• slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Rotated a horizontally polarised antenna to vertical polarisation because the contractor wasn’t listening.

    • Vanth@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Was each time a different religious organization and did they require a baptism into their religion specifically?

      I was raised and baptized into one flavor of Christian. They taught baptism in any other flavor of Christian was all good, no need to be baptized again to switch churches though the pastor might want to say an extra conversion prayer.

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Became an atheist and quit going to church. After decades of being very involved in church. My experience wasn’t nearly as difficult or traumatic as it is for many who go through this. But it still sucked. I pissed off some friends and family members. And some folks I really liked froze me out, which is not fun. Atheist friends were supportive, which was a big help.

  • Bear@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    42 minutes ago

    Everything that matters in life is subjective. Everything depends on infinite unknowns and unknowables truly beyond human comprehension. All morality, right and wrong, all action and thought, is inherently whimsical. You don’t need any reason at all. Therefore God both does and doesn’t exist.

  • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Purchased a soft drink from a fast food restaurant. I have a few friends that, in their minds, it is never justified to buy a drink from a fast food place if you’re doing takeout because “you have drinks at home, they charge $3 for something that costs them $0.11 to make, etc.”

    It’s become somewhat of a debate amongst our group of friends: I argue they have flavors I may not have at home, it can be a treat, and it helps keep restaurants in business since drinks are where they make their money. I’m told it doesn’t matter, the upcharge is too much to justify.

    I’ve boiled my view on it to “There is a fine line between frugal and cheap.” But never thought the purchase of a soft drink would be so polarizing amongst people in my life, hahaha.

    There’s also an ongoing moratorium on the board game Life simply because we cannot agree if it’s legal for one player to take out all of the bank’s loans on their first turn. It’s not explicitly stated in the rules you can’t, but many of us feel it defeats the spirit of the game.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Heh, well I can make it worse, prepare to be judged!

      Soda is for suckers. It’s just extremely overpriced sugar water and it’s basically a direct route to diabetes town. Also enjoy all the extra dental work you’ll require.

      Weirdly, I’m not against alcohol. While drinking a lot isn’t a great idea either, I do understand the appeal of alcohol. I still try not to buy it in bars or restaurants though, the 5x mark up has always felt unreasonable.

  • pdxfed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    For the most part, defending free speech. It’s been watered down to be interpreted as “speech I agree with”.

    Polarization fed by poor education fed by poverty in the US over the last few decades has left people believing in false dichotomies; if you’re not with me you’re against me. See it on Lemmy a lot actually, people being nervous when you don’t clearly support or agree with them and then get defensive as they assume you must be “the other” group.

    We live in a world now where money and scale supporting shitty and /or dangerous ideas hardly make it the traditional town square of ideas though. I have my own internal struggles with it.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Why stop there? Anyone that requires any help of any kind from any other person should be immediately executed. We’re rugged individualists, not a bunch of socialist pussies!

    • Beacon@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      “Polarizing” doesn’t mean “almost everyone disagrees with you”. It means “many people agree with you and many people disagree with you”.

      But if you said “people in poor health should HAVE THE OPTION of being euthanized” then that would qualify as polarizing

    • bizarroland@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Mead said that the first sign of civilization in an ancient culture was a femur (thighbone) that had been broken and then healed. Mead explained that in the animal kingdom, if you break your leg, you die. You cannot run from danger, get to the river for a drink or hunt for food. You are meat for prowling beasts. No animal survives a broken leg long enough for the bone to heal.

      I get that you are saying that after a person becomes a financial burden on the population that we should get rid of them and save the resources, but that’s very short thinking and it’s a very selfish stance and I get why you’re sharing it now because the question was what’s the most polarizing thing you’ve said and my response is very polarized because I feel like you and anybody who agrees with you should be excommunicated from society and put onto a small island somewhere where we never have to deal with them ever again.

  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Academia Is Not Law, especially when it comes to subjective things involving marginalised groups. There can be and are massive systematic and institutional failures that mean many papers are misleading.

    Most people broadly agree that the treatment of people with mental conditions, black people, lgbt people, etc was shocking and unacceptable even 50 years ago… And yet some people assume we’ve “fixed” that nowadays and everything is above board and perfectly fair and ethical.

    • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 minutes ago

      “We’ve had a black President, so we don’t need anti-discrimination laws or DEI initiatives anymore!”

  • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I’ve got two.

    • The US has arrived at the stage where an entirely new constitution/model of government, probably down to the very borders of the states themselves in the 48, needs to be implemented, just to let off the pressure of just how large a scale the US operates on in every dimension compared to what the original 13 were looking at.

    • The two state solution has been rendered untenable by Israel’s settler shit, the best way to protect the interests of Palestinians is to break down the border entirely and make them voting citizens with a say in the Knesset, and at this point I am convinced the only way that can be established is with an occupation force from outside both nations ready and willing to haul off anyone doing anything to threaten the coexistence and execute them. They won’t coexist in peace, so let them coexist under the sword of Damocles. If I had my way honestly, Jerusalem would have a nuke installed under the temple mount, with a switch set to destroy the city entirely if they’re going to insist on continuing to try and total victory wipe eachother out.

    If they can’t have the land together, they’ll have the ashes together.

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    21 hours ago

    In physics lab we had 2 linear polarizers and by varying their relative angle, could polarize or block all light.

    I also used a circular polarizer, but that didn’t feel as polarizing to me.

  • erenkoylu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    prosecuting hateful speech is a very slippery slope. It effectively gives the government the authority to decide what speech is allowed, which can’t end well.

  • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    20 hours ago

    An economy that relies on basic human needs being treated as an investment is a failed economy. (Housing)

    • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I agree, but maybe houses can still be paid, but if you cant afford it theres also (smaller) free housing.