• Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    And civil rights.

    Plus sustainable technology.

    And critical infrastructure.

    Also climate change.

    Taxing the wealthy.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Oh, geez, that one is huge. Great point.

        160 billion in student debt cancelled.

        • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          160 million? Th… That’s it? I mean, that’s cool, it’s not nothing, but the top Google search stat shows that US citizens owe a collective 1.77 trillion in student debt.

          He cancelled (1.6x10^8 / 1.77x10^12) 0.00009% of student debt. That’s like… A homeopathic cancellation.

              • Billiam@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                17
                ·
                6 months ago

                It should also be remembered that he’s tried to cancel more than that, but the assholes on SCOTUS have ruled multiple times that he doesn’t have the authority.

                Of course, that was also before they ruled the President is immune from any “official” acts, so who know what Biden might do before November.

              • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                Sure thing, that was my typing mistake earlier, thanks for bringing it up.

                1 percent is a rounding error, but wiping away 10%, 160 billion, despite the conservatives stopping him from erasing 400 billion recently is pretty impressive.

      • ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        There’s nothing wrong with wanting supporting evidence for claims, but when someone says something that’s very provable and common knowledge and you ask for proof - you become known as an idiot.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Civil rights - LGBTQ+ legal funding, protecting youth from conversion therapy, healthcare access, reversing Trump’s ban on trans military personnel, housing protections

        Sustainable technology - “best” is hard among so many, probably the 65$ billion dollars inveatment for clean energy infrastructure in the US

        Critical infrastructure - the largest investment in US infrastructure in US history, over a trillion dollars resulting in over 50000 new infrastructure projects.

        Climate change - again, the “best” is tricky here…I guess either the hundreds of billions in green tech, clean energy, mass transit, rejoining climate accords, increasing regulations on polluters… You can choose any one of those.

        Oh and taxing the wealthy. Biden succeeded in that too.

        • rayyy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          taxing the wealthy

          ^ That’s the one that triggered the media attack on him.

        • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Healthcare - Biden limiting drug prices helps a ton of people. Also, trump pledged to get rid of the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) and replace it with nothing. So… not ruining everything is also good.

          See that’s the thing, Biden would be a better president than trump if he literally pledged to do nothing. Trump has pledged to make things worse, mostly for his own benefit.

          That’s your choice: a shit sandwich or… not eating a shit sandwich. Tough one, I know.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            23
            ·
            6 months ago

            You are weirdly angry that Biden helped a lot of vulnerable people through drug pricing regulation.

            That’s what I’m saying. You’re agreeing with me.

            Some of Biden’s other first-term achievements(listed directly above) have been incredibly helpful to hundreds of millions of people.

            Weird that not eating a shit sandwich is a difficult decision for you, but maybe it explains why you don’t understand the previous comment.

            Biden isn’t a better president compared to dumps, he literally invested more in infrastructure and clean technology and climate change than any other president.

            Biden has made and is still making huge strides in civil rights.

            He’s taxing the wealthy.

            He’s making a lot of progressive strides.

            You even agree with that in the first sentence, what do you think you’re arguing about?

              • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                6 months ago

                I like the trolls, they are funny.

                I also accept that this is often sound, logical advice.

              • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                6 months ago

                I like the trolls, they are funny.

                I also accept that this is often sound, logical advice.

            • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              21
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              You’re agreeing with me.

              You even agree with that in the first sentence, what do you think you’re arguing about?

              So why do you think I’m arguing with you?

              • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                18
                ·
                6 months ago

                I don’t.

                You’re agreeing with me that biden is a good president, but incorrect that he’s only a good precedent relative to Trump.

                You’re very confused. Do you have any questions?

                • ripcord@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  …but you said they’re arguing with you, which is why they asked why you think they’re arguing with you.

      • Rookwood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Lmao at being downvoted for asking for tangible examples. Platitudes don’t win elections, folks. See 2016.

        • swim@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          If you’re curious about the downvotes, I would consider that it appears you thought you were “asking,” when what your comment does is issue a command. With no other context to understand from where you are coming.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    As always, “economy” in a headline can be replaced with “rich people’s yacht money.”

  • BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    The same economy that’s reliant on sucking the working class dry of every last cent?

  • Rookwood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    6 months ago

    The article cherry-picks data to reach it’s conclusions. Unemployment is not the best it’s every been. It has been rising rapidly, it’s up half a percent in the last year, and this print was the first pause we’ve had since March. Unemployment is rising due to Fed fighting inflation with higher interest rates. The higher interest rates are the reason inflation is coming down and Biden has done nothing to address that. The only thing he did was dump our oil reserves on the market when gas prices were rising early in the inflation cycle. That was 2 years ago.

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    and the slowest annual gain in prices since March 2021.

    Its shit like this, dont tout this like a victory, i cant afford electricity right now

    • rayyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      The recession started to emerge in 2019. You don’t turn a large ship around on a dime. There are more jobs, wages are up and inflation is down. What do you expect?

    • Rookwood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      6 months ago

      Biden has also had 0 impact on that. The Fed is managing that because Congress doesn’t do anything but pass legislation for lobbyists and the Fed is also driving up unemployment as a result.

      • blazera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        the president has the impact of the most powerful endorsement in the country. Technically, the president’s impact on legislation is just his ability to veto, but in practice both parties operate in tandem with the executive and legislative branches, the president is the figurehead of the party and the strategy has generally been to rally behind their campaign platform. With Biden we’ve had the inflation reduction act and the infrastructure bill. Obama famously drove the affordable care act, even though they personally didnt get to vote on it.

  • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    Note the complete absence of any mention of housing prices in this article (and every other pro-Biden article about how great the economy is and why we should be grateful).

      • aodhsishaj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        Drop in the bucket, the issue is with zoning and how banks are apportioning debt and packaging home loans.

        If we want home ownership to be available to the common person, and are unwilling to set a realistic national wage, we should just allow the Fed to issue home loans again and get rid of the middlemen all together.

        • MagicShel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Respectfully, two things:

          1. Biden has done something to reduce housing prices, which was my point. It’s a whole different argument to say he hasn’t done enough or has done the wrong things - fine, I was just saying it’s unfair to say he has done nothing to help.
          2. Zoning and loan structure isn’t nearly the problem that wealth inequality is. Tax the fuck out of the upper income brackets, and put it in the hands of consumers to spend and drive the economy and buy fucking houses.
          • aodhsishaj@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Hey, thanks for the respectful reply. I apologize for the delay in mine.

            I believe we’re saying pretty much the same thing. Banks being able to set rates based on debt and the nebulous policy of a credit score, feed into wealth inequality, especially as to how it relates to home ownership.

            Yes you are absolutely correct that the one main problem in the US today is wealth inequality. There is no arguing that. However, likely policy that has historical reference would be bringing back something akin to the Fannie Mae of the 1930’s but instead of paying the the Banks to service the loan, the Fed would take on the debt itself and would escrow the sale between the home owner and the home buyer.

            The reason I bring up the Great Depression is because as you’ve pointed out, the wealth inequality gap is growing, at a similar rate as to what led to the Great Depression. Unregulated securities are being traded by common folk and there’s a looming sea change as to what employment will look like.

            Unfortunately for us both, we live in interesting times.

          • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Have you heard of executive orders? Sure he can’t do it directly, but imposing a 100% tax on corporations/individuals buying more than a certain number of residential properties? A large tax on rental income from residential properties? Quit acting like he’s powerless.

            • Billiam@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              The President can’t impose taxes, bud. That’s Constitutionally delegated to Congress.

              Now, if you said “use the military to arrest any corporation that owns more than five residences” you would have a case.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is bad messaging even though he probably has prevented some level of collapse. The trump tax cuts for the rich have lead to a lot of assets being hoovered up by all the surplus cash and the absolute ballooning of asset management companies. Until those things are fixed the economy will stay fucked

  • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    “Listen, dipshit. I don’t care if you can’t afford groceries, I don’t care if you our landlord priced you out of your own home, and I certainly don’t give a fuck you can’t find a new job that pays enough to live. The economy is doing great, all the graphs the capitalists chose says so. Your lived experience is a lie. Shut up, don’t ask questions, and vote for me.”

  • Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    The fuck metric are they using for the economy??? The billionaires wealth increase? The stock market? Because I can’t afford my rent or to feed my fucking family. Fuck off with your bullshit.

    I don’t blame Biden for it, I blame the orange man. But the economy isn’t an exclamation point that should be used for the average person. The economy fucking sucks. EVERYONE HAS JOBS!!! … Yeah… they have 3 of them… start looking at the purchasing power of that money, not just the dollar amount.

    • Lavitz@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      This! This! This!

      Anyone who can afford to invest seems to be doing fine and everyone else is screwed. Rent, bills and the cost of food are out of control.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        The weird part is people think the president caused any of that or has the ability to fix it.

        • Lavitz@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          There’s this thing presidential candidates run called a campaign and in this campaign they lay out their economic policies.

          • Zak@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Presidential candidates certainly say things about the economic policies they’d like to see enacted, but most of the actual policy making is up to congress, and monetary policy is the domain of the Federal Reserve.

            Factors which no part of the US government has direct control over often have a bigger impact than those that it does, from plagues to wars on other continents to business conditions.

              • Zak@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                I do. I also know that Trump nominated Chairman Powell to his first term, and Biden nominated him to his second. Seems they agree on something.

                That’s not even unusual; four out of the past five Fed chairs were nominated by at least two presidents from different parties.

                • Lavitz@lemmings.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  So we agree the president can make a significant change to the federal reserve which you said is involved in monetary policy. Which means…

          • Zak@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            He is a politician running for reelection in a tight race. He’s going to claim credit for anything good that happened during his term that voters might possibly believe.

            That’s not even meant as a criticism; it’s just how the game is played.

              • Zak@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Politicians claim all sorts of things that have, at best tenuous connections to reality.

                We shouldn’t accept the claim that Biden fixed the economy, nor Trump’s claim that Biden broke the economy, nor either of their claims that they’re going to fix it next term.

      • aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        61% of adults in the US invest - not 1 or 2%.

        Prices on food have been decreasing, and mostly were a result of supermarket chains dialing their profit margin up - look at Kroger and Publix’ YoY profit margin numbers.

        Housing prices are currently seeing downward pressure. The zero interest rate is what blew up the bubble - and we’re now seeing the effects of correcting it back to a normal rate.

          • aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yeah, they own 93% of everything. That’s irrelevant to whether people in the middle class are seeing a better economy. And, which president has helped improve that figure, and which has not?

            • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              People are not seeing a better economy, they can see past the gaslighting coming from our government, and gaslighting doesn’t pay the bills

    • EnderWiggin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Wages are up, and inflation is down. The economy isn’t roaring, but it’s a hell of a lot more stable than what Biden was handed in 2020. The examples you are offering, while certainly valid for the folks in your community, are anecdotal. The facts are in the data. This country is too big to determine its overall economic health with a localized eye check. Lots of folks are struggling. Lots of folks are also thriving.

  • shiroininja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t give a shit about the economy. I’ve been broke through boom and bust. I care about the safety, freedom, and happiness of those I love. The centrists of the democratic party like this bag o bones are doing nothing about that.

  • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    6 months ago

    We are not in a recession and economic growth is positive?

    When did the federal minimum wage go up?

    Did workers get more rights?

    When did food prices go down?

    Did housing costs get cheaper?

    Has a sustainable and more affordable energy source been found to lower power bills?

    Are the costs of healthcare something he solved?

    How did he fix transportation costs?

    wow did not know we were living in the Golden Age of Biden

    good thing propaganda articles like this are around keep us in the know

    Hail Biden and Vote BLUE!

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Gas was lower for the ducks who care. I was saying where’s all the “I did that” stickers now

  • ABCDE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    6 months ago

    I thought it was his team? Make your minds up. If it’s the team, get someone else to head it, because this is a fucking disaster

    • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      “Vote for administrations, not Biden! Btw this is all Biden’s doing, single handedly. Also Biden can’t do anything alone, he needs congress.”