• mindbleach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    “It beats smoking” is a low fucking bar.

    The science is that putting shit in your lungs is not great. There’s no upside for non-smokers. It’s a lark. The only truly positive side is that it’s objectively better than inhaling smoke, and that only matters if it’s a tobacco alternative - and contains nicotine. Which let this low-impact delivery mechanism create new addicts.

    Two decades in either direction and the calculus would be trivial. 1990, the way people smoked back then? We’d solve the epidemic overnight. Trade it for vaping in a heartbeat. 2030, the way statistics were headed? Pointless and inexcusable. A brief fad that would linger in countries with hookah culture.

    Instead, the worst-case scenario happened immediately. The same murderous liars made money hooking a new generation with a fairly unsafe and hideously addictive chemical. Like they’d previously done by adding filters, and then menthol, and then cloves.

    • Sausage@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Smoking kills 8 million people worldwide every year. I think it’s worth pushing the alternatives.

      • Shrek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe I read it wrong but what I got from it is this:

        Vaping is good as an alternative to non-smokers. The problem is that it’s being pushed to non-smokers. It’s not as bad as smoking, but the best is neither.

      • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem isn’t pushing it as an alternative to already active smokers, that’s what it was initially touted as…

        The problem is it became the new smoking fad. People who never smoked are taking this up, and are now the new generation of hungry addicts to keep the tobacco corps alive and well.

        • Sausage@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          An adult should be able to do whatever the fuck they want, as long as it doesn’t impact other people. Vaping doesn’t emit any carcinogens or toxic substances, and 10 times less nicotine than smoking does. At the end of the day, vaping does far less harm than smoking, and it’s easier to reduce the amount of nicotine consumed with vaping. Nicotine also has health benefits, such as slowing down the onset of Parkinson’s.

          If teenagers are vaping then that’s an enforcement issue, but at the same time I would be less worried if I found a vape in my kid’s bedroom than a packet of cigarettes. Teenagers will experiement with substances. Nicotne vapes are way down the list of ones I would be worried about.

          • ██████████@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            indeed man.

            waaaaA waaaaaaaA BUT I HATE SMOKERS WAAHHHHHHHH 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

            half the people here 👆 we get it you dont smoke. that means this aint your place to discuss something you are ignorant about

            • Sausage@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Which bit is false?

              From the first link:

              The key finding of this study is that e-cigarettes emit significant amounts of nicotine but do not emit significant amounts of CO and VOCs. We also found that the level of secondhand exposure to nicotine depends on the e-cigarette brand. However, the emissions of nicotine from e-cigarettes were significantly lower than those of tobacco cigarettes.

              • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                In a scientific context “significantly less” essentially means “we were able to prove beyond our error threshold that there was less nicotine”

                As such, it doesn’t mean squat without numbers to back it up. There could be 1% less nicotine and it’d still be significant if their testing method was sensitive enough to reliably capture the difference.

                Whereas this:

                There’s evidence that nonsmokers exposed to secondhand vape aerosol absorb similar levels of nicotine as people exposed to secondhand cigarette smoke.

                Along with nicotine, nonvapers are also exposed to ultrafine particles from secondhand vape aerosol, which may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease.

                Would mean exactly what the person you’re replying to has said it means, assuming it’s true, aka. It’s patently false to say it’s safer for non-smokers to be around.

                • Sausage@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  There are numbers to back it up, in the study I linked. Is 10 times less not significant?

                  The primary harm from cigarettes doesn’t come from the nicotine, it comes from all the other toxic chemicals released by combustion, which aren’t present in the aerosol exhaled from a vape.

                  Nobody is claiming it to be 100% safe (what is?), but it’s not even in the same ballpark of harm as smoking is.

            • CoderKat@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m personally all for banning smoking in public places (besides designated areas and specialty clubs). I agree that exposing people to secondhand smoke is rude at best and a health risk for them at worst. But I do think that especially in the comfort of your own home, you can do what you want (with the caveat that if vaping has similar odor issues as smoking, I see it entirely reasonable that renters can be required to smoke outside).

        • PenguinJuice@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then don’t smoke or vape. No one is forcing you to. Please do not be a pearl clutcher and make decisions for everyone else around you. You’re not God and even GOD gave people the choice to believe in him.

          • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah, that’d be a great suggestion if it weren’t for the fact that we don’t get a choice in breathing those fumes in if we happen to be downwind of a smoker/vaper exercising their choice. You get to choose over your own body but you also get to make the choice over ours.

            Also, really not a great comparison considering the choice is believe in me or burn in hell for all eternity, and God knows which choice we’re going to make from the start (being omniscient and all)

          • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Okay but the only way we can not smoke or vape is for allayall smokers and vapers not to smoke or vape in places where the rest of us breathe. I can’t even go out on my balcony for several of the otherwise most pleasant hours because there’s a guy smoking cigars in the courtyard of the next building and the stench is nauseating. And there’s always a smell of vaping in the hallway of my own building, despite it being open to the outside air at one end. Y’all are so anosmic you have no idea how far your vapor and smoke spreads.

      • dismalnow@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, that’s a lot of words when they could’ve just said “I don’t understand risk, harm reduction, any statistics relavent to the topic, or science.”

        • mindbleach@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          How bluntly does someone have to say ‘this is good compared to smoking, but caused harm for non-smokers’ before y’all stop projecting whatever shallow kneejerk absolute suits your fancy?

          • dismalnow@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            As bluntly, and as often as possible to ensure the demarcation is obvious to all.

            Hate to turn your putrid argument around on you, but this isn’t as trivial as the annoyance of needing a sarcasm flag to avoid Poe’s Law, even though the impact of vaping on adult members of society who do not use it is merely an annoyance which causes their knees to jerk.

            And your facts are wrong: Tobacco smoke kills half a million people per year. The jury is out on whether or not vaping is quantifiably medically dangerous at all. There is absolutely no data on harm from 2nd hand vaping, so you cannot say (in good faith) that it’s causing harm.

            Specifics matter in comparisons when the potential outcome is a total ban on a substance that has helped minimize harm for millions, and is mostly harmless in comparison.

            In short - gnash your teeth elsewhere, you smug turd. You’re wrong.

            Is that clear enough?

            • mindbleach@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              We know the impact of nicotine, fucknuts. The issue is people who DO use this. Adults (for a start) who were never going to smoke cigarettes, but took up vaping, and wound up addicted to tobacco products.

              No, the people who switched over from smoking aren’t relevant. This isn’t about them.

              No, the people who don’t vape with nicotine aren’t relevant. This isn’t about them.

              No, the people who don’t vape, period, aren’t relevant. This isn’t about them.

              Childish accusations weren’t enough - you had to go and underline that your dismissive bullshit was just blindly repeating ‘but it’s good compared to smoking!!!’ Belaboring the impact of tobacco smoke… fuck, why am I bothering? You didn’t read what I wrote the first two times.

              Go make shit up about someone else.

      • dirthawker0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Vaping was how I quit smoking tobacco and then quit vaping too. I started vaping to quit tobacco using premixed liquids for about 2 years, then switched to mixing my own so I took control of my nicotine intake. Over the course of about 8 months I kept cutting the nicotine in half. I would have a bit of a headache for a couple days then I would get better. After vaping at 0% for about 2 weeks, I noticed I was not picking up the vape as often and I could just leave it on the other side of the room and not care. About another month and I was entirely done. Previously about 1/2 pack a day smoker for 25+ years, now free of everything for about 6 years now.

      • mindbleach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        “It beats smoking” is a low fucking bar… that I already mentioned.

        What conversation do you think you’re having?

    • itsJoelle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I haven’t smoked a cigarette in six years. Most of the time I use nicotine lozenges during the day, and my vape is for when I’m drinking or I need to fall on my crutch. It’s familiar to my known vice, and stopped me from the more dangerous method of handling my addiction.

      Grand stand all you will about how it was ‘solved’ over night, but I got hooked on the bitch in the 2000’s due to family history and culture. People still smoke all around me, and it was only a matter of time before I tried it and got hooked. And I’ve made peace with that. That’s before we even touch a more terrifying addiction that exists all over my country within opiate-families despite them having a stronger controlled classification. While the chemical exists in the environment potential addicts will happen across it and subsist.

      ‘It beats smoking’ is a pretty important bar for me, as an addict, because it reduces harm to myself

      • mindbleach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        ‘Vaping is negative except compared to smoking.’

        ‘Oh yeah well what about compared to smoking?!’

        … ibid.

        • itsJoelle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I don’t think anyone is arguing vaping is a good thing, and nor was I. It would be rather foolish to do so.

          I was only giving my perspective at how it has been better for me and many others in my life.

          🤷‍♀️

          • mindbleach@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            A guy in another subthread just told me to kill myself for saying nicotine is bad, actually.

            The endless reiteration of ‘but! vaping! beats! smoking!’ is a great big ‘who asked?’ at best. I know. I said that, first. It was the first thing I said, in the root comment. It is the opposite of news, and simply not relevant.

            That positive is not the negative I’m pointing out - as a response to the insistence there are no negatives.

    • MxM111@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you advocating for cigarettes ban? Because if not, how you can advocate for vile ban? If you advocate for neither, then what do you mean by “it beats smocking “ is a low fucking bar”?

      • mindbleach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Cigarettes are sufficiently regulated that the industry was going to die. No outright ban was necessary.

        That is no longer the case, directly thanks to this shit. Like if Philip Morris started selling nicotine patches as a brand new drug.

        “The science is clear” only means, vaping beats smoking. A fact absolutely no-one questions. But vaping is worse than not vaping. The lesser-evil argument only works when there’s no third option. Like “neither.”

        Serving the same purpose as smoking, while being less dangerous, is great… compared to smoking.

        But the purpose of smoking fucking blows.

        • MxM111@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          But vaping is worse than not vaping.

          But this fact also absolutely no-one questions.

          And are you saying that somehow coping is regulated less??

    • ██████████@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      dude its tobacco not black tar heroin get of your high horse i would blow smoke straightkbin your face at a party

      except you havent been to a party in how long?