• Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    The fuck metric are they using for the economy??? The billionaires wealth increase? The stock market? Because I can’t afford my rent or to feed my fucking family. Fuck off with your bullshit.

    I don’t blame Biden for it, I blame the orange man. But the economy isn’t an exclamation point that should be used for the average person. The economy fucking sucks. EVERYONE HAS JOBS!!! … Yeah… they have 3 of them… start looking at the purchasing power of that money, not just the dollar amount.

    • Lavitz@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      This! This! This!

      Anyone who can afford to invest seems to be doing fine and everyone else is screwed. Rent, bills and the cost of food are out of control.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        The weird part is people think the president caused any of that or has the ability to fix it.

        • Lavitz@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          There’s this thing presidential candidates run called a campaign and in this campaign they lay out their economic policies.

          • Zak@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Presidential candidates certainly say things about the economic policies they’d like to see enacted, but most of the actual policy making is up to congress, and monetary policy is the domain of the Federal Reserve.

            Factors which no part of the US government has direct control over often have a bigger impact than those that it does, from plagues to wars on other continents to business conditions.

              • Zak@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                I do. I also know that Trump nominated Chairman Powell to his first term, and Biden nominated him to his second. Seems they agree on something.

                That’s not even unusual; four out of the past five Fed chairs were nominated by at least two presidents from different parties.

                • Lavitz@lemmings.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  So we agree the president can make a significant change to the federal reserve which you said is involved in monetary policy. Which means…

                  • Zak@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    A president could, in theory make a campaign promise about what kind of people they would nominate to the Fed board. A friendly enough senate might even confirm those nominees.

                    Other than the chair and vice-chair, board members serve 14 year terms, which are intended to help insulate them from politics. A president with very specific ideas about monetary policy could put their thumb on the scale a bit, but the system is designed to resist that.

          • Zak@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            He is a politician running for reelection in a tight race. He’s going to claim credit for anything good that happened during his term that voters might possibly believe.

            That’s not even meant as a criticism; it’s just how the game is played.

              • Zak@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Politicians claim all sorts of things that have, at best tenuous connections to reality.

                We shouldn’t accept the claim that Biden fixed the economy, nor Trump’s claim that Biden broke the economy, nor either of their claims that they’re going to fix it next term.

      • aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        61% of adults in the US invest - not 1 or 2%.

        Prices on food have been decreasing, and mostly were a result of supermarket chains dialing their profit margin up - look at Kroger and Publix’ YoY profit margin numbers.

        Housing prices are currently seeing downward pressure. The zero interest rate is what blew up the bubble - and we’re now seeing the effects of correcting it back to a normal rate.

          • aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yeah, they own 93% of everything. That’s irrelevant to whether people in the middle class are seeing a better economy. And, which president has helped improve that figure, and which has not?

            • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              People are not seeing a better economy, they can see past the gaslighting coming from our government, and gaslighting doesn’t pay the bills

    • EnderWiggin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Wages are up, and inflation is down. The economy isn’t roaring, but it’s a hell of a lot more stable than what Biden was handed in 2020. The examples you are offering, while certainly valid for the folks in your community, are anecdotal. The facts are in the data. This country is too big to determine its overall economic health with a localized eye check. Lots of folks are struggling. Lots of folks are also thriving.

      • HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Comparing against COVID joblessness is a hell of a premise. I would argue it’s a much better measurement to use a ratio of rent/mortgage to income. It is undeniable that the cost of housing has far outpaced real income. Anecdotally, this has become much worse since the pandemic.

        Additionally, averages are just averages. A decent average doesn’t negate the negative side of that average. In many ways, the current US economy is truly the best of times and the worst of times. If the cost of housing wasn’t so ridiculous, the other price increases would be more tolerable.

        For some context, here’s a recent NPR article of the cost of housing: https://www.npr.org/2024/06/20/nx-s1-5005972/home-prices-wages-paychecks-rent-housing-harvard-report

        • EnderWiggin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Where are you even getting that from? Economics isn’t a matter of opinion. Wages are, in fact, up, and inflation has been easing. This isn’t about fascism or race. This has been an across the board trend since 2021. Things are far from perfect, but they are improving.