• Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    I hate that 2/3 of my fellow citizens support this, either directly or or tacitly by choosing not to vote.

    I really hope the protest/non voters are happy with the outcome they chose. I can’t wait to hear them tell me that Harris would have done this too! Anything to justify intentionally causing the suffering of more people…

    • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      12 days ago

      Bombing the shit out of the Middle East is the only bipartisanism the US has ever reached, therefore yes, a Democrat would have had to bomb something because that’s what US presidents do. Anyway, keep on blaming voters instead of holding the party accountable for its mistakes.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        12 days ago

        “Don’t blame the voters who elected the president” is the sort of argument I’d expect from someone intentionally ignoring that he bombed nuclear sites.

        BoTh SiDeS arguments are stupid and people who make them should be ignored. Like I said, anything to justify your bad choice.

        • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          I didn’t make a choice. I don’t live in the US. But my country is strewn with US military bases and it wasn’t Trump who put them there.

          Trump is simply more ignorant about how a US president should bomb the shit out of Middle Eastern countries, but don’t act like he invented anything.

          And yes, on some things “both sides suck” because the US have been terrorizing other countries for decades.

          They bring desolation and have the gall of calling it peace.

        • Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          12 days ago

          Both sides arguments are actually pretty enlightened. You can have criticisms of both candidates and vote for harm reduction. If anything the inability to criticize both sides for where they are the same is the same type of belligerent as MAGA. Harris running on building a fucking wall was a fucking disgrace.

          But fuck not blaming voters for their stupid fucking decisions and fuck the sham of a democracy the US electoral system is. FPTP and WTA elections in the modern age are a fucking disgrace as well as no equal representation and voting with money.

            • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 days ago

              Voting doesn’t mean shit. I’m sick of arguing with bluemaga. Fuck it. Fight or get out. Stop blaming people who you think have a responsibility to lick your copmommy’s boots.

              If fighting fasch were so important, you should have made literally any compromise.

              • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 days ago

                If fighting fasch were so important, you should have made literally any compromise.

                Any compromise other than voting for the Democrats, you mean. Clearly that’s a compromise too far for plenty here.

                • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  11 days ago

                  Or just any policy compromise. Don’t suck so much billionaire dick, 20% less enthusiasm with the genocide, do something about the cops, whatever. I don’t need everything.

              • y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                11 days ago

                I’m sick of arguing with bluemaga

                then don’t.

                Take your own advice and go fight or get out or whatever. Stop blaming people who you think have a responsibility to do whatever it is you think they should be doing for you and go do the thing yourself.

                If fighting fasch were so important, you wouldn’t be indoors on lemmy telling people to leave.

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 days ago

            I’m not the one who helped let a Nazi win. I’m doing what I can, but I can’t change things with citizens who ignore how the system works and choose to sit out and let this shit happen.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        No, voting is literally the least you can do, and that’s too much for some people…

          • TwentySeven@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 days ago

            You’re the goddamn idiot if you thought abstaining from voting would help anything. Hope you’re proud of yourself shithead

        • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 days ago

          You mean the people getting gassed and beaten and locked in cages fighting these bastards?

          Who’ve been getting shot and stabbed and run over by them in street fights for a decade or more?

          Yeah. Couldn’t be asked to lift a finger

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            That’s not ‘the least you can do’ by any means, but good try at a lazy gotcha to someone who has been tear gassed at these kinds of protests for years.

            Yes, voting is the least you can do. Protesting is a very good tactic, but choosing to disregard political opportunities tells me you’re not really worth listening to.

            Have fun playing computer warrior, kid, I’m tired of you.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          It’s literally the least you can do, less than literally anything else, and doing the least possible is not good enough.

          You don’t get to wash your hands because you voted for Kodos. Has Harris even come out against bombing Iran?

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    12 days ago

    Sounds like some young people who haven’t been through this before. This is not going to lead to a war. The USA has been bombing other countries continuously for decades.

    • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      12 days ago

      Might be the toughest opponent we’ve bombed since Iraq, which technically wasn’t a declared war either.

      You’re absolutely right, this won’t likely get bad for Americans. Being so far away with a huge military insulates us from the consequences of our actions abroad.

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      There are different levels of bombing. This wasn’t the US assassinating a single general. This was a strike on strategic assets comparable to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. We just did a Pearl Harbor against Iran.

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      12 days ago

      I mean, I dont see how it isnt a war already, this kind of thing is an act of war after all, and the other side doesnt have to be capable of equal retaliation for the term to apply.

      • chunes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        It doesn’t really matter what you call it. W. and Obama normalized not declaring war on the countries you bomb. Unless the US plans to invade, it won’t be a war in the traditional sense of the word.

      • chunes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        12 days ago

        you want troops on the ground?

        Genuinely don’t know what reality you’re living in if you are typing this question after reading my comment.

        • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          12 days ago

          I believe their meaning was, ‘Do you have to see boots on the ground before you call it a war?’, not accusing you personally of wanting war.

          • chunes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            Thank you for clarifying.

            My only point with my original comment is that people are freaking out as though this is about to be Iraq War take 3. I see no evidence of that. It would require an invasion.

            I mean how many dozens of times have we done something similar to this without anything becoming of it? Didn’t Trump literally assassinate an Iranian general during his last term?

        • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          Oh. So this is just Tuesday. I guess you should call Iran and tell them. They will be so relieved.

  • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    I am wondering when Americans are finally going to come to the inevitable conclusion that conservatives have to be utterly destroyed by any means necessary in the most extreme prejudicial manner possible. These people are absolute pure f****** evil.

    • Makhno@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      Liberals dont want change. Until the left accepts that libs gotta go in the ground too, nothing will happen.

      • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 days ago

        I agree, but the enablers arent as big of a problem as the perps right now. I feel like they would fall in line pretty quickly upon seeing the consequences of their actions.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      First we need to endlessly debate whether or not Kamala Harris would’ve done the same thing. Since we can never know we can all just assume posting shitty memes is more important than voting. We’ll tell each other it’s late stage capitalism so we can feel smart for doing nothing because it’s all going to collapse anyway, nothing we can do! Committed to being uncommitted! Apathy to the end!

    • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      The people who vote conservative will probably never come to that conclusion.

      We have to let the older generations die off until there isn’t enough support or physically stop them from voting to stop the conservative support.

      Maybe starting a third party that genuinely wants to disrupt the status quo would fix some stuff.

      • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        Lets get something REAALLY FUGHIN STRAIGHT:

        Conservatism DOES NOT DIE OFF.

        AAAALLLLLL of the radical fascist right wing Nazi pundits and influencers are Millennials and younger, with a few GenXers scattered about.

        Everyone SWORE that conservatism would die off with the Boomers, but that was 15 years ago. Its not gonna happen.

        • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          Every new generation votes more progressive leaning than the last.

          So once the boomers are all gone, the Republican Party loses a shit load of control.

          Regressives have tried to appeal to the incels their ideology creates, but it isn’t enough to outpace the above trends.

          • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 days ago

            A law was passed 30 years ago to ensure that the politically motivated only hear one ideology. The platforms have changed since then but the same people are in control of the messaging and censorship.

      • winky_lem@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        3rd party…yes! Possible, not really. The two parties have a spot on the ballot, built in, automatically given. All others have to jump through each state’s requirements to get on the state ballot. The most effective at this lately is the libertarian party. In the election before last, Jo Jorgenson was on the ballot in all 50, GO JO! Sadly, her media coverage was paltry at best. Most Americans didn’t even know she was a realistic option. Finally, most Americans think that a vote for a 3rd party increases the chance of their less desirable major party winning. What they fail to realize is that, red or blue, the boot on your neck is the same boot, different shine.

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 days ago

    Please send us Americans your best “you don’t have healthcare but too many school shootings” memes

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    12 days ago

    What’s super weird is that it resembles the war in Iraq but dumber.

    After 9/11 Americans were out for blood, for revenge.

    This time they were out for blood, democrat blood. Revenge for… being told to stay inside.

    I guess every 20 years they realize they hate each other so they outsource the violence?

    America is truly that neighbour which has constant domestic drama that the rest of the neighbourhood has to put up with constantly cause they are too nice to shun said neighbour.

      • Kairos@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        12 days ago

        Some people see it as pedantic but I’m always bothered when people say “America” when they actually mean the U.S. government. America is a nation, which IMO includes most Canadian citizens and a lot of Mexico (marked by a shared culture). So many bad people use mixing terms between nations and states to try and manifest consent or some shit.

        • huppakee@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          12 days ago

          I think you mean America is not a nation, also besides north-america there is also south-america. You can argue as much as you want about about them being separate continents or not, they definitely share a name. I also talk about Americans when I mean people from US but if someone corrects me the only argument i have is that other people also do that.

          • Kairos@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            Yes, France, the country, and France, the nation also share the same name.

            There’s also the British Isles, Britain, and Great Britain.

            Additionally, you might want to consider South Africa, South Africa, South Africa, and Africa. (Still all different things)

            America in this case, I mean the nation which predominantly exists in North America and in the United States.

            • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              12 days ago

              Yes, France, the country, and France, the nation also share the same name.

              Whenever I see people talking like this I get white nationalist vibes.

              • Kairos@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                11 days ago

                France the nation includes more or less everyone who grew up there, so. IDK if or why you seem to think I’m racist.