it’s not “whataboutism”. An image maker, has to take it into consideration.
marginally few artists use natural materials. If pollution is the corcern, then there will be no movies, no touring groups, no streaming, no paintings, no prints, no this… no that.
Whataboutism is a really lazy argument.
it’s not “whataboutism”. An image maker, has to take it into consideration.
marginally few artists use natural materials. If pollution is the corcern, then there will be no movies, no touring groups, no streaming, no paintings, no prints, no this… no that.
You what about’d printing. It is textbook Whataboutism. Sorry to trigger you with textbooks.
:) thanks for “triggering me”.
i ask for coherence. If you take it as whataboutism 🤷
Harmfulness of paint doesn’t discredit environmental questions around certain uses of AI.
Removed by mod
Textbook whataboutism.
AI is harmful to the environment, to which you responded, NO paint is harmful.
Now you are tripling down. Cut the crap.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod