purchase a toy that was on sale.

        • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          Nothing about my statement is even slightly controversial from a finance or economic standpoint. If you know you are taking in less money from a tax cut then you should not spend more as you will increase your debt.

  • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    I used to think this, because I was against government waste. But I also supported welfare programs, so I was just using the wrong terms for my ideas.

  • Singletona082@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    ‘You’re lying to either me, yourself, or both. You’re a full on conservative and don’t want to admit it.’’

  • OmegaLemmy@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    My friend who managed to be as right as it could even be in a political compass test which I thought was impossible, the man was a hyper capitalist