Republicans are drunk with power. What a stupid fucking idea. There’s no chance of banning porn. Then they wouldn’t be able to jerk to Trans women and feel shame after.

Trans women are hot, in case that reads as though the shame is correct. It’s not.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    130
    ·
    26 days ago

    Check this guy’s computer first. Guarantee there’s some fucked up shit on there. It’s always projection.

    • Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      Mike Lee is a full-blown Mormon, which heavily frowns upon porn in any form (including literal prophetic teachings calling women “walking pornography”), so he absolutely does have porn on his devices.

      Source: grew up Mormon, was taught this by leadership

      • madjo@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        26 days ago

        And their definition of “porn” is so broad, it’s bordering on ridiculous.

        • Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          25 days ago

          Dude… Their doctrine is all over the place haha. Like, everyone knew that the garments were all about “modestly”, and yet with the recent release of tank-top style women’s garment tops, they’re all claiming that “it was never about modesty teehee”. Fucking gaslighting bullshit. Same with rated R movies. Some leader somewhere stated that members shouldn’t watch rated R movies, and somehow everyone took it as literal gospel, despite it not being written anywhere.

          I’m so fucking glad I’m out of that goddamn cult.

  • AlexLost@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    26 days ago

    What can be described as porn is subjective to individuals. It should not be regulated by a government body outside of criminal activity surrounding it’s production and distribution.

    • ToolMenace@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      26 days ago

      Not quite. Pornography is pretty well defined, which is how the production and distribution of it can be legislated like it is.

      The problem with bills/laws like this is that they intentionally leave what is banned entirely up to the government of the day by using vague language like “obscene content”. It’s not specifically banning pornography, but a government could use it to ban pornography, books, music, clothes, etc.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    To those weebs, who voted Trump, because “the transes” were mean to you for the loli hentai: this is on you!

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    26 days ago

    Are there really not enough house or senate votes, or court decisions, that we resort to writing articles about every bill introduced?

  • Saryn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    26 days ago

    Brought to you by a president who f****d a pornstar and paid her off by falsifying business records.

    Clown world for a clown species.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    26 days ago

    The American porn industry is as big as Hollywood. This is a big billions of dollars market. And the US porn industry provides 90% of international porn. So Trump and his GOP wants to kill the one last American industry where the US is world market leader by far.

    And I can easily see this industry moving to countries where actors are cheaper and less protected from abuse, diseases, and whatever else happening in this industry.

    While this will make some religious fundamentalists in the US feel superior and give them a sense of a perceived moral high ground, it will actually hurt the most vulnerable people in the chain the most. It will not reduce the amount of porn made, it will just make it much, much worse for those involved.