• cabbage@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 month ago

      I guess the water could be dirty from sediments without it being unnatural or bad in itself. I have no idea if that’s the case here though. In either case beavers are awesome.

      • logicbomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you think about it, it would make no sense for a beaver to clean water. After they build the dam, it creates a body of water that they swim in. They spend their time on that side of the dam. That would be the “dirty” side. If a beaver dam cleans water, it’s purely coincidental.

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    These eager beavers saved the Czech government $1.2 million

    Do we really think that a beaver dam is the same level of safety/long term investment as a $1.2 million dam?

    I get that they’re trying to be clever or whatever with this headline, but it just comes off as more low-key “government can’t work” propaganda.

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Do we really think that a beaver dam is the same level of safety/long term investment as a $1.2 million dam?

      I mean, the dam is self-repairing.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        The dam is also environmentally friendly - beavers have been building dams in the area for 30 million years, the ecosystems are evolved to live with beaver dams.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        So you would be willing to build a home in a flood zone that is protected by nothing but a “dam” built by beavers?

        The structures may share a name, but believe it or not, humans have innovated quite a bit to say the fucking least…

    • Derpgon@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Safety? In the wild? I mean, a beaver dam doesn’t need safety features because a sane person doesn’t expect it to be safe to interact with a beaver dam.

      Longevity, not sure, but at least it can be replaced by humans if it breaks at a later date.

  • MiDaBa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    These beavers need to be deported for taking local jobs for no pay. There were six of them so that sounds like a gang to me.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 month ago

    Humans: Bureaucracy is slow, we have to consult the locals, we have to check the geology of the location, ensure that construction and materials are up-to-standards, we have no money…

    Beavers: Fine, we’ll do it ourselves!

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Humans: Put their trust in a beaver dam, and find out the hard way why regulations and bureaucracy exist.

  • klay1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 month ago

    I just read the article. Good job beavers, and great story!

    But it says nothing about dirty water. Just the image here does. Why was the water dirty, is there any info on that?

    • cymbal_king@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not sure about the specifics in this particular case, but here are common things that contribute to poor river water quality:

      • Impermeable surfaces in human-built environments, which cause water to flow more quickly and therefore erode river banks (dams and retaining ponds help slow down water flows)
      • Residential and agricultural fertilizer/manure runoff, increases nutrients in water that cause microbes to grow faster
      • Tiling agricultural fields, which releases more of the above
      • Untreated human sewage
      • Improper dumping of industrial chemicals, or breach of containment due to upstream flooding
      • Runoff from abandoned mines
    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      The picture looks like a lot of silt in the water, a dam slows the water flow down which helps a lot of it drop to the bottom.

      Although the clear difference in each side does seem surprising to me, perhaps the dam is fine enough that sand/silt builds up on it and it acts as a filter as well.

    • logicbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 month ago

      The article only says, “to address water issues.” Maybe they read that to mean there were issues with the quality of the water.

      But “water issues” probably more frequently means that the humans have issues procuring enough water, and so in this case they wanted a dam for a water reservoir.

  • BakerBagel@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 month ago

    I live in NW Ohio qnd have thought about how beneficial it would be for the state to revert a few hundred acres along the Maumee river back into a wetland. It would reduce loads if the algal blooms that devastae Lake Erie. Some natural wetlands and beavers would mitigate ao much of that, but the farmers around here are completely opposed to any such ideas

  • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    OK, so how about spending that money in a water treatment plant, so the beavers don’t live in “dirty” water and make things better downstream?