Personally, I don’t* but I was curious what others think.

*some sandwiches excluded like a Cubano or chicken parm; those do require cooking.

  • andrewta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    I guess it would depend on the type of sandwich

    . Peanut butter and jelly? No

    A simple cheese sandwich? No

    Grilled cheese sandwich? Yes

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      What about a grilled cheese and peanut butter and jelly and pickles sandwich with a side of sourkrout?

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        peanut butter and jelly and pickles sandwich

        this sounds like something my SiL would eat when she was pregnant.

        also… what kind of pickles? I bet i could get my nephew and nieces to eat it, and they’d probably love it.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    “Cooking” to me, requires the combination of ingredients AND heating them to create a new thing. Making a grilled cheese is basic, but cooking. Slapping meat, cheese and veg on bread is not cooking.

  • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Entirely context dependent.

    Who’s cooking tonight? Me, and if it’s sandwiches, salad, etc - still counts.

    No cooking in the room. Combining sliced bread with sliced cheese out of the bag - doesn’t count.

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    IMO, assembling a sandwich from ready-to-eat ingredients without using a stove, oven, microwave, etc. is meal prep, not cooking. If you roast, saute, toast, smoke, or even zap any part of it, now you’re cookin’. (Though zapping might just be reheating something that was cooked previously. Ugh, this is more complicated than it should be. English can be frustrating.)

  • psilotop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s only cooking if it’s done in the Cooke region governed by the Earle of Sandwich. Anything else is sparkling food preparation.

  • untorquer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The specific language you speak has significant impact here. For some, "to make food* is used to refer to cooking. Where as in English it’s not so clear. I prefer the use in terms of survival. IMO, if you can make any food enough to survive you can cook, because in English there is not a better colloquial verb. Though i wouldn’t call you ‘a cook’ or ‘a chef’ if you can’t apply heat to produce edible food from raw.

    • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      This might be different depending on the speaker, but at least for me Portuguese and Italian are even stricter on interpreting cozinhar/cozer and cucinare/cuocere as involving heat. Like, if I were to say for example ⟨*cozinhei um sanduíche⟩ (literally “I *cooked a sandwich”), I’m almost sure that people would interpret it as “I picked an already prepared sandwich and used it as ingredient for something else”

      • untorquer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean that’s true of the english term as well. But if someone says they can’t cook i default to thinking they order out every meal or use a microwave fot cup of ramen. Making sandwiches, salads, and other cold foods is still a skill but there’s no word such as cold-cutlerist and i refuse andwich artist.

        • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Perhaps I’m overthinking it, but the English verb seems to have different meanings when it’s used transitive and intransitively. For example, let’s say that you ask someone to prepare you a salad, and the person answers:

          • “I can’t cook.” (sounds OK?)
          • “I can’t cook a salad.” (sounds weird)
          • untorquer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I think that’s grammatically true but i tend to think of it more in terms of colloquialisms or slang. I imagine intransitive use of the verb developed out of convenience for lack of a lazy alternative. “I can’t prepare food” would either suggest you require assistance to eat, you can’t legally work at a restaurant, or your aristocratic status is beyond that of a mere peasant who has seen a kitchen before.

  • rapadura@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Cooking is a process of transformation, both physical and symbolic. Combining ingredients intentionally to create something flavorful and nutritious, making a sandwich certainly falls under the act of cooking.

  • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t think it’s cooking unless you are applying heat to cause a chemical reaction. So, making a grilled cheese sandwich counts as cooking, but a BP&J does not.

    • sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      True, but, turn that into ‘I’m cooking up a sandwich’, and now the phrase potentially expands its domain to basically mean any kind of food preparation.

      The addition if ‘up’ makes it less literal, more jovial and less bounded.

      • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        True, but, turn that into ‘I’m cooking up a sandwich’, and now the phrase potentially expands its domain to basically mean any kind of food preparation.

        The phrase expands into any preparation or invention, even ones that clearly do not have anything to do with cooking. e.g. “I’m cooking up a plan to deal with this.”

  • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ehhh food preparation more than cooking. You’re just assembling things. I’m a pro at a good sandwich if I do say so myself. Sometimes I have to cook to make that happen. But a basic sandwich…nah, no cooking involved.

    • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Depends on your start point. You can bake your own bread, cook/combine your own condiments, and roast/cure your own meats.

      • Evil_incarnate@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        You can grow your wheat, and raise pigs, but to really make it from scratch, first you need to create the universe.

      • HipsterTenZero@dormi.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        the bread is the lynch pin of the sandwich. You can do whatever you want with the rest of the ingredients, but the bread must (usually) be baked.

        • KingJalopy @lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Fair enough. Do you still consider it baking if your bread comes in a bag from the grocery store?

  • TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Depends on the sandwich. If you’re constructing a sandwich without using heat, I would consider that “making lunch” or “making dinner” but not explicitly cooking. I’m not sure that the difference matters in any significant situations, though. Why are you asking?