• TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 month ago

    Anon, it took one hundred years of trial and errors in design and mechanical failures, resulting in hundreds of deaths, to perfect the dark arts of aviation.

  • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think large planes “look” like they can’t work because their “relative speed” is really low — that is, their speed relative to their length. We’re used to seeing birds cover tens of lengths per second, whereas a large airliner covers ~1ish per second at takeoff.

    Or not, but this always seemed like a plausible explanation as to why planes look impossible. (Though given that hovering birds don’t look funny, maybe this is a silly observation…).

    • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s a really thoughtful take, I’m glad you shared. I think it has merit. I think proximity is a factor too. The public rarely gets up close to a jet, but I can attest from personal experience they seem much faster when you’re closer during takeoff and landing.

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      Though given that hovering birds don’t look funny, maybe this is a silly observation…

      Birds flying against the wind and staying in the same spot as a result do look kinda weird though. Especially if you are not aware/don’t notice there is strong winds

  • Match!!@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    at takeoff i like to imagine that the plane is going into a massive underground subway network with really nice screens along the sides

    • Leon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      I would be worried if the aeroplane goes down rather than up during takeoff.

    • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      30 days ago

      Aye, good sir, I do most heartily concur; for 'tis a truth well settled that the tongue of man is fixed, unyielding, and shall ne’er be altered.

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The funniest thing is that the aerospace engineers who made this possible are just as much hopeless dysfunctional wrecks as the rest of us.

  • Fleur_@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    1 month ago

    Be human.

    Have billions of tons of atmosphere directly above you

    Don’t explode

    Make it make sense

  • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 month ago

    Next time you see a plane imaging two hooks in the middle of the wings, a crane lifting up the plane with these two hooks and shaking it.

    This give you a good approximation of what the forces in the plane are, and once you picture that you might think that there is no way the plane can hold up in this situation. Yet it does.

  • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    168
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    This perfectly encapsulates how anti vaxxers and others think. “Ive thought it through and it cantnbebright”. Its incredible how we can have access to vast amounts of information and yet live in an age of gleeful ignorance.

  • Thorry84@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well I must admit, when the plane is resting on the ground, the wings droop down a lot. Then when airborne it’s the other way around, the wings curve upwards as the fuselage hangs from them. In my mind nothing that big made of metal should be able to flex that much.

    But since I’m not a conspiracy theorist, I have learned about material science, airplane design and engineering. And I have found out that it does indeed flex that much. It also isn’t that thick, since it’s only a skeleton wrapped with a very thin layer of metal. In fact if it didn’t flex as much, it would be weaker and not stronger.

    So the thing I really learnt is never to trust intuition when it comes to things like this.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    My faith in humanity is so low that I 100% believe there are planes are not real truthers that’s out there.

    • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Well, I mean, those flat earth idiots clearly have never flown, so I wouldn’t be surprised if their digging down attitude would include planes. They already think the moon landing is fake, don’t they?

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        Actually that’s something I don’t understand, they think the moon is a sphere about 100 miles across about 1000 miles above the flat Earth. Why couldn’t humans have flown that short distance?

        • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          it depends on your flavor of flat-earther. for the religious types, the firmament is supposed to be in the way. for secular flat-earthers, I think they just like being contrary?

        • Geobloke@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          Well, I could’ve said male seahorses if that makes you feel better? Are they still submarines if you put them in an aquarium on a plane, but the plane crashes into the ocean?