In this post-truth media landscape, what news sources/publications do you use & trust the most, and why?

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Reuters and AP have both been extremely biased towards the perpetrators of the Gaza genocide.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Reuters lied about Maccabi supporters attacking Dutch people instead of the other way around and manufactured fake outrage about pogroms.

      Reuters also said they confirmed oct7 rape footage evidence which turned out to be a lie because it does not exist.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    BBC

    The ABC

    Guardian

    Democracy Now

    CBC

    NPR

    Basically anyone who is getting removeded at for not towing the line

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you still trust those after their coverage of the Gaza genocide has been so extremely biased towards the perpetrator, I would encourage you to rethink.

    • Philosaraptor7@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Democracy now!!! Yas.

      Good collection. I like just kinda getting a grasp on what the biase is and holding it loosely.

      I like cbc its public etc. Pretty balanced. Yet we also know it is neo-liberal and likely to indulge a bit far on some gender politics etc. I agree, having several outlets is important.

  • TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    As others have said no one source should have blanket trust.

    Understanding the bias the source may have by looking up who owns/funds it and understanding how that might skew what you’re reading is important.

    For news based on studies I usually will try to directly to the study which should list the methodology which will help show how well done it was.

    If I have time later I’ll put together a list of ones I use and what I’ve seen as their biases.

  • Quilotoa@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    BBC and CBC. They’re not unbiased, but I haven’t found any better.

  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Dropsitenews

    DemocracyNow!

    Mintpressnews

    Theintercept

    KenKlippenstein

    Jacobin

    Why? Because they have not spread pro Israel propaganda without doing a minute amount fact checking. Or worse, straight up lying for Israel.

    There are a few, such as TheGuardian, which have spread massive Israeli propaganda for a year. They have recently turned around tried to put the mask back on. But they have already shown their true face.

      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I feel like their bias is to simply not cover things they do not want to show.

        But the reason I find them more credible is because they are able to provide sources and not quote their own random anonymous journalists. If I can check the sources I can verify claims.

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    BBC, AP, The Guardian, NYT, NBC, CBC, The Conversation, The Atlantic, Nature.

  • wuphysics87@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fox News says The Gulf of Mexico is now The Gulf of America. I trust that they said it. Same as any other organization. They said X. That’s about it. The real selfish, honest truth, unless if effects me personally or will cause me to act, I really don’t care.