I’d say one point thirty-two. As others noted, much depends on geography.
Personally, I say the “actual” number up to 3 or 4 decimal places, with a lot of the reason depending on the specific context. If I had to asses, I’d say I say the “whole” number in over 50% of cases for 3 digits, and in about 10% for 4 digits. Anything over 4 decimal places and I fall back to individual digits.
One point three two, or one three two if it’s obvious from context where the decimal point is. That’s how you’re meant to pronounce digits after the decimal point in general.
Jeden przecinek trzydziesci dwa
“about a meg” because it’s almost unthinkable anyone cares about 3 tenths of a meg much less 2 hundredths.
“about a meg” because it’s almost unthinkable anyone cares about 3 tenths of a meg much less 2 hundredths.
Tell me you never used floppy discs as a storage medium without telling me.
I’d round up to one and a half. Also remove “bytes” and “bites”. 1.32 MB is “one and a half megs” or even “a meg and a half”
The first one is correct as others have said, but the second one is not ambiguous enough to confuse anyone nor weird enough for anyone to bat an eye at, you’re fine with either.
I’d say the second one is more correct, it sounds so weird pronouncing the digits singularly
I’d say the second one is more correct
In this case, it’s not about what sounds good or personal opinion, there is a standard name for that number for a reason. If I go around calling 100 “one oh oh” or “tenty ten”, it’s clear what number I mean but I can’t honestly call it more correct, because there’s a standard English name for it.
To demonstrate a part of why it’s clearer that way, put these numbers in ascending numerical order: (e.g. 1, 2, 3, … )
- one point three
- one point twenty-nine
- one point thirty
- one point thirty-one
- one point three-thousand-and-fifty-two
Hopefully this clarifies that we’re not actually dealing with a “thirty-two” when we’re talking about 1.32 (edit: that said, when we’re talking about version numbers, e.g. Linux kernel 4.20, which is greater than Linux kernel 4.9, then we’d say “four point twenty”)
About one floppy disk, with a little free space to spare.
Very little, around 60k.
A 1.44 “MB” floppy is 1440k, or about 1.406 real MB, and of that the space used by the FAT file system reduces it to around 1.38 free space.
For some reason I couldn’t find the exact number and don’t have any handy to check it myself.Modified versions of various blank floppies ------------------------------------------- These modifications reduce the number of FAT tables from 2 to 1 and also reduce the number of root entries down to 16 files, which frees up some extra storage space. The 1.72MB format can ONLY be used on Win9X systems on real hardware, as not even WinNT can access tracks 81 or 82 on floppy disks. Disk image programs like WinImage can still access files within 1.72MB floppy images. 1.44MB Standard: 80 Tracks 18 Sectors/Track 2880 Sectors Total 1474560 Bytes Total ------------------------------------------- Sectors Per Cluster: 1 Number of FATs: 2 Max Root Entries: 224 Sectors Per FAT: 9 1457664 Bytes Data 1.44MB Maxed: ------------------------------------------- Sectors Per Cluster: 4 Number of FATs: 1 Max Root Entries: 64 Sectors Per FAT: 3 1470464 Bytes Data Differences: ------------------------------------------- 12800 Bytes More, 160 Less Root Entries 1.68MB Standard: 80 Tracks 21 Sectors/Track 3360 Sectors Total 1720320 Bytes Total ------------------------------------------- Sectors Per Cluster: 1 Number of FATs: 2 Max Root Entries: 224 Sectors Per FAT: 10 1702400 Bytes Data 1.68MB Maxed: ------------------------------------------- Sectors Per Cluster: 4 Number of FATs: 1 Max Root Entries: 64 Sectors Per FAT: 3 1716224 Bytes Data Differences: ------------------------------------------- 13824 Bytes More, 160 Less Root Entries DMF 1024 Standard: 80 Tracks 21 Sectors/Track 3360 Sectors Total 1720320 Bytes Total ------------------------------------------- Sectors Per Cluster: 2 Number of FATs: 2 Max Root Entries: 16 Sectors Per FAT: 5 1714176 Bytes Data DMF 1024 Maxed: ------------------------------------------- Sectors Per Cluster: 4 Number of FATs: 1 Max Root Entries: 64 Sectors Per FAT: 3 1716224 Bytes Data 2048 Bytes More, 48 More Root Entries DMF 2048 Standard: 80 Tracks 21 Sectors/Track 3360 Sectors Total 1720320 Bytes Total ------------------------------------------- Sectors Per Cluster: 4 Number of FATs: 2 Max Root Entries: 16 Sectors Per FAT: 3 1716224 Bytes Data DMF 2048 Maxed: ------------------------------------------- Sectors Per Cluster: 4 Number of FATs: 1 Max Root Entries: 64 Sectors Per FAT: 3 1716224 Bytes Data Differences: ------------------------------------------- 0 Bytes More, 48 More Root Entries 1.72MB Standard: 82 Tracks 21 Sectors/Track 3444 Sectors Total 1763328 Bytes Total ------------------------------------------- Sectors Per Cluster: 1 Number of FATs: 2 Max Root Entries: 224 Sectors Per FAT: 10 1745408 Bytes Data 1.72MB Maxed: ------------------------------------------- Sectors Per Cluster: 4 Number of FATs: 1 Max Root Entries: 64 Sectors Per FAT: 3 1759232 Bytes Data Differences: ------------------------------------------- 13824 Bytes More, 160 Less Root EntriesIf you’re interested in the blank disk images themselves, let me know.
Also, 1474560 / 1024 = 1440
If anyone could keep up with binary numbers back in the day, floppy disks were literally measured in binary megabytes.
The floppy disk format is based on the FAT12 file system.
https://www.cs.drexel.edu/~johnsojr/2012-13/fall/cs370/resources/UnderstandingFAT12.pdf
And with enough creative tweaks to that file system, you can get DMF 1.68MB format, and if you think a bit outside the box and erase the redundant secondary FAT table and settle on a max of only 16 files on the disk, you can squeeze a few more kilobytes out of that even.
I actually made a number of custom modded blank disk images with more storage space, I might dig out the full specs of all the variants later.
One point thirty two
Ten-million-five-hundred-and-sixty-thousand bits.
One and thirty-two hundrethsFirst question, and it’s important: Are you Doc Brown?
Its pronounced ‘About four thirds megabytes.’
Usually the first unless you’re on radio then it’s preferred to read out numbers as each digit. “One decimal three two”
The first one
Only time I can think of where the 32 of 1.32 could be said as thirty-two would be as a software version number
One point four four
I have heard people drop the “point” and say “One Fourty-four”.
criminal!
“One fourty-four Em Bee floppy”
That’s exactly how they said it!
Heresy!
that’s how i’d say it in hungarian, except i’d drop the MB too. “egy negyvennégyes flopi”
Tree fiddy!
